COVID-19大流行后的内窥镜检查-会有什么不同?

Rashid N Lui, Raymond S Y Tang, Philip W Y Chiu
{"title":"COVID-19大流行后的内窥镜检查-会有什么不同?","authors":"Rashid N Lui,&nbsp;Raymond S Y Tang,&nbsp;Philip W Y Chiu","doi":"10.1007/s11938-022-00370-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This paper reviews the latest literature regarding the impact of COVID on endoscopy service provision.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Endoscopy has been shown to be largely safe when appropriate infection prevention and control measures are in place. Endoscopy training and education has been profoundly affected though novel training models to overcome this have been developed. Proper handling of delayed or cancelled procedures is of utmost importance to minimize delays in diagnosis and treatment of diseases such as cancer. Adoption of new technologies such as non-endoscopy alternatives and telehealth may be a viable alternative to minimize infection risks.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This pandemic has led to tangible differences in how we provide endoscopy service in the future. Future research focusing on better risk stratification of patients who need endoscopy, validating novel endoscopy training models, and adopting new technologies are urgently needed to support these changes in the post-pandemic world.</p>","PeriodicalId":10998,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology","volume":"20 1","pages":"46-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789548/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopy After the COVID-19 Pandemic-What Will Be Different?\",\"authors\":\"Rashid N Lui,&nbsp;Raymond S Y Tang,&nbsp;Philip W Y Chiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11938-022-00370-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This paper reviews the latest literature regarding the impact of COVID on endoscopy service provision.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Endoscopy has been shown to be largely safe when appropriate infection prevention and control measures are in place. Endoscopy training and education has been profoundly affected though novel training models to overcome this have been developed. Proper handling of delayed or cancelled procedures is of utmost importance to minimize delays in diagnosis and treatment of diseases such as cancer. Adoption of new technologies such as non-endoscopy alternatives and telehealth may be a viable alternative to minimize infection risks.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This pandemic has led to tangible differences in how we provide endoscopy service in the future. Future research focusing on better risk stratification of patients who need endoscopy, validating novel endoscopy training models, and adopting new technologies are urgently needed to support these changes in the post-pandemic world.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"46-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789548/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-022-00370-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-022-00370-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

综述目的:本文综述了新冠肺炎对内镜服务提供影响的最新文献。最近的发现:当适当的感染预防和控制措施到位时,内窥镜检查在很大程度上是安全的。内窥镜培训和教育受到了深刻的影响,尽管已经开发出新的培训模式来克服这一问题。为了最大限度地减少癌症等疾病的诊断和治疗延误,正确处理延迟或取消的程序是至关重要的。采用诸如非内窥镜检查替代方案和远程保健等新技术可能是尽量减少感染风险的可行替代方案。总结:这次大流行导致我们在未来如何提供内窥镜检查服务方面发生了切实的变化。未来迫切需要开展研究,对需要内窥镜检查的患者进行更好的风险分层,验证新的内窥镜检查培训模式,并采用新技术,以支持大流行后世界的这些变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Endoscopy After the COVID-19 Pandemic-What Will Be Different?

Endoscopy After the COVID-19 Pandemic-What Will Be Different?

Endoscopy After the COVID-19 Pandemic-What Will Be Different?

Purpose of review: This paper reviews the latest literature regarding the impact of COVID on endoscopy service provision.

Recent findings: Endoscopy has been shown to be largely safe when appropriate infection prevention and control measures are in place. Endoscopy training and education has been profoundly affected though novel training models to overcome this have been developed. Proper handling of delayed or cancelled procedures is of utmost importance to minimize delays in diagnosis and treatment of diseases such as cancer. Adoption of new technologies such as non-endoscopy alternatives and telehealth may be a viable alternative to minimize infection risks.

Summary: This pandemic has led to tangible differences in how we provide endoscopy service in the future. Future research focusing on better risk stratification of patients who need endoscopy, validating novel endoscopy training models, and adopting new technologies are urgently needed to support these changes in the post-pandemic world.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信