大枕神经阻滞对发作性偏头痛患者的预防作用:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验。

Nazila Malekian, Pouya B Bastani, Shahram Oveisgharan, Ghaemeh Nabaei, Siamak Abdi
{"title":"大枕神经阻滞对发作性偏头痛患者的预防作用:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验。","authors":"Nazila Malekian,&nbsp;Pouya B Bastani,&nbsp;Shahram Oveisgharan,&nbsp;Ghaemeh Nabaei,&nbsp;Siamak Abdi","doi":"10.1177/03331024211058182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since the data regarding the efficacy of greater occipital in episodic migraines are rare, we aimed to examine the efficacy of greater occipital block in the prophylaxis of episodic migraines without aura and compare different injectable drug regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, adult patients suffering from episodic migraines without aura were randomized to one of the following: triamcinolone, lidocaine, triamcinolone plus lidocaine, and saline. Patients were assessed at baseline, one week, two weeks, and four weeks after the injection for severity and duration of headaches and side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients completed the study. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated that the severity and duration decreased significantly after the greater occipital block (P < 0.001, P = 0.001 respectively) in all four groups. However, there was no difference between groups at any study time points (P > 0.05). In paired sample T-test, only groups 2 and 3 with lidocaine as a part of the injection showed a significant decrease in frequency compared to the baseline (P = 0.002, P = 0.019). Three patients reported side effects with a possible association with triamcinolone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater occipital block with a local anesthetic significantly decreases the number of attacks in episodic migraine, whereas no injection was superior to the placebo in regards to the duration and severity of the headaches.<b>Trial Registration Information:</b> Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT). Registration number: IRCT2017070334879N1. https://www.irct.ir/trial/26537.</p>","PeriodicalId":195255,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache","volume":" ","pages":"481-489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preventive effect of greater occipital nerve block on patients with episodic migraine: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nazila Malekian,&nbsp;Pouya B Bastani,&nbsp;Shahram Oveisgharan,&nbsp;Ghaemeh Nabaei,&nbsp;Siamak Abdi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03331024211058182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since the data regarding the efficacy of greater occipital in episodic migraines are rare, we aimed to examine the efficacy of greater occipital block in the prophylaxis of episodic migraines without aura and compare different injectable drug regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, adult patients suffering from episodic migraines without aura were randomized to one of the following: triamcinolone, lidocaine, triamcinolone plus lidocaine, and saline. Patients were assessed at baseline, one week, two weeks, and four weeks after the injection for severity and duration of headaches and side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients completed the study. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated that the severity and duration decreased significantly after the greater occipital block (P < 0.001, P = 0.001 respectively) in all four groups. However, there was no difference between groups at any study time points (P > 0.05). In paired sample T-test, only groups 2 and 3 with lidocaine as a part of the injection showed a significant decrease in frequency compared to the baseline (P = 0.002, P = 0.019). Three patients reported side effects with a possible association with triamcinolone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater occipital block with a local anesthetic significantly decreases the number of attacks in episodic migraine, whereas no injection was superior to the placebo in regards to the duration and severity of the headaches.<b>Trial Registration Information:</b> Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT). Registration number: IRCT2017070334879N1. https://www.irct.ir/trial/26537.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":195255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"481-489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211058182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211058182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:由于关于枕大阻滞治疗阵发性偏头痛的疗效的资料很少,我们的目的是研究枕大阻滞在预防无先兆发作性偏头痛中的疗效,并比较不同的注射药物方案。方法:在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,无先兆发作性偏头痛的成年患者被随机分为曲安奈德、利多卡因、曲安奈德加利多卡因和生理盐水。在基线、注射后1周、2周和4周评估患者头痛的严重程度和持续时间以及副作用。结果:55例患者完成了研究。重复测量方差分析显示,大枕骨阻滞后严重程度和持续时间显著降低(p0.05)。配对样本t检验中,与基线相比,只有注射利多卡因的第2组和第3组出现频率显著降低(P = 0.002, P = 0.019)。三名患者报告了可能与曲安奈德有关的副作用。结论:局部麻醉的大枕骨阻滞显著减少了发作性偏头痛的发作次数,而在头痛的持续时间和严重程度方面,没有注射优于安慰剂。试验注册信息:伊朗临床试验登记处(IRCT)。注册号:IRCT2017070334879N1。https://www.irct.ir/trial/26537。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preventive effect of greater occipital nerve block on patients with episodic migraine: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Objective: Since the data regarding the efficacy of greater occipital in episodic migraines are rare, we aimed to examine the efficacy of greater occipital block in the prophylaxis of episodic migraines without aura and compare different injectable drug regimens.

Methods: In a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, adult patients suffering from episodic migraines without aura were randomized to one of the following: triamcinolone, lidocaine, triamcinolone plus lidocaine, and saline. Patients were assessed at baseline, one week, two weeks, and four weeks after the injection for severity and duration of headaches and side effects.

Results: Fifty-five patients completed the study. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated that the severity and duration decreased significantly after the greater occipital block (P < 0.001, P = 0.001 respectively) in all four groups. However, there was no difference between groups at any study time points (P > 0.05). In paired sample T-test, only groups 2 and 3 with lidocaine as a part of the injection showed a significant decrease in frequency compared to the baseline (P = 0.002, P = 0.019). Three patients reported side effects with a possible association with triamcinolone.

Conclusion: Greater occipital block with a local anesthetic significantly decreases the number of attacks in episodic migraine, whereas no injection was superior to the placebo in regards to the duration and severity of the headaches.Trial Registration Information: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT). Registration number: IRCT2017070334879N1. https://www.irct.ir/trial/26537.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信