腭裂婴儿喂养干预措施的系统综述。

Cameron Penny, Connor McGuire, Michael Bezuhly
{"title":"腭裂婴儿喂养干预措施的系统综述。","authors":"Cameron Penny,&nbsp;Connor McGuire,&nbsp;Michael Bezuhly","doi":"10.1177/10556656211051216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Various devices and techniques have been proposed to reduce feeding difficulties experienced by infants with cleft palate. The aim of this review is to identify and assess the scope and quality of evidence for these interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of published literature evaluating feeding interventions for infants with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) from database inception to 2021 was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines. Quality appraisal of included studies was conducted using a methodological index for nonrandomized studies, Cochrane, or a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 instruments, according to study type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria, with the majority (71%) of studies consisting of second-level evidence. Included interventions were specialty bottles (21%), alternative feeding delivery systems (14%), obturators (14%), and educational programs (14%). Specialty bottles and palatal obturators did not appear to offer any substantial growth advantages compared to traditional bottles or no intervention, respectively. Designated education programs for the mothers of infants with clefts had a positive impact on infant growth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall evidence evaluating feeding interventions for infants with cleft palate was moderate to low. While it does not appear that specialized feeding delivery systems or palatal obturators significantly improve growth in infants with clefts compared to children without cleft conditions, education programs do appear to be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":520794,"journal":{"name":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","volume":" ","pages":"1527-1536"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Feeding Interventions for Infants with Cleft Palate.\",\"authors\":\"Cameron Penny,&nbsp;Connor McGuire,&nbsp;Michael Bezuhly\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656211051216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Various devices and techniques have been proposed to reduce feeding difficulties experienced by infants with cleft palate. The aim of this review is to identify and assess the scope and quality of evidence for these interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of published literature evaluating feeding interventions for infants with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) from database inception to 2021 was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines. Quality appraisal of included studies was conducted using a methodological index for nonrandomized studies, Cochrane, or a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 instruments, according to study type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria, with the majority (71%) of studies consisting of second-level evidence. Included interventions were specialty bottles (21%), alternative feeding delivery systems (14%), obturators (14%), and educational programs (14%). Specialty bottles and palatal obturators did not appear to offer any substantial growth advantages compared to traditional bottles or no intervention, respectively. Designated education programs for the mothers of infants with clefts had a positive impact on infant growth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall evidence evaluating feeding interventions for infants with cleft palate was moderate to low. While it does not appear that specialized feeding delivery systems or palatal obturators significantly improve growth in infants with clefts compared to children without cleft conditions, education programs do appear to be beneficial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1527-1536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211051216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211051216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:提出了各种设备和技术来减少腭裂婴儿的喂养困难。本综述的目的是确定和评估这些干预措施的证据范围和质量。方法:根据系统评价指南的首选报告项目,对数据库建立至2021年期间评估腭裂婴儿(伴或不伴唇裂)喂养干预措施的已发表文献进行系统评价。根据研究类型,采用非随机研究的方法学指数(Cochrane)或评估系统评价的测量工具(2种工具)对纳入研究进行质量评价。结果:14项研究符合纳入标准,大多数(71%)的研究包含二级证据。干预措施包括专用奶瓶(21%)、替代喂食系统(14%)、闭孔器(14%)和教育计划(14%)。与传统的瓶子相比,特殊的瓶子和腭闭孔器似乎没有提供任何实质性的增长优势,或者没有干预。为唇腭裂婴儿母亲设立的专项教育项目对婴儿的成长产生了积极的影响。结论:评价腭裂婴儿喂养干预的总体证据是中等到低的。虽然与没有唇裂的儿童相比,专门的喂养系统或腭闭孔器似乎并没有显著改善唇裂婴儿的生长,但教育计划似乎是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review of Feeding Interventions for Infants with Cleft Palate.

Objective: Various devices and techniques have been proposed to reduce feeding difficulties experienced by infants with cleft palate. The aim of this review is to identify and assess the scope and quality of evidence for these interventions.

Methods: A systematic review of published literature evaluating feeding interventions for infants with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) from database inception to 2021 was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines. Quality appraisal of included studies was conducted using a methodological index for nonrandomized studies, Cochrane, or a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 instruments, according to study type.

Results: Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria, with the majority (71%) of studies consisting of second-level evidence. Included interventions were specialty bottles (21%), alternative feeding delivery systems (14%), obturators (14%), and educational programs (14%). Specialty bottles and palatal obturators did not appear to offer any substantial growth advantages compared to traditional bottles or no intervention, respectively. Designated education programs for the mothers of infants with clefts had a positive impact on infant growth.

Conclusions: Overall evidence evaluating feeding interventions for infants with cleft palate was moderate to low. While it does not appear that specialized feeding delivery systems or palatal obturators significantly improve growth in infants with clefts compared to children without cleft conditions, education programs do appear to be beneficial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信