治疗性抗凝和预防性抗凝在累及股隐交界处的浅静脉血栓患者中的预后无差异。

Vascular Medicine (London, England) Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-30 DOI:10.1177/1358863X211066962
Paolo Prandoni, Raffaele Pesavento, Franca Bilora, José Luis Fernández Reyes, Olga Madridano, Silvia Soler, Manuel Monreal
{"title":"治疗性抗凝和预防性抗凝在累及股隐交界处的浅静脉血栓患者中的预后无差异。","authors":"Paolo Prandoni, Raffaele Pesavento, Franca Bilora, José Luis Fernández Reyes, Olga Madridano, Silvia Soler, Manuel Monreal","doi":"10.1177/1358863X211066962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the demonstration that thrombosis involving the superficial veins of the lower extremities (SVT) is a less benign disease than previously thought,1 several controlled studies have consistently shown that fondaparinux in preventive doses, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in intermediate doses, and rivaroxaban in preventive doses are effective and safe strategies for preventing extension or recurrence of the disease, as well as progression to the deep vein system and migration to the pulmonary circulation.2-6 In all these clinical trials, patients with the thrombus head within 3 cm from the saphenous–femoral junction were not eligible for recruitment, as they were perceived as being at a higher risk of venous thromboembolic complications in the absence of an active drug, nor were they in studies addressing the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) because of the lack of involvement of the deep vein system. Accordingly, which is the most proper therapeutic conduct in these patients is unknown. International guidelines are elusive in this regard.7,8 Although most physicians end up managing these patients with therapeutic doses of anticoagulants because of the feared risk of progression to the deep vein system, as far as we know there is no evidence of treatment failure coming from the long-term follow-up of patients managed with lower doses. Here we report the findings from an international registry. The Computerized Registry of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism (RIETE) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02832245) is a large prospective registry that has been enrolling patients with objectively confirmed VTE since 2001.9 The main objective of RIETE is to provide information to help physicians to improve their knowledge on the natural history of thromboembolic disease, including epidemiologic, diagnostic, prophylactic, and therapeutic information. All enrollees provide written or verbal informed consent according to the local ethics protocols of enrolling centers. The institutional review board at each enrolling center approves participation in RIETE for the site investigators and allows the entry of de-identified patient information into the RIETE database. Out of 1320 patients with isolated SVT (i.e., without simultaneous involvement of the deep venous system, as assessed by systematic bilateral ultrasonography) who were enrolled in the RIETE registry between March 2015 and June 2021, 374 (28.3%) had a thrombosis involving the most proximal tract of the greater saphenous with the thrombus head being within 3 cm from the saphenous–femoral junction. Of these patients, 227 (60.7%) were managed with full-dose LMWH or therapeutic doses of fondaparinux overlapped with and/or followed by vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants. The remaining 147 patients (39.3%) were managed with preventive doses of fondaparinux or intermediate-dose LMWH. Table 1 illustrates the main demographic and clinical characteristics of the recruited patients, as well as the main risk factors of thrombosis, which were fully comparable between the two study No difference in outcome between therapeutic and preventive anticoagulation in patients with superficial vein thrombosis involving the saphenous–femoral junction","PeriodicalId":151049,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"290-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No difference in outcome between therapeutic and preventive anticoagulation in patients with superficial vein thrombosis involving the saphenous-femoral junction.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Prandoni, Raffaele Pesavento, Franca Bilora, José Luis Fernández Reyes, Olga Madridano, Silvia Soler, Manuel Monreal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1358863X211066962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the demonstration that thrombosis involving the superficial veins of the lower extremities (SVT) is a less benign disease than previously thought,1 several controlled studies have consistently shown that fondaparinux in preventive doses, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in intermediate doses, and rivaroxaban in preventive doses are effective and safe strategies for preventing extension or recurrence of the disease, as well as progression to the deep vein system and migration to the pulmonary circulation.2-6 In all these clinical trials, patients with the thrombus head within 3 cm from the saphenous–femoral junction were not eligible for recruitment, as they were perceived as being at a higher risk of venous thromboembolic complications in the absence of an active drug, nor were they in studies addressing the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) because of the lack of involvement of the deep vein system. Accordingly, which is the most proper therapeutic conduct in these patients is unknown. International guidelines are elusive in this regard.7,8 Although most physicians end up managing these patients with therapeutic doses of anticoagulants because of the feared risk of progression to the deep vein system, as far as we know there is no evidence of treatment failure coming from the long-term follow-up of patients managed with lower doses. Here we report the findings from an international registry. The Computerized Registry of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism (RIETE) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02832245) is a large prospective registry that has been enrolling patients with objectively confirmed VTE since 2001.9 The main objective of RIETE is to provide information to help physicians to improve their knowledge on the natural history of thromboembolic disease, including epidemiologic, diagnostic, prophylactic, and therapeutic information. All enrollees provide written or verbal informed consent according to the local ethics protocols of enrolling centers. The institutional review board at each enrolling center approves participation in RIETE for the site investigators and allows the entry of de-identified patient information into the RIETE database. Out of 1320 patients with isolated SVT (i.e., without simultaneous involvement of the deep venous system, as assessed by systematic bilateral ultrasonography) who were enrolled in the RIETE registry between March 2015 and June 2021, 374 (28.3%) had a thrombosis involving the most proximal tract of the greater saphenous with the thrombus head being within 3 cm from the saphenous–femoral junction. Of these patients, 227 (60.7%) were managed with full-dose LMWH or therapeutic doses of fondaparinux overlapped with and/or followed by vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants. The remaining 147 patients (39.3%) were managed with preventive doses of fondaparinux or intermediate-dose LMWH. Table 1 illustrates the main demographic and clinical characteristics of the recruited patients, as well as the main risk factors of thrombosis, which were fully comparable between the two study No difference in outcome between therapeutic and preventive anticoagulation in patients with superficial vein thrombosis involving the saphenous–femoral junction\",\"PeriodicalId\":151049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular Medicine (London, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"290-292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular Medicine (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X211066962\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Medicine (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X211066962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No difference in outcome between therapeutic and preventive anticoagulation in patients with superficial vein thrombosis involving the saphenous-femoral junction.
Following the demonstration that thrombosis involving the superficial veins of the lower extremities (SVT) is a less benign disease than previously thought,1 several controlled studies have consistently shown that fondaparinux in preventive doses, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in intermediate doses, and rivaroxaban in preventive doses are effective and safe strategies for preventing extension or recurrence of the disease, as well as progression to the deep vein system and migration to the pulmonary circulation.2-6 In all these clinical trials, patients with the thrombus head within 3 cm from the saphenous–femoral junction were not eligible for recruitment, as they were perceived as being at a higher risk of venous thromboembolic complications in the absence of an active drug, nor were they in studies addressing the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) because of the lack of involvement of the deep vein system. Accordingly, which is the most proper therapeutic conduct in these patients is unknown. International guidelines are elusive in this regard.7,8 Although most physicians end up managing these patients with therapeutic doses of anticoagulants because of the feared risk of progression to the deep vein system, as far as we know there is no evidence of treatment failure coming from the long-term follow-up of patients managed with lower doses. Here we report the findings from an international registry. The Computerized Registry of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism (RIETE) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02832245) is a large prospective registry that has been enrolling patients with objectively confirmed VTE since 2001.9 The main objective of RIETE is to provide information to help physicians to improve their knowledge on the natural history of thromboembolic disease, including epidemiologic, diagnostic, prophylactic, and therapeutic information. All enrollees provide written or verbal informed consent according to the local ethics protocols of enrolling centers. The institutional review board at each enrolling center approves participation in RIETE for the site investigators and allows the entry of de-identified patient information into the RIETE database. Out of 1320 patients with isolated SVT (i.e., without simultaneous involvement of the deep venous system, as assessed by systematic bilateral ultrasonography) who were enrolled in the RIETE registry between March 2015 and June 2021, 374 (28.3%) had a thrombosis involving the most proximal tract of the greater saphenous with the thrombus head being within 3 cm from the saphenous–femoral junction. Of these patients, 227 (60.7%) were managed with full-dose LMWH or therapeutic doses of fondaparinux overlapped with and/or followed by vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants. The remaining 147 patients (39.3%) were managed with preventive doses of fondaparinux or intermediate-dose LMWH. Table 1 illustrates the main demographic and clinical characteristics of the recruited patients, as well as the main risk factors of thrombosis, which were fully comparable between the two study No difference in outcome between therapeutic and preventive anticoagulation in patients with superficial vein thrombosis involving the saphenous–femoral junction
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信