市场批准的用于皮肤癌筛查的人工智能移动健康应用程序的验证:一项前瞻性多中心诊断准确性研究

Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-04 DOI:10.1159/000520474
Tobias Sangers, Suzan Reeder, Sophie van der Vet, Sharan Jhingoer, Antien Mooyaart, Daniel M Siegel, Tamar Nijsten, Marlies Wakkee
{"title":"市场批准的用于皮肤癌筛查的人工智能移动健康应用程序的验证:一项前瞻性多中心诊断准确性研究","authors":"Tobias Sangers,&nbsp;Suzan Reeder,&nbsp;Sophie van der Vet,&nbsp;Sharan Jhingoer,&nbsp;Antien Mooyaart,&nbsp;Daniel M Siegel,&nbsp;Tamar Nijsten,&nbsp;Marlies Wakkee","doi":"10.1159/000520474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) consumer applications (apps) have been integrated with deep learning for skin cancer risk assessments. However, prospective validation of these apps is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the diagnostic accuracy of an app integrated with a convolutional neural network for the detection of premalignant and malignant skin lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective multicenter diagnostic accuracy study of a CE-marked mHealth app from January 1 until August 31, 2020, among adult patients with at least one suspicious skin lesion. Skin lesions were assessed by the app on an iOS or Android device after clinical diagnosis and before obtaining histopathology. The app outcome was compared to the histopathological diagnosis, or if not available, the clinical diagnosis by a dermatologist. The primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of the app to detect premalignant and malignant skin lesions. Subgroup analyses were conducted for different smartphone types, the lesion's origin, indication for dermatological consultation, and lesion location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 785 lesions, including 418 suspicious and 367 benign control lesions, among 372 patients (50.8% women) with a median age of 71 years were included. The app performed at an overall 86.9% (95% CI 82.3-90.7) sensitivity and 70.4% (95% CI 66.2-74.3) specificity. The sensitivity was significantly higher on the iOS device compared to the Android device (91.0 vs. 83.0%; p = 0.02). Specificity calculated on benign control lesions was significantly higher than suspicious skin lesions (80.1 vs. 45.5%; p < 0.001). Sensitivity was higher in skin fold areas compared to smooth skin areas (92.9 vs. 84.2%; p = 0.01), while the specificity was higher for lesions in smooth skin areas (72.0 vs. 56.6%; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of the mHealth app is far from perfect, but is potentially promising to empower patients to self-assess skin lesions before consulting a health care professional. An additional prospective validation study, particularly for suspicious pigmented skin lesions, is warranted. Furthermore, studies investigating mHealth implementation in the lay population are needed to demonstrate the impact on health care systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":144585,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":"649-656"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393821/pdf/","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Market-Approved Artificial Intelligence Mobile Health App for Skin Cancer Screening: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Sangers,&nbsp;Suzan Reeder,&nbsp;Sophie van der Vet,&nbsp;Sharan Jhingoer,&nbsp;Antien Mooyaart,&nbsp;Daniel M Siegel,&nbsp;Tamar Nijsten,&nbsp;Marlies Wakkee\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000520474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) consumer applications (apps) have been integrated with deep learning for skin cancer risk assessments. However, prospective validation of these apps is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the diagnostic accuracy of an app integrated with a convolutional neural network for the detection of premalignant and malignant skin lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective multicenter diagnostic accuracy study of a CE-marked mHealth app from January 1 until August 31, 2020, among adult patients with at least one suspicious skin lesion. Skin lesions were assessed by the app on an iOS or Android device after clinical diagnosis and before obtaining histopathology. The app outcome was compared to the histopathological diagnosis, or if not available, the clinical diagnosis by a dermatologist. The primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of the app to detect premalignant and malignant skin lesions. Subgroup analyses were conducted for different smartphone types, the lesion's origin, indication for dermatological consultation, and lesion location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 785 lesions, including 418 suspicious and 367 benign control lesions, among 372 patients (50.8% women) with a median age of 71 years were included. The app performed at an overall 86.9% (95% CI 82.3-90.7) sensitivity and 70.4% (95% CI 66.2-74.3) specificity. The sensitivity was significantly higher on the iOS device compared to the Android device (91.0 vs. 83.0%; p = 0.02). Specificity calculated on benign control lesions was significantly higher than suspicious skin lesions (80.1 vs. 45.5%; p < 0.001). Sensitivity was higher in skin fold areas compared to smooth skin areas (92.9 vs. 84.2%; p = 0.01), while the specificity was higher for lesions in smooth skin areas (72.0 vs. 56.6%; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of the mHealth app is far from perfect, but is potentially promising to empower patients to self-assess skin lesions before consulting a health care professional. An additional prospective validation study, particularly for suspicious pigmented skin lesions, is warranted. Furthermore, studies investigating mHealth implementation in the lay population are needed to demonstrate the impact on health care systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":144585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"649-656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9393821/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000520474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000520474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:移动健康(mHealth)消费者应用程序(app)已经与皮肤癌风险评估的深度学习相结合。然而,缺乏对这些应用程序的前瞻性验证。目的:确定与卷积神经网络集成的应用程序用于检测癌前和恶性皮肤病变的诊断准确性。方法:从2020年1月1日至8月31日,我们在至少有一个可疑皮肤病变的成年患者中对ce标记的移动健康应用程序进行了一项前瞻性多中心诊断准确性研究。在临床诊断后和获得组织病理学检查前,通过iOS或Android设备上的应用程序评估皮肤病变。将应用程序的结果与组织病理学诊断进行比较,如果无法获得,则与皮肤科医生的临床诊断进行比较。主要结果是应用程序检测癌前和恶性皮肤病变的敏感性和特异性。对不同智能手机类型、病变来源、皮肤科会诊指征和病变位置进行亚组分析。结果:372例患者(女性50.8%)共纳入785个病变,其中可疑病变418个,良性对照病变367个,中位年龄71岁。该应用程序的总体灵敏度为86.9% (95% CI 82.3-90.7),特异性为70.4% (95% CI 66.2-74.3)。iOS设备的敏感度明显高于Android设备(91.0 vs 83.0%;P = 0.02)。良性对照病变计算的特异性显著高于可疑皮肤病变(80.1 vs. 45.5%;P < 0.001)。与光滑皮肤区域相比,皮肤褶皱区域的敏感性更高(92.9 vs 84.2%;P = 0.01),而光滑皮肤区病变特异性更高(72.0比56.6%;P = 0.02)。结论:移动健康应用程序的诊断准确性远非完美,但有可能使患者在咨询医疗保健专业人员之前自我评估皮肤病变。一项额外的前瞻性验证研究,特别是可疑的色素皮肤病变,是必要的。此外,需要研究移动医疗在非专业人群中的实施情况,以证明对卫生保健系统的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of a Market-Approved Artificial Intelligence Mobile Health App for Skin Cancer Screening: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Validation of a Market-Approved Artificial Intelligence Mobile Health App for Skin Cancer Screening: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Validation of a Market-Approved Artificial Intelligence Mobile Health App for Skin Cancer Screening: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) consumer applications (apps) have been integrated with deep learning for skin cancer risk assessments. However, prospective validation of these apps is lacking.

Objectives: To identify the diagnostic accuracy of an app integrated with a convolutional neural network for the detection of premalignant and malignant skin lesions.

Methods: We performed a prospective multicenter diagnostic accuracy study of a CE-marked mHealth app from January 1 until August 31, 2020, among adult patients with at least one suspicious skin lesion. Skin lesions were assessed by the app on an iOS or Android device after clinical diagnosis and before obtaining histopathology. The app outcome was compared to the histopathological diagnosis, or if not available, the clinical diagnosis by a dermatologist. The primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of the app to detect premalignant and malignant skin lesions. Subgroup analyses were conducted for different smartphone types, the lesion's origin, indication for dermatological consultation, and lesion location.

Results: In total, 785 lesions, including 418 suspicious and 367 benign control lesions, among 372 patients (50.8% women) with a median age of 71 years were included. The app performed at an overall 86.9% (95% CI 82.3-90.7) sensitivity and 70.4% (95% CI 66.2-74.3) specificity. The sensitivity was significantly higher on the iOS device compared to the Android device (91.0 vs. 83.0%; p = 0.02). Specificity calculated on benign control lesions was significantly higher than suspicious skin lesions (80.1 vs. 45.5%; p < 0.001). Sensitivity was higher in skin fold areas compared to smooth skin areas (92.9 vs. 84.2%; p = 0.01), while the specificity was higher for lesions in smooth skin areas (72.0 vs. 56.6%; p = 0.02).

Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the mHealth app is far from perfect, but is potentially promising to empower patients to self-assess skin lesions before consulting a health care professional. An additional prospective validation study, particularly for suspicious pigmented skin lesions, is warranted. Furthermore, studies investigating mHealth implementation in the lay population are needed to demonstrate the impact on health care systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信