秋水仙碱治疗与冠心病患者临床结局的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析

European cardiology Pub Date : 2021-10-21 eCollection Date: 2021-02-01 DOI:10.15420/ecr.2021.31
Francesco Condello, Matteo Sturla, Bernhard Reimers, Gaetano Liccardo, Giulio G Stefanini, Gianluigi Condorelli, Giuseppe Ferrante
{"title":"秋水仙碱治疗与冠心病患者临床结局的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Francesco Condello,&nbsp;Matteo Sturla,&nbsp;Bernhard Reimers,&nbsp;Gaetano Liccardo,&nbsp;Giulio G Stefanini,&nbsp;Gianluigi Condorelli,&nbsp;Giuseppe Ferrante","doi":"10.15420/ecr.2021.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The authors examined the association between colchicine treatment and clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. <b>Methods:</b> They performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with coronary artery disease receiving addon colchicine to standard treatment compared with standard treatment. They used a mixed-effects Poisson regression model with random intervention effects to estimate the pooled incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% CI. <b>Results:</b> Ten RCTs were identified, including 12,819 participants followed up for a median of 6 months. Colchicine was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (IRR 0.69; 95% CI [0.60-0.79]; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome [NNTB] = 28); MI (IRR 0.77; 95% CI [0.64-0.93]; NNTB = 95) and ischaemic stroke (IRR 0.48; 95% CI [0.30-0.76]; NNTB = 155) and with a higher risk of gastrointestinal adverse events (IRR 1.69; 95% CI [1.12-2.54]; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome [NNTH] = 10). Colchicine did not affect all-cause death (IRR 1.09; 95% CI [0.85-1.40]), or cardiovascular death (IRR 0.75; 95% CI [0.51-1.12]), while it was associated with a higher risk of non-cardiovascular death (IRR 1.45; 95% CI [1.04-2.02]; NNTH = 396). <b>Conclusion:</b> The meta-analysis showed that the relative and absolute beneficial treatment effects of colchicine on cardiovascular outcomes outweigh the potential harm for non-cardiovascular mortality. <b>Registration:</b> PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021248874.</p>","PeriodicalId":93994,"journal":{"name":"European cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/a0/ecr-16-e39.PMC8576482.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Colchicine Treatment and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Condello,&nbsp;Matteo Sturla,&nbsp;Bernhard Reimers,&nbsp;Gaetano Liccardo,&nbsp;Giulio G Stefanini,&nbsp;Gianluigi Condorelli,&nbsp;Giuseppe Ferrante\",\"doi\":\"10.15420/ecr.2021.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The authors examined the association between colchicine treatment and clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. <b>Methods:</b> They performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with coronary artery disease receiving addon colchicine to standard treatment compared with standard treatment. They used a mixed-effects Poisson regression model with random intervention effects to estimate the pooled incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% CI. <b>Results:</b> Ten RCTs were identified, including 12,819 participants followed up for a median of 6 months. Colchicine was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (IRR 0.69; 95% CI [0.60-0.79]; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome [NNTB] = 28); MI (IRR 0.77; 95% CI [0.64-0.93]; NNTB = 95) and ischaemic stroke (IRR 0.48; 95% CI [0.30-0.76]; NNTB = 155) and with a higher risk of gastrointestinal adverse events (IRR 1.69; 95% CI [1.12-2.54]; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome [NNTH] = 10). Colchicine did not affect all-cause death (IRR 1.09; 95% CI [0.85-1.40]), or cardiovascular death (IRR 0.75; 95% CI [0.51-1.12]), while it was associated with a higher risk of non-cardiovascular death (IRR 1.45; 95% CI [1.04-2.02]; NNTH = 396). <b>Conclusion:</b> The meta-analysis showed that the relative and absolute beneficial treatment effects of colchicine on cardiovascular outcomes outweigh the potential harm for non-cardiovascular mortality. <b>Registration:</b> PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021248874.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/a0/ecr-16-e39.PMC8576482.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2021.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2021.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:作者研究了秋水仙碱治疗与冠心病患者临床结局之间的关系。方法:他们对接受秋水仙碱标准治疗与标准治疗的冠心病患者进行了随机对照试验(RCTs)的荟萃分析。他们使用随机干预效应的混合效应泊松回归模型来估计95% CI的合并发病率比(IRR)。结果:纳入10项随机对照试验,包括12819名参与者,随访时间中位数为6个月。秋水仙碱与较低的主要不良心血管事件风险相关(IRR 0.69;95% ci [0.60-0.79];获得额外有益结果所需治疗的人数[NNTB] = 28);Mi (irr 0.77;95% ci [0.64-0.93];NNTB = 95)和缺血性卒中(IRR 0.48;95% ci [0.30-0.76];NNTB = 155),胃肠道不良事件风险较高(IRR 1.69;95% ci [1.12-2.54];需要治疗额外有害结果的人数[NNTH] = 10)。秋水仙碱不影响全因死亡(IRR 1.09;95% CI[0.85-1.40])或心血管死亡(IRR 0.75;95% CI[0.51-1.12]),而与较高的非心血管死亡风险相关(IRR 1.45;95% ci [1.04-2.02];NNTH = 396)。结论:荟萃分析显示秋水仙碱对心血管预后的相对和绝对有益治疗效果大于对非心血管死亡率的潜在危害。注册号:PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021248874。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association Between Colchicine Treatment and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Association Between Colchicine Treatment and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Association Between Colchicine Treatment and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Association Between Colchicine Treatment and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: The authors examined the association between colchicine treatment and clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. Methods: They performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with coronary artery disease receiving addon colchicine to standard treatment compared with standard treatment. They used a mixed-effects Poisson regression model with random intervention effects to estimate the pooled incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% CI. Results: Ten RCTs were identified, including 12,819 participants followed up for a median of 6 months. Colchicine was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (IRR 0.69; 95% CI [0.60-0.79]; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome [NNTB] = 28); MI (IRR 0.77; 95% CI [0.64-0.93]; NNTB = 95) and ischaemic stroke (IRR 0.48; 95% CI [0.30-0.76]; NNTB = 155) and with a higher risk of gastrointestinal adverse events (IRR 1.69; 95% CI [1.12-2.54]; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome [NNTH] = 10). Colchicine did not affect all-cause death (IRR 1.09; 95% CI [0.85-1.40]), or cardiovascular death (IRR 0.75; 95% CI [0.51-1.12]), while it was associated with a higher risk of non-cardiovascular death (IRR 1.45; 95% CI [1.04-2.02]; NNTH = 396). Conclusion: The meta-analysis showed that the relative and absolute beneficial treatment effects of colchicine on cardiovascular outcomes outweigh the potential harm for non-cardiovascular mortality. Registration: PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021248874.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信