智能手机下肢运动测量应用的可靠性和有效性各不相同:一项系统综述。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Sarah Hahn, Inga Kröger, Steffen Willwacher, Peter Augat
{"title":"智能手机下肢运动测量应用的可靠性和有效性各不相同:一项系统综述。","authors":"Sarah Hahn,&nbsp;Inga Kröger,&nbsp;Steffen Willwacher,&nbsp;Peter Augat","doi":"10.1515/bmt-2021-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this review was to determine whether smartphone applications are reliable and valid to measure range of motion (RoM) in lower extremity joints. A literature search was performed up to October 2020 in the databases PubMed and Cochrane Library. Studies that reported reliability or validity of smartphone applications for RoM measurements were included. The study quality was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool and baseline information, validity and reliability were extracted. Twenty-five studies were included in the review. Eighteen studies examined knee RoM, whereof two apps were analysed as having good to excellent reliability and validity for knee flexion (\"DrGoniometer\", \"Angle\") and one app showed good results for knee extension (\"DrGoniometer\"). Eight studies analysed ankle RoM. One of these apps showed good intra-rater reliability and excellent validity for dorsiflexion RoM (\"iHandy level\"), another app showed excellent reliability and moderate validity for plantarflexion RoM (\"Coach's Eye\"). All other apps concerning lower extremity RoM had either insufficient results, lacked study quality or were no longer available. Some apps are reliable and valid to measure RoM in the knee and ankle joint. No app can be recommended for hip RoM measurement without restrictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8900,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik","volume":"66 6","pages":"537-555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity varies among smartphone apps for range of motion measurements of the lower extremity: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Hahn,&nbsp;Inga Kröger,&nbsp;Steffen Willwacher,&nbsp;Peter Augat\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/bmt-2021-0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this review was to determine whether smartphone applications are reliable and valid to measure range of motion (RoM) in lower extremity joints. A literature search was performed up to October 2020 in the databases PubMed and Cochrane Library. Studies that reported reliability or validity of smartphone applications for RoM measurements were included. The study quality was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool and baseline information, validity and reliability were extracted. Twenty-five studies were included in the review. Eighteen studies examined knee RoM, whereof two apps were analysed as having good to excellent reliability and validity for knee flexion (\\\"DrGoniometer\\\", \\\"Angle\\\") and one app showed good results for knee extension (\\\"DrGoniometer\\\"). Eight studies analysed ankle RoM. One of these apps showed good intra-rater reliability and excellent validity for dorsiflexion RoM (\\\"iHandy level\\\"), another app showed excellent reliability and moderate validity for plantarflexion RoM (\\\"Coach's Eye\\\"). All other apps concerning lower extremity RoM had either insufficient results, lacked study quality or were no longer available. Some apps are reliable and valid to measure RoM in the knee and ankle joint. No app can be recommended for hip RoM measurement without restrictions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik\",\"volume\":\"66 6\",\"pages\":\"537-555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2021-0015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2021-0015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本综述的目的是确定智能手机应用程序是否可靠和有效地测量下肢关节的活动范围(RoM)。在PubMed和Cochrane Library数据库中进行了截至2020年10月的文献检索。研究报告的可靠性或有效性的智能手机应用程序的RoM测量包括在内。采用QUADAS-2工具评估研究质量,提取基线信息、效度和信度。本综述纳入了25项研究。18项研究检查了膝关节RoM,其中两个应用程序被分析为对膝关节屈曲(“DrGoniometer”,“Angle”)具有良好的可靠性和有效性,一个应用程序对膝关节伸展(“DrGoniometer”)具有良好的效果。8项研究分析了踝关节关节活动度。其中一个应用程序对背屈关节活动度(“iHandy水平”)显示出良好的内部信度和良好的效度,另一个应用程序对跖屈关节活动度(“Coach’s Eye”)显示出良好的信度和中等的效度。所有其他关于下肢RoM的应用程序要么结果不充分,要么缺乏研究质量,要么不再可用。一些应用程序可以可靠有效地测量膝关节和踝关节的RoM。没有任何应用程序可以毫无限制地推荐用于髋关节RoM测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and validity varies among smartphone apps for range of motion measurements of the lower extremity: a systematic review.

The aim of this review was to determine whether smartphone applications are reliable and valid to measure range of motion (RoM) in lower extremity joints. A literature search was performed up to October 2020 in the databases PubMed and Cochrane Library. Studies that reported reliability or validity of smartphone applications for RoM measurements were included. The study quality was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool and baseline information, validity and reliability were extracted. Twenty-five studies were included in the review. Eighteen studies examined knee RoM, whereof two apps were analysed as having good to excellent reliability and validity for knee flexion ("DrGoniometer", "Angle") and one app showed good results for knee extension ("DrGoniometer"). Eight studies analysed ankle RoM. One of these apps showed good intra-rater reliability and excellent validity for dorsiflexion RoM ("iHandy level"), another app showed excellent reliability and moderate validity for plantarflexion RoM ("Coach's Eye"). All other apps concerning lower extremity RoM had either insufficient results, lacked study quality or were no longer available. Some apps are reliable and valid to measure RoM in the knee and ankle joint. No app can be recommended for hip RoM measurement without restrictions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik (BMT) is a high-quality forum for the exchange of knowledge in the fields of biomedical engineering, medical information technology and biotechnology/bioengineering. As an established journal with a tradition of more than 60 years, BMT addresses engineers, natural scientists, and clinicians working in research, industry, or clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信