你为什么要回医院?72小时再入院的定性分析。

Q2 Medicine
Hospital practice (1995) Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21548331.2021.2022383
Anna Luise Calderon, Geoffrey Lamb
{"title":"你为什么要回医院?72小时再入院的定性分析。","authors":"Anna Luise Calderon,&nbsp;Geoffrey Lamb","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2021.2022383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Readmissions occurring within a few days of discharge are more likely due to a problem from the patient's original admission and may be preventable by interventions in the hospital setting. As part of a quality improvement project intended to reduce readmissions within 72 hours of discharge our objective was to explore patient and physician perspectives of reasons for readmissions and to identify potential indicators of readmission during the index admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of all readmissions within 72 hours between 2/1/2019 and 6/7/2019 in our healthcare system comprised of an academic medical center and 2 smaller community hospitals. As part of a hospital protocol, patients readmitted within 30 days were interviewed by a social worker regarding reasons for readmission and their perspective on what might have prevented it. These answers, physician notes relevant to the reason for readmission and the clinical course of the index admission were abstracted from patient charts. For the subset of patients identified by themselves or their physicians as potentially benefitting from a longer hospitalization, their index admission was reviewed for indicators of readmission. Reasons for readmission, potential preventive measures, and indicators of readmission were independently reviewed by two authors then grouped into common themes by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty-one patients readmitted within 72 hours were identified. Most patients were readmitted for infection related, cardiac or pulmonary reasons. Extending the initial admission was the most common factor suggested by both patients and physicians to prevent readmission. Focusing on 70 patients who may have benefited from a longer admission, indicators included patients not returning to their baseline health status, inadequate management of a known issue, or new symptoms developing during the index admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients should be evaluated for indicators of readmission, which may help guide decisions to discharge patients and decrease rates of 72-hour readmissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":35045,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (1995)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why did you come back to the hospital? A qualitative analysis of 72-hour readmissions.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Luise Calderon,&nbsp;Geoffrey Lamb\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21548331.2021.2022383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Readmissions occurring within a few days of discharge are more likely due to a problem from the patient's original admission and may be preventable by interventions in the hospital setting. As part of a quality improvement project intended to reduce readmissions within 72 hours of discharge our objective was to explore patient and physician perspectives of reasons for readmissions and to identify potential indicators of readmission during the index admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of all readmissions within 72 hours between 2/1/2019 and 6/7/2019 in our healthcare system comprised of an academic medical center and 2 smaller community hospitals. As part of a hospital protocol, patients readmitted within 30 days were interviewed by a social worker regarding reasons for readmission and their perspective on what might have prevented it. These answers, physician notes relevant to the reason for readmission and the clinical course of the index admission were abstracted from patient charts. For the subset of patients identified by themselves or their physicians as potentially benefitting from a longer hospitalization, their index admission was reviewed for indicators of readmission. Reasons for readmission, potential preventive measures, and indicators of readmission were independently reviewed by two authors then grouped into common themes by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty-one patients readmitted within 72 hours were identified. Most patients were readmitted for infection related, cardiac or pulmonary reasons. Extending the initial admission was the most common factor suggested by both patients and physicians to prevent readmission. Focusing on 70 patients who may have benefited from a longer admission, indicators included patients not returning to their baseline health status, inadequate management of a known issue, or new symptoms developing during the index admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients should be evaluated for indicators of readmission, which may help guide decisions to discharge patients and decrease rates of 72-hour readmissions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital practice (1995)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital practice (1995)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2021.2022383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2021.2022383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:出院后几天内发生的再入院更有可能是由于患者最初入院时的问题,并且可以通过医院环境中的干预措施来预防。作为旨在减少出院72小时内再入院的质量改进项目的一部分,我们的目标是探索患者和医生对再入院原因的看法,并确定在索引入院期间再入院的潜在指标。方法:回顾性分析2019年2月1日至2019年6月7日由一个学术医疗中心和2个小型社区医院组成的医疗保健系统72小时内的所有再入院病例。作为医院规程的一部分,一名社会工作者对30天内再次入院的病人进行了面谈,询问他们再次入院的原因以及他们对可能阻止再次入院的原因的看法。这些答案,与再入院原因相关的医生笔记和索引入院的临床过程从患者图表中摘录。对于他们自己或他们的医生认为可能受益于较长住院时间的患者子集,他们的指数入院被审查为再入院的指标。再入院的原因,潜在的预防措施和再入院的指标由两位作者独立审查,然后通过共识分组为共同主题。结果:131例患者在72小时内再次入院。大多数患者因感染、心脏或肺部原因再次入院。延长初次住院时间是患者和医生建议的防止再入院的最常见因素。重点关注70例可能受益于较长住院时间的患者,指标包括患者未恢复到基线健康状态,对已知问题的管理不足,或在指数住院期间出现新症状。结论:对患者的再入院指标进行评估,有助于指导患者的出院决策,降低72小时再入院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why did you come back to the hospital? A qualitative analysis of 72-hour readmissions.

Objectives: Readmissions occurring within a few days of discharge are more likely due to a problem from the patient's original admission and may be preventable by interventions in the hospital setting. As part of a quality improvement project intended to reduce readmissions within 72 hours of discharge our objective was to explore patient and physician perspectives of reasons for readmissions and to identify potential indicators of readmission during the index admission.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of all readmissions within 72 hours between 2/1/2019 and 6/7/2019 in our healthcare system comprised of an academic medical center and 2 smaller community hospitals. As part of a hospital protocol, patients readmitted within 30 days were interviewed by a social worker regarding reasons for readmission and their perspective on what might have prevented it. These answers, physician notes relevant to the reason for readmission and the clinical course of the index admission were abstracted from patient charts. For the subset of patients identified by themselves or their physicians as potentially benefitting from a longer hospitalization, their index admission was reviewed for indicators of readmission. Reasons for readmission, potential preventive measures, and indicators of readmission were independently reviewed by two authors then grouped into common themes by consensus.

Results: One hundred and thirty-one patients readmitted within 72 hours were identified. Most patients were readmitted for infection related, cardiac or pulmonary reasons. Extending the initial admission was the most common factor suggested by both patients and physicians to prevent readmission. Focusing on 70 patients who may have benefited from a longer admission, indicators included patients not returning to their baseline health status, inadequate management of a known issue, or new symptoms developing during the index admission.

Conclusions: Patients should be evaluated for indicators of readmission, which may help guide decisions to discharge patients and decrease rates of 72-hour readmissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital practice (1995)
Hospital practice (1995) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信