使用可穿戴热装置进行冷热交替刺激对主观和客观肩部僵硬的影响。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences
Tomonori Sawada, Hiroki Okawara, Daisuke Nakashima, Shuhei Iwabuchi, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura, Takeo Nagura
{"title":"使用可穿戴热装置进行冷热交替刺激对主观和客观肩部僵硬的影响。","authors":"Tomonori Sawada,&nbsp;Hiroki Okawara,&nbsp;Daisuke Nakashima,&nbsp;Shuhei Iwabuchi,&nbsp;Morio Matsumoto,&nbsp;Masaya Nakamura,&nbsp;Takeo Nagura","doi":"10.1186/s40101-021-00275-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Technological innovations have allowed the use of miniature apparatus that can easily control and program heat and cold stimulations using Peltier elements. The wearable thermo-device has a potential to be applied to conventional contrast bath therapy. This study aimed to examine the effects of alternating heat and cold stimulation (HC) using a wearable thermo-device on subjective and objective improvement of shoulder stiffness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty healthy young male individuals (20.3 ± 0.6 years) participated in this study. The interventions were randomly conducted under four conditions, including HC, heat stimulation, cold stimulation, and no stimulation on their bilateral trapezius muscle, after a 30-min typing task. Each intervention was administered at least 1 week apart. The analyzed limb was the dominant arm. Muscle hardness was assessed using a portable muscle hardness meter, as well as the skin temperature over the stimulated area. After each condition, the participants were asked for feedback regarding subjective improvement in refreshed feelings, muscle stiffness, and muscle fatigue using an 11-point numerical rating scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With regard to muscle hardness, only the HC condition significantly decreased from 1.43 N to 1.37 N (d = 0.44, p < 0.05). Additionally, reduced muscle hardness in HC condition was associated with the degree of skin cooling during the intervention (cold max: r = 0.634, p < 0.01; cold change: r = -0.548, p < 0.05). Subjective improvement in refreshed feelings, muscle stiffness, and muscle fatigue was determined in the HC and heat stimulation conditions compared with the no stimulation condition (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Moreover, the HC condition showed significantly greater improvements in muscle stiffness and fatigue compared to the cold stimulation condition (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study demonstrated that HC promoted not only better subjective symptoms, such as muscle stiffness and fatigue, but also lesser muscle hardness. Furthermore, an association was observed between the degree of skin temperature cooling and reduced muscle hardness during HC. Further investigations on the ratio and intensity of cooling should be conducted in the future to establish the optimal HC protocol for muscle stiffness or fatigue.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UMIN000040620 . Registered 1 June 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":16768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiological Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722412/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of alternating heat and cold stimulation using a wearable thermo-device on subjective and objective shoulder stiffness.\",\"authors\":\"Tomonori Sawada,&nbsp;Hiroki Okawara,&nbsp;Daisuke Nakashima,&nbsp;Shuhei Iwabuchi,&nbsp;Morio Matsumoto,&nbsp;Masaya Nakamura,&nbsp;Takeo Nagura\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40101-021-00275-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Technological innovations have allowed the use of miniature apparatus that can easily control and program heat and cold stimulations using Peltier elements. The wearable thermo-device has a potential to be applied to conventional contrast bath therapy. This study aimed to examine the effects of alternating heat and cold stimulation (HC) using a wearable thermo-device on subjective and objective improvement of shoulder stiffness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty healthy young male individuals (20.3 ± 0.6 years) participated in this study. The interventions were randomly conducted under four conditions, including HC, heat stimulation, cold stimulation, and no stimulation on their bilateral trapezius muscle, after a 30-min typing task. Each intervention was administered at least 1 week apart. The analyzed limb was the dominant arm. Muscle hardness was assessed using a portable muscle hardness meter, as well as the skin temperature over the stimulated area. After each condition, the participants were asked for feedback regarding subjective improvement in refreshed feelings, muscle stiffness, and muscle fatigue using an 11-point numerical rating scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With regard to muscle hardness, only the HC condition significantly decreased from 1.43 N to 1.37 N (d = 0.44, p < 0.05). Additionally, reduced muscle hardness in HC condition was associated with the degree of skin cooling during the intervention (cold max: r = 0.634, p < 0.01; cold change: r = -0.548, p < 0.05). Subjective improvement in refreshed feelings, muscle stiffness, and muscle fatigue was determined in the HC and heat stimulation conditions compared with the no stimulation condition (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Moreover, the HC condition showed significantly greater improvements in muscle stiffness and fatigue compared to the cold stimulation condition (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study demonstrated that HC promoted not only better subjective symptoms, such as muscle stiffness and fatigue, but also lesser muscle hardness. Furthermore, an association was observed between the degree of skin temperature cooling and reduced muscle hardness during HC. Further investigations on the ratio and intensity of cooling should be conducted in the future to establish the optimal HC protocol for muscle stiffness or fatigue.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UMIN000040620 . Registered 1 June 2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiological Anthropology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722412/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiological Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-021-00275-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-021-00275-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:技术创新已经允许使用微型设备,可以很容易地控制和程序热和冷刺激使用珀尔帖元素。该可穿戴热装置具有应用于传统对比浴治疗的潜力。本研究旨在探讨使用可穿戴热装置的冷热交替刺激(HC)对主观和客观改善肩部僵硬的影响。方法:20例健康青年男性(20.3±0.6岁)参加本研究。在完成30分钟的打字任务后,随机进行HC、热刺激、冷刺激和不刺激双侧斜方肌四种情况下的干预。每次干预间隔至少1周。所分析的肢体为优势臂。使用便携式肌肉硬度计评估肌肉硬度,以及受刺激区域的皮肤温度。在每一种情况下,参与者都被要求使用11分的数值评定量表,就精神状态、肌肉僵硬和肌肉疲劳的主观改善提供反馈。结果:在肌肉硬度方面,只有HC状态从1.43 N显著降低到1.37 N (d = 0.44, p < 0.05)。此外,HC状态下肌肉硬度降低与干预期间皮肤冷却程度相关(冷最大值:r = 0.634, p < 0.01;冷变化:r = -0.548, p < 0.05)。与无刺激相比,HC和热刺激组在精神振奋感、肌肉僵硬度和肌肉疲劳方面的主观改善(p < 0.01和p < 0.05)。此外,与冷刺激相比,高温条件下肌肉僵硬和疲劳的改善明显更大(p < 0.05)。结论:目前的研究表明,HC不仅可以改善主观症状,如肌肉僵硬和疲劳,还可以降低肌肉硬度。此外,在HC期间观察到皮肤温度冷却程度与肌肉硬度降低之间的关联。未来应进一步研究冷却的比例和强度,以建立肌肉僵硬或疲劳的最佳HC方案。试验注册:UMIN000040620。2020年6月1日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of alternating heat and cold stimulation using a wearable thermo-device on subjective and objective shoulder stiffness.

Effects of alternating heat and cold stimulation using a wearable thermo-device on subjective and objective shoulder stiffness.

Effects of alternating heat and cold stimulation using a wearable thermo-device on subjective and objective shoulder stiffness.

Effects of alternating heat and cold stimulation using a wearable thermo-device on subjective and objective shoulder stiffness.

Background: Technological innovations have allowed the use of miniature apparatus that can easily control and program heat and cold stimulations using Peltier elements. The wearable thermo-device has a potential to be applied to conventional contrast bath therapy. This study aimed to examine the effects of alternating heat and cold stimulation (HC) using a wearable thermo-device on subjective and objective improvement of shoulder stiffness.

Methods: Twenty healthy young male individuals (20.3 ± 0.6 years) participated in this study. The interventions were randomly conducted under four conditions, including HC, heat stimulation, cold stimulation, and no stimulation on their bilateral trapezius muscle, after a 30-min typing task. Each intervention was administered at least 1 week apart. The analyzed limb was the dominant arm. Muscle hardness was assessed using a portable muscle hardness meter, as well as the skin temperature over the stimulated area. After each condition, the participants were asked for feedback regarding subjective improvement in refreshed feelings, muscle stiffness, and muscle fatigue using an 11-point numerical rating scale.

Results: With regard to muscle hardness, only the HC condition significantly decreased from 1.43 N to 1.37 N (d = 0.44, p < 0.05). Additionally, reduced muscle hardness in HC condition was associated with the degree of skin cooling during the intervention (cold max: r = 0.634, p < 0.01; cold change: r = -0.548, p < 0.05). Subjective improvement in refreshed feelings, muscle stiffness, and muscle fatigue was determined in the HC and heat stimulation conditions compared with the no stimulation condition (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Moreover, the HC condition showed significantly greater improvements in muscle stiffness and fatigue compared to the cold stimulation condition (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The current study demonstrated that HC promoted not only better subjective symptoms, such as muscle stiffness and fatigue, but also lesser muscle hardness. Furthermore, an association was observed between the degree of skin temperature cooling and reduced muscle hardness during HC. Further investigations on the ratio and intensity of cooling should be conducted in the future to establish the optimal HC protocol for muscle stiffness or fatigue.

Trial registration: UMIN000040620 . Registered 1 June 2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiological Anthropology
Journal of Physiological Anthropology Social Sciences-Human Factors and Ergonomics
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Physiological Anthropology (JPA) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research on the physiological functions of modern mankind, with an emphasis on the physical and bio-cultural effects on human adaptability to the current environment. The objective of JPA is to evaluate physiological adaptations to modern living environments, and to publish research from different scientific fields concerned with environmental impact on human life. Topic areas include, but are not limited to: environmental physiology bio-cultural environment living environment epigenetic adaptation development and growth age and sex differences nutrition and morphology physical fitness and health Journal of Physiological Anthropology is the official journal of the Japan Society of Physiological Anthropology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信