测量和报告狗的地面反作用力的最佳实践。

Veterinary surgery : VS Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-26 DOI:10.1111/vsu.13772
Michael G Conzemius, Bryan T Torres, Peter Muir, Richard Evans, Ursula Krotscheck, Steven Budsberg
{"title":"测量和报告狗的地面反作用力的最佳实践。","authors":"Michael G Conzemius,&nbsp;Bryan T Torres,&nbsp;Peter Muir,&nbsp;Richard Evans,&nbsp;Ursula Krotscheck,&nbsp;Steven Budsberg","doi":"10.1111/vsu.13772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kinetic gait analysis and ground reaction forces (GRFs) have been used in hundreds of scientific manuscripts. Specific methodology, interpretation of results, and translation to clinical veterinary medicine have been inconsistent. This impedes the advance of veterinary medicine and poses a risk to patients. The objective of this report was to address methodological variations and share our consensus on a recommended approach with viable alternatives to data collection methods, analysis, reporting, and interpretation for GRFs in the dog. Investigators with experience performing kinetic gait analysis reviewed the literature and discussed the topics that most influenced GRF data collection, reporting, and interpretation. Methodological variations were reported and a consensus from the group was devised. There are several reasonable alternatives to collect, report, and interpret GRFs in dogs appropriately. Attention to detail is required in several areas to collect and report them. This review and consensus report should assist future investigations and interpretations of studies, optimize comparison between publications, minimize use of animals, and limit the investment in cost and time.</p>","PeriodicalId":123280,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary surgery : VS","volume":" ","pages":"385-396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best practices for measuring and reporting ground reaction forces in dogs.\",\"authors\":\"Michael G Conzemius,&nbsp;Bryan T Torres,&nbsp;Peter Muir,&nbsp;Richard Evans,&nbsp;Ursula Krotscheck,&nbsp;Steven Budsberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vsu.13772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Kinetic gait analysis and ground reaction forces (GRFs) have been used in hundreds of scientific manuscripts. Specific methodology, interpretation of results, and translation to clinical veterinary medicine have been inconsistent. This impedes the advance of veterinary medicine and poses a risk to patients. The objective of this report was to address methodological variations and share our consensus on a recommended approach with viable alternatives to data collection methods, analysis, reporting, and interpretation for GRFs in the dog. Investigators with experience performing kinetic gait analysis reviewed the literature and discussed the topics that most influenced GRF data collection, reporting, and interpretation. Methodological variations were reported and a consensus from the group was devised. There are several reasonable alternatives to collect, report, and interpret GRFs in dogs appropriately. Attention to detail is required in several areas to collect and report them. This review and consensus report should assist future investigations and interpretations of studies, optimize comparison between publications, minimize use of animals, and limit the investment in cost and time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":123280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary surgery : VS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"385-396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary surgery : VS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13772\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary surgery : VS","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

动力学步态分析和地面反作用力(GRFs)已在数百篇科学论文中使用。具体的方法、结果的解释和临床兽医的翻译一直不一致。这阻碍了兽医的进步,并对患者构成了风险。本报告的目的是解决方法上的差异,并就狗的GRFs的数据收集、分析、报告和解释的可行替代方法分享我们的共识。具有动态步态分析经验的研究者回顾了文献,并讨论了最影响GRF数据收集、报告和解释的主题。报告了方法上的差异,并得出了小组的共识。有几个合理的选择来收集、报告和解释狗的grf。在收集和报告这些数据时,需要注意几个方面的细节。该综述和共识报告应有助于未来的调查和研究解释,优化出版物之间的比较,最大限度地减少动物的使用,并限制成本和时间的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Best practices for measuring and reporting ground reaction forces in dogs.

Kinetic gait analysis and ground reaction forces (GRFs) have been used in hundreds of scientific manuscripts. Specific methodology, interpretation of results, and translation to clinical veterinary medicine have been inconsistent. This impedes the advance of veterinary medicine and poses a risk to patients. The objective of this report was to address methodological variations and share our consensus on a recommended approach with viable alternatives to data collection methods, analysis, reporting, and interpretation for GRFs in the dog. Investigators with experience performing kinetic gait analysis reviewed the literature and discussed the topics that most influenced GRF data collection, reporting, and interpretation. Methodological variations were reported and a consensus from the group was devised. There are several reasonable alternatives to collect, report, and interpret GRFs in dogs appropriately. Attention to detail is required in several areas to collect and report them. This review and consensus report should assist future investigations and interpretations of studies, optimize comparison between publications, minimize use of animals, and limit the investment in cost and time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信