胸部ct不同层厚评价COVID-19相关性肺炎的比较

IF 0.8 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Dilara Atasoy, Nazım Çetinkaya, Halil Çaylak, Rağıp Sarıismailoğlu, Mehmet Haydar Atalar
{"title":"胸部ct不同层厚评价COVID-19相关性肺炎的比较","authors":"Dilara Atasoy,&nbsp;Nazım Çetinkaya,&nbsp;Halil Çaylak,&nbsp;Rağıp Sarıismailoğlu,&nbsp;Mehmet Haydar Atalar","doi":"10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2022.21120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the value of chest computed tomography at 1-mm and 5-mm slice thickness in terms of computed tomography severity score and computed tomography evaluation time in the diagnosis of COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sixty-five patients were included in the study group who are reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction-positive for COVID-19 and had chest computed tomography. The 1 mm and 5 mm reconstructed images were evaluated in 2 different sessions with 4-week intervals by 2 certificated general radiologists. The presence of COVID-19-related findings, COVID-19 final category, and evaluation time were recorded. Thin and thick slices were compared for these variables and inter-reader reliability calculated with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the COVID-19-related findings on thorax computed tomography between 1-mm and 5-mm slices except crazy paving appearance, microvascular enlargement, and septal thickening. The frequency of the final categories of computed tomography results was consistent between the thick and thin slices. The computed tomography assessment time was significantly lower in 5 mm slices. The inter-reader reproducibility analysis results demonstrated good and excellent reproducibility of measurements between readers for both slice thicknesses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was found that 5-mm reconstruction thickness of chest computed tomography can be employed for the initial detection of COVID-19-related findings and the final diagnostic category-related COVID-19 rather than 1-mm slices with a faster availability of results which can be beneficial on pandemic hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":37452,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Thoracic Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"32-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f1/ad/ttj-23-1-32.PMC9449893.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Slice Thicknesses on Chest Computed Tomography for Evaluation of COVID-19- Associated Pneumonia.\",\"authors\":\"Dilara Atasoy,&nbsp;Nazım Çetinkaya,&nbsp;Halil Çaylak,&nbsp;Rağıp Sarıismailoğlu,&nbsp;Mehmet Haydar Atalar\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2022.21120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the value of chest computed tomography at 1-mm and 5-mm slice thickness in terms of computed tomography severity score and computed tomography evaluation time in the diagnosis of COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sixty-five patients were included in the study group who are reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction-positive for COVID-19 and had chest computed tomography. The 1 mm and 5 mm reconstructed images were evaluated in 2 different sessions with 4-week intervals by 2 certificated general radiologists. The presence of COVID-19-related findings, COVID-19 final category, and evaluation time were recorded. Thin and thick slices were compared for these variables and inter-reader reliability calculated with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the COVID-19-related findings on thorax computed tomography between 1-mm and 5-mm slices except crazy paving appearance, microvascular enlargement, and septal thickening. The frequency of the final categories of computed tomography results was consistent between the thick and thin slices. The computed tomography assessment time was significantly lower in 5 mm slices. The inter-reader reproducibility analysis results demonstrated good and excellent reproducibility of measurements between readers for both slice thicknesses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was found that 5-mm reconstruction thickness of chest computed tomography can be employed for the initial detection of COVID-19-related findings and the final diagnostic category-related COVID-19 rather than 1-mm slices with a faster availability of results which can be beneficial on pandemic hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Thoracic Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"32-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f1/ad/ttj-23-1-32.PMC9449893.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Thoracic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2022.21120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Thoracic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2022.21120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较1 mm和5 mm层厚胸部ct在ct严重程度评分和ct评价时间对COVID-19诊断的价值。材料和方法:研究组纳入65例COVID-19逆转录聚合酶链反应阳性并进行胸部计算机断层扫描的患者。1毫米和5毫米的重建图像由2名有资格的普通放射科医生在2个不同的疗程中评估,间隔4周。记录与COVID-19相关的发现、COVID-19的最终类别和评估时间。对这些变量进行薄切片和厚切片的比较,并使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS for Windows)计算读者间信度。结果:胸腔ct 1-mm片与5-mm片除出现狂铺样、微血管肿大、间隔增厚外,无明显差异。计算机断层扫描结果的最终分类频率在厚片和薄片之间是一致的。5 mm切片的ct评估时间明显缩短。阅读器间再现性分析结果表明,阅读器之间的测量具有良好的再现性。结论:与1 mm切片相比,5 mm胸部ct重建厚度可用于COVID-19相关症状的初步发现和最终诊断类别相关的COVID-19,可更快获得结果,有利于大流行医院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Different Slice Thicknesses on Chest Computed Tomography for Evaluation of COVID-19- Associated Pneumonia.

Comparison of Different Slice Thicknesses on Chest Computed Tomography for Evaluation of COVID-19- Associated Pneumonia.

Comparison of Different Slice Thicknesses on Chest Computed Tomography for Evaluation of COVID-19- Associated Pneumonia.

Comparison of Different Slice Thicknesses on Chest Computed Tomography for Evaluation of COVID-19- Associated Pneumonia.

Objective: To compare the value of chest computed tomography at 1-mm and 5-mm slice thickness in terms of computed tomography severity score and computed tomography evaluation time in the diagnosis of COVID-19.

Material and methods: Sixty-five patients were included in the study group who are reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction-positive for COVID-19 and had chest computed tomography. The 1 mm and 5 mm reconstructed images were evaluated in 2 different sessions with 4-week intervals by 2 certificated general radiologists. The presence of COVID-19-related findings, COVID-19 final category, and evaluation time were recorded. Thin and thick slices were compared for these variables and inter-reader reliability calculated with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows.

Results: There was no significant difference between the COVID-19-related findings on thorax computed tomography between 1-mm and 5-mm slices except crazy paving appearance, microvascular enlargement, and septal thickening. The frequency of the final categories of computed tomography results was consistent between the thick and thin slices. The computed tomography assessment time was significantly lower in 5 mm slices. The inter-reader reproducibility analysis results demonstrated good and excellent reproducibility of measurements between readers for both slice thicknesses.

Conclusion: It was found that 5-mm reconstruction thickness of chest computed tomography can be employed for the initial detection of COVID-19-related findings and the final diagnostic category-related COVID-19 rather than 1-mm slices with a faster availability of results which can be beneficial on pandemic hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Thoracic Journal
Turkish Thoracic Journal Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Turkish Thoracic Journal (Turk Thorac J) is the double-blind, peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of Turkish Thoracic Society. The journal is a quarterly publication, published on January, April, July, and October and its publication language is English. Turkish Thoracic Journal started its publication life following the merger of two journals which were published under the titles “Turkish Respiratory Journal” and “Toraks Journal” until 2007. Archives of both journals were passed on to the Turkish Thoracic Journal. The aim of the journal is to convey scientific developments and to create a dynamic discussion platform about pulmonary diseases. With this intent, the journal accepts articles from all related scientific areas that address adult and pediatric pulmonary diseases, as well as thoracic imaging, environmental and occupational disorders, intensive care, sleep disorders and thoracic surgery. Clinical and research articles, reviews, statements of agreement or disagreement on controversial issues, national and international consensus reports, abstracts and comments of important international articles, interesting case reports, writings related to clinical and practical applications, letters to the editor, and editorials are accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信