手术室环境中的气道管理:安全事件报告分析

Q3 Medicine
Kevin B. Osgood MD, Sindhu Krishnan MD, Kimberly K. Wheeler DNP, RN, CNOR, Marc P. Pimentel MD, MPH, CPPS, Joshua C. Vacanti MD, Richard D. Urman MD, MBA
{"title":"手术室环境中的气道管理:安全事件报告分析","authors":"Kevin B. Osgood MD,&nbsp;Sindhu Krishnan MD,&nbsp;Kimberly K. Wheeler DNP, RN, CNOR,&nbsp;Marc P. Pimentel MD, MPH, CPPS,&nbsp;Joshua C. Vacanti MD,&nbsp;Richard D. Urman MD, MBA","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.21493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Adverse event reporting systems are important tools for identifying areas of risk and opportunities quality improvement. Perioperative airway management (PAM) carries patient risk. We examine the nature of PAM incident reports at an academic tertiary care center. In this retrospective data review, perioperative safety reports filed under “Airway Management” between 2015 and 2020 were analyzed. Data analyzed included severity level (patient harm) and specific event type. There was a total of 7827 safety reports filed from January 2015 to July 2020, with 67 reports related to “Airway Management” (0.85%). The most common specific event type in this safety reporting database was “Intubation Injury (Mouth, Tooth, Airway)” (35.8%). The most common severity level of all reported events was level 2 (temporary or minor harm, 57%). Our safety reporting data demonstrates that adverse events related to PAM are likely to reach the patient and can cause significant harm. Data from our findings can help providers and risk managers to focus efforts on reducing patient harm. Strategies include continued education in technical skills and crisis management, preparation for the difficult airway, increased availability of video laryngoscopes, ongoing safety reporting and collaborative review of adverse events with implementation of quality improvement measures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management","volume":"41 4","pages":"36-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Airway management in the operating room setting: An analysis of reported safety events\",\"authors\":\"Kevin B. Osgood MD,&nbsp;Sindhu Krishnan MD,&nbsp;Kimberly K. Wheeler DNP, RN, CNOR,&nbsp;Marc P. Pimentel MD, MPH, CPPS,&nbsp;Joshua C. Vacanti MD,&nbsp;Richard D. Urman MD, MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhrm.21493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Adverse event reporting systems are important tools for identifying areas of risk and opportunities quality improvement. Perioperative airway management (PAM) carries patient risk. We examine the nature of PAM incident reports at an academic tertiary care center. In this retrospective data review, perioperative safety reports filed under “Airway Management” between 2015 and 2020 were analyzed. Data analyzed included severity level (patient harm) and specific event type. There was a total of 7827 safety reports filed from January 2015 to July 2020, with 67 reports related to “Airway Management” (0.85%). The most common specific event type in this safety reporting database was “Intubation Injury (Mouth, Tooth, Airway)” (35.8%). The most common severity level of all reported events was level 2 (temporary or minor harm, 57%). Our safety reporting data demonstrates that adverse events related to PAM are likely to reach the patient and can cause significant harm. Data from our findings can help providers and risk managers to focus efforts on reducing patient harm. Strategies include continued education in technical skills and crisis management, preparation for the difficult airway, increased availability of video laryngoscopes, ongoing safety reporting and collaborative review of adverse events with implementation of quality improvement measures.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"36-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhrm.21493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhrm.21493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不良事件报告系统是识别风险领域和质量改进机会的重要工具。围手术期气道管理(PAM)存在患者风险。我们检查在学术三级护理中心PAM事件报告的性质。在本回顾性数据回顾中,分析了2015年至2020年在“气道管理”下提交的围手术期安全报告。分析的数据包括严重程度(患者伤害)和具体事件类型。2015年1月至2020年7月共收到7827份安全报告,其中涉及“气道管理”的报告67份(0.85%)。该安全报告数据库中最常见的特定事件类型是“插管损伤(口腔、牙齿、气道)”(35.8%)。所有报告事件中最常见的严重级别为2级(暂时或轻微伤害,57%)。我们的安全报告数据表明,与PAM相关的不良事件可能会影响到患者,并可能造成重大伤害。我们发现的数据可以帮助提供者和风险管理者集中精力减少对患者的伤害。战略包括继续进行技术技能和危机管理方面的教育,为困难气道做好准备,增加视频喉镜的可用性,持续的安全报告和对不良事件的合作审查,并实施质量改进措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Airway management in the operating room setting: An analysis of reported safety events

Adverse event reporting systems are important tools for identifying areas of risk and opportunities quality improvement. Perioperative airway management (PAM) carries patient risk. We examine the nature of PAM incident reports at an academic tertiary care center. In this retrospective data review, perioperative safety reports filed under “Airway Management” between 2015 and 2020 were analyzed. Data analyzed included severity level (patient harm) and specific event type. There was a total of 7827 safety reports filed from January 2015 to July 2020, with 67 reports related to “Airway Management” (0.85%). The most common specific event type in this safety reporting database was “Intubation Injury (Mouth, Tooth, Airway)” (35.8%). The most common severity level of all reported events was level 2 (temporary or minor harm, 57%). Our safety reporting data demonstrates that adverse events related to PAM are likely to reach the patient and can cause significant harm. Data from our findings can help providers and risk managers to focus efforts on reducing patient harm. Strategies include continued education in technical skills and crisis management, preparation for the difficult airway, increased availability of video laryngoscopes, ongoing safety reporting and collaborative review of adverse events with implementation of quality improvement measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Risk Management is published quarterly by the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management (ASHRM). The purpose of the journal is to publish research, trends, and new developments in the field of healthcare risk management with the ultimate goal of advancing safe and trusted patient-centered healthcare delivery and promoting proactive and innovative management of organization-wide risk. The journal focuses on insightful, peer-reviewed content that relates to patient safety, emergency preparedness, insurance, legal, leadership, and other timely healthcare risk management issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信