直肠拭子是评估结肠微生物组的可靠方法

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Greg Turner , Michael O’Grady , Daniel Hudson , Xochitl Morgan , Frank Frizelle , Rachel Purcell
{"title":"直肠拭子是评估结肠微生物组的可靠方法","authors":"Greg Turner ,&nbsp;Michael O’Grady ,&nbsp;Daniel Hudson ,&nbsp;Xochitl Morgan ,&nbsp;Frank Frizelle ,&nbsp;Rachel Purcell","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmm.2022.151549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Advances in genome sequencing have enabled detailed microbiome analysis; however, the ideal specimen type for sequencing is yet to be determined. Rectal swabs may offer a rapid and convenient modality for colonic microbiome analysis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of rectal swabs compared to faecal specimens.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and results</h3><p>Twenty health professionals participated in this study and provided a faecal specimen, a self-collected rectal swab and a rectal swab taken by a clinician. DNA was extracted and 16S rRNA gene sequencing was carried out for microbiome analysis.</p><p>Alpha diversity was higher in swabs compared to faecal specimens; however, the difference was only significant when comparing clinician-obtained swabs to faeces.</p><p>Analysis of beta diversity consistently showed that few taxa were affected by sample type. We found sample type accounted for only 6.8% of community variation (R2 = 0.067, p &lt; 0.001, permanova). Notably, there were only six genera identified in clinician-obtained swabs that were not also found in the self-taken swabs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both self-collected and clinician obtained rectal swabs are a reliable method of analysing the colonic microbiome. Obtaining specimens for microbiome analysis is often time-critical due to therapy, such as antibiotics, influencing the microbiome. Rectal swabs are shown to be a valid and convenient modality for microbiome analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50312,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Microbiology","volume":"312 2","pages":"Article 151549"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438422122000029/pdfft?md5=471aa0c44e6c251e0abaac9717582175&pid=1-s2.0-S1438422122000029-main.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rectal swabs are a reliable method of assessing the colonic microbiome\",\"authors\":\"Greg Turner ,&nbsp;Michael O’Grady ,&nbsp;Daniel Hudson ,&nbsp;Xochitl Morgan ,&nbsp;Frank Frizelle ,&nbsp;Rachel Purcell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmm.2022.151549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Advances in genome sequencing have enabled detailed microbiome analysis; however, the ideal specimen type for sequencing is yet to be determined. Rectal swabs may offer a rapid and convenient modality for colonic microbiome analysis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of rectal swabs compared to faecal specimens.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and results</h3><p>Twenty health professionals participated in this study and provided a faecal specimen, a self-collected rectal swab and a rectal swab taken by a clinician. DNA was extracted and 16S rRNA gene sequencing was carried out for microbiome analysis.</p><p>Alpha diversity was higher in swabs compared to faecal specimens; however, the difference was only significant when comparing clinician-obtained swabs to faeces.</p><p>Analysis of beta diversity consistently showed that few taxa were affected by sample type. We found sample type accounted for only 6.8% of community variation (R2 = 0.067, p &lt; 0.001, permanova). Notably, there were only six genera identified in clinician-obtained swabs that were not also found in the self-taken swabs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both self-collected and clinician obtained rectal swabs are a reliable method of analysing the colonic microbiome. Obtaining specimens for microbiome analysis is often time-critical due to therapy, such as antibiotics, influencing the microbiome. Rectal swabs are shown to be a valid and convenient modality for microbiome analysis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"312 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 151549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438422122000029/pdfft?md5=471aa0c44e6c251e0abaac9717582175&pid=1-s2.0-S1438422122000029-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438422122000029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438422122000029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

基因组测序的进步使详细的微生物组分析成为可能;然而,用于测序的理想标本类型尚未确定。直肠拭子可为结肠微生物组分析提供一种快速方便的方法。本研究的目的是评估直肠拭子与粪便标本的使用。方法与结果20名卫生专业人员参与了本研究,并提供了粪便标本、自行收集的直肠拭子和临床医生采集的直肠拭子。提取DNA,进行16S rRNA基因测序,进行微生物组分析。与粪便样本相比,拭子中的α多样性更高;然而,只有在将临床获得的拭子与粪便进行比较时,差异才显着。β多样性分析一致表明,受样本类型影响的分类群较少。我们发现样本类型仅占群落变异的6.8% (R2 = 0.067, p <0.001, permanova)。值得注意的是,在临床获得的拭子中鉴定出的只有6个属,这些属在自采拭子中也没有发现。结论自行收集的直肠拭子和临床获得的直肠拭子都是分析结肠微生物组的可靠方法。由于治疗(如抗生素)会影响微生物组,因此获取微生物组分析标本通常是时间紧迫的。直肠拭子被证明是一种有效和方便的微生物组分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rectal swabs are a reliable method of assessing the colonic microbiome

Background

Advances in genome sequencing have enabled detailed microbiome analysis; however, the ideal specimen type for sequencing is yet to be determined. Rectal swabs may offer a rapid and convenient modality for colonic microbiome analysis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of rectal swabs compared to faecal specimens.

Methods and results

Twenty health professionals participated in this study and provided a faecal specimen, a self-collected rectal swab and a rectal swab taken by a clinician. DNA was extracted and 16S rRNA gene sequencing was carried out for microbiome analysis.

Alpha diversity was higher in swabs compared to faecal specimens; however, the difference was only significant when comparing clinician-obtained swabs to faeces.

Analysis of beta diversity consistently showed that few taxa were affected by sample type. We found sample type accounted for only 6.8% of community variation (R2 = 0.067, p < 0.001, permanova). Notably, there were only six genera identified in clinician-obtained swabs that were not also found in the self-taken swabs.

Conclusions

Both self-collected and clinician obtained rectal swabs are a reliable method of analysing the colonic microbiome. Obtaining specimens for microbiome analysis is often time-critical due to therapy, such as antibiotics, influencing the microbiome. Rectal swabs are shown to be a valid and convenient modality for microbiome analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Pathogen genome sequencing projects have provided a wealth of data that need to be set in context to pathogenicity and the outcome of infections. In addition, the interplay between a pathogen and its host cell has become increasingly important to understand and interfere with diseases caused by microbial pathogens. IJMM meets these needs by focussing on genome and proteome analyses, studies dealing with the molecular mechanisms of pathogenicity and the evolution of pathogenic agents, the interactions between pathogens and host cells ("cellular microbiology"), and molecular epidemiology. To help the reader keeping up with the rapidly evolving new findings in the field of medical microbiology, IJMM publishes original articles, case studies and topical, state-of-the-art mini-reviews in a well balanced fashion. All articles are strictly peer-reviewed. Important topics are reinforced by 2 special issues per year dedicated to a particular theme. Finally, at irregular intervals, current opinions on recent or future developments in medical microbiology are presented in an editorial section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信