Joachim Dissemond, Anke Bültemann, Veronika Gerber, Martin Motzkus, Karl Christian Münter, Cornelia Erfurt-Berge
{"title":"[《温德倡议纪事》(ICW)的立场文件e. 五。慢性伤口清创术的命名[j]。","authors":"Joachim Dissemond, Anke Bültemann, Veronika Gerber, Martin Motzkus, Karl Christian Münter, Cornelia Erfurt-Berge","doi":"10.1007/s00105-022-04944-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The nomenclature used today in wound treatment varies widely across different disciplines and professions. Therefore, it is a mission of the professional association Initiative Chronische Wunde (ICW) e. V. to exactly and comprehensibly describe terms that were previously unclear. Therefore, the experts of the ICW defined in a consensus procedure debridement of chronic wounds as the removal of adherent, dead tissue, scabs or foreign bodies from wounds. There are various therapy options for this, which can be differentiated into autolytic, biosurgical, mechanical, osmotic, proteolytic/enzymatic and technical debridement. In the case of surgical debridement, a distinction is also made between sharp debridements that can usually be performed on an outpatient basis, such as minor surgical procedures, and surgical debridements with adequate anaesthesia in an operating theatre. Wound irrigation is defined by the ICW as the removal of non-adherent components on wounds with sterile solutions. Debridement and/or wound irrigation are often the first step in phase-appropriate modern wound treatment. Several methods are suitable for use in a combined or successive therapy. When deciding which therapeutic option to use, a number of individually different factors should be taken into account, depending on the patients to be treated but also on the therapists. The final individual decision for a method should be made together with the patient in each case and then adequately documented.</p>","PeriodicalId":12970,"journal":{"name":"Hautarzt","volume":"73 5","pages":"369-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9085679/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Position paper of the Initiative Chronische Wunde (ICW) e. V. on the nomenclature of debridement in chronic wounds].\",\"authors\":\"Joachim Dissemond, Anke Bültemann, Veronika Gerber, Martin Motzkus, Karl Christian Münter, Cornelia Erfurt-Berge\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00105-022-04944-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The nomenclature used today in wound treatment varies widely across different disciplines and professions. Therefore, it is a mission of the professional association Initiative Chronische Wunde (ICW) e. V. to exactly and comprehensibly describe terms that were previously unclear. Therefore, the experts of the ICW defined in a consensus procedure debridement of chronic wounds as the removal of adherent, dead tissue, scabs or foreign bodies from wounds. There are various therapy options for this, which can be differentiated into autolytic, biosurgical, mechanical, osmotic, proteolytic/enzymatic and technical debridement. In the case of surgical debridement, a distinction is also made between sharp debridements that can usually be performed on an outpatient basis, such as minor surgical procedures, and surgical debridements with adequate anaesthesia in an operating theatre. Wound irrigation is defined by the ICW as the removal of non-adherent components on wounds with sterile solutions. Debridement and/or wound irrigation are often the first step in phase-appropriate modern wound treatment. Several methods are suitable for use in a combined or successive therapy. When deciding which therapeutic option to use, a number of individually different factors should be taken into account, depending on the patients to be treated but also on the therapists. The final individual decision for a method should be made together with the patient in each case and then adequately documented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hautarzt\",\"volume\":\"73 5\",\"pages\":\"369-375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9085679/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hautarzt\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-022-04944-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hautarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-022-04944-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
今天在伤口治疗中使用的术语在不同的学科和专业中差别很大。因此,这是一个专业协会的使命,倡议文德(ICW) e. V。准确而全面地描述以前不清楚的术语。因此,ICW的专家们将慢性伤口的清创定义为去除伤口上的附着、死亡组织、结痂或异物。治疗方法有多种,可分为自溶、生物外科、机械、渗透、蛋白水解/酶解和技术清创。在外科清创的情况下,也要区分通常在门诊进行的尖锐清创,如小型外科手术,和在手术室进行充分麻醉的外科清创。伤口冲洗被ICW定义为用无菌溶液去除伤口上的非粘附成分。清创和/或伤口冲洗通常是适当的现代伤口治疗的第一步。有几种方法适合用于联合或连续治疗。在决定使用哪种治疗方案时,应考虑到一些单独不同的因素,这取决于要治疗的患者,也取决于治疗师。对于一种方法的最终个人决定应与每个病例的患者一起做出,然后充分记录。
[Position paper of the Initiative Chronische Wunde (ICW) e. V. on the nomenclature of debridement in chronic wounds].
The nomenclature used today in wound treatment varies widely across different disciplines and professions. Therefore, it is a mission of the professional association Initiative Chronische Wunde (ICW) e. V. to exactly and comprehensibly describe terms that were previously unclear. Therefore, the experts of the ICW defined in a consensus procedure debridement of chronic wounds as the removal of adherent, dead tissue, scabs or foreign bodies from wounds. There are various therapy options for this, which can be differentiated into autolytic, biosurgical, mechanical, osmotic, proteolytic/enzymatic and technical debridement. In the case of surgical debridement, a distinction is also made between sharp debridements that can usually be performed on an outpatient basis, such as minor surgical procedures, and surgical debridements with adequate anaesthesia in an operating theatre. Wound irrigation is defined by the ICW as the removal of non-adherent components on wounds with sterile solutions. Debridement and/or wound irrigation are often the first step in phase-appropriate modern wound treatment. Several methods are suitable for use in a combined or successive therapy. When deciding which therapeutic option to use, a number of individually different factors should be taken into account, depending on the patients to be treated but also on the therapists. The final individual decision for a method should be made together with the patient in each case and then adequately documented.
期刊介绍:
Der Hautarzt is an internationally recognized journal informing all dermatologists working in practical or clinical environments about important developments in the field of dermatology including allergology, venereology and related areas.
Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy.
Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange.
Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.