阿奇霉素比β-内酰胺单独治疗严重社区获得性肺炎相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的额外效果:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 6.2 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jun Suzuki, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Shuji Hatakeyama, Hiroki Matsui, Teppei Sasahara, Yuji Morisawa, Toshiyuki Yamada, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"阿奇霉素比β-内酰胺单独治疗严重社区获得性肺炎相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的额外效果:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Jun Suzuki,&nbsp;Yusuke Sasabuchi,&nbsp;Shuji Hatakeyama,&nbsp;Hiroki Matsui,&nbsp;Teppei Sasahara,&nbsp;Yuji Morisawa,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Yamada,&nbsp;Kiyohide Fushimi,&nbsp;Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1186/s41479-021-00093-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the most common cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although previous studies have suggested that macrolide therapy is beneficial for ARDS, its benefit for severe CAP-associated ARDS remains uncertain. Previous studies were limited in that they had a small sample size and included patients with non-pulmonary ARDS and those with pulmonary ARDS. This study aimed to investigate the additional effect of azithromycin when used with β-lactam compared with the effect of β-lactam alone in mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS between July 2010 and March 2015 using data in the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a Japanese nationwide inpatient database. We performed propensity score matching analysis to assess 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS who received β-lactam with and without azithromycin within hospital 2 days after admission. The inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eligible patients (n = 1257) were divided into the azithromycin group (n = 226) and the control group (n = 1031). The one-to-four propensity score matching analysis included 139 azithromycin users and 556 non-users. No significant difference was observed between the groups with respect to 28-day mortality (34.5% vs. 37.6%, p = 0.556) or in-hospital mortality (46.0% vs. 49.1%, p = 0.569). The inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis showed similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with treatment with β-lactam alone, treatment with azithromycin plus β-lactam had no significant additional effect on 28-day mortality or in-hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to determine the effect of azithromycin in mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":45120,"journal":{"name":"Pneumonia","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8744237/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Additional effect of azithromycin over β-lactam alone for severe community-acquired pneumonia-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Suzuki,&nbsp;Yusuke Sasabuchi,&nbsp;Shuji Hatakeyama,&nbsp;Hiroki Matsui,&nbsp;Teppei Sasahara,&nbsp;Yuji Morisawa,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Yamada,&nbsp;Kiyohide Fushimi,&nbsp;Hideo Yasunaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41479-021-00093-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the most common cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although previous studies have suggested that macrolide therapy is beneficial for ARDS, its benefit for severe CAP-associated ARDS remains uncertain. Previous studies were limited in that they had a small sample size and included patients with non-pulmonary ARDS and those with pulmonary ARDS. This study aimed to investigate the additional effect of azithromycin when used with β-lactam compared with the effect of β-lactam alone in mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS between July 2010 and March 2015 using data in the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a Japanese nationwide inpatient database. We performed propensity score matching analysis to assess 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS who received β-lactam with and without azithromycin within hospital 2 days after admission. The inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eligible patients (n = 1257) were divided into the azithromycin group (n = 226) and the control group (n = 1031). The one-to-four propensity score matching analysis included 139 azithromycin users and 556 non-users. No significant difference was observed between the groups with respect to 28-day mortality (34.5% vs. 37.6%, p = 0.556) or in-hospital mortality (46.0% vs. 49.1%, p = 0.569). The inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis showed similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with treatment with β-lactam alone, treatment with azithromycin plus β-lactam had no significant additional effect on 28-day mortality or in-hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to determine the effect of azithromycin in mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pneumonia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8744237/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pneumonia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41479-021-00093-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumonia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41479-021-00093-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)最常见的病因。尽管先前的研究表明大环内酯类药物治疗对ARDS有益,但其对严重cap相关ARDS的益处仍不确定。既往研究的局限性在于样本量小,包括非肺性ARDS患者和肺性ARDS患者。本研究旨在探讨阿奇霉素与β-内酰胺联合使用与单独使用β-内酰胺对机械通气cap相关ARDS患者的额外作用。方法:我们使用诊断程序组合数据库(日本全国住院患者数据库)中的数据,确定2010年7月至2015年3月期间机械通气的cap相关ARDS患者。我们进行倾向评分匹配分析,以评估住院后2天内接受β-内酰胺加阿奇霉素和不加阿奇霉素的机械通气cap相关ARDS患者的28天死亡率和住院死亡率。并进行了处理权逆概率分析。结果:符合条件的患者1257例,分为阿奇霉素组226例和对照组1031例。一对四的倾向评分匹配分析包括139名阿奇霉素使用者和556名非阿奇霉素使用者。两组28天死亡率(34.5%对37.6%,p = 0.556)和住院死亡率(46.0%对49.1%,p = 0.569)无显著差异。处理加权逆概率分析也显示了类似的结果。结论:与单用β-内酰胺治疗相比,阿奇霉素联合β-内酰胺治疗对机械通气cap相关ARDS患者28天死亡率和住院死亡率无显著影响。据我们所知,这项研究首次确定了阿奇霉素对机械通气的cap相关ARDS患者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Additional effect of azithromycin over β-lactam alone for severe community-acquired pneumonia-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.

Additional effect of azithromycin over β-lactam alone for severe community-acquired pneumonia-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the most common cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although previous studies have suggested that macrolide therapy is beneficial for ARDS, its benefit for severe CAP-associated ARDS remains uncertain. Previous studies were limited in that they had a small sample size and included patients with non-pulmonary ARDS and those with pulmonary ARDS. This study aimed to investigate the additional effect of azithromycin when used with β-lactam compared with the effect of β-lactam alone in mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS.

Methods: We identified mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS between July 2010 and March 2015 using data in the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a Japanese nationwide inpatient database. We performed propensity score matching analysis to assess 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS who received β-lactam with and without azithromycin within hospital 2 days after admission. The inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was also conducted.

Results: Eligible patients (n = 1257) were divided into the azithromycin group (n = 226) and the control group (n = 1031). The one-to-four propensity score matching analysis included 139 azithromycin users and 556 non-users. No significant difference was observed between the groups with respect to 28-day mortality (34.5% vs. 37.6%, p = 0.556) or in-hospital mortality (46.0% vs. 49.1%, p = 0.569). The inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis showed similar results.

Conclusions: Compared with treatment with β-lactam alone, treatment with azithromycin plus β-lactam had no significant additional effect on 28-day mortality or in-hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to determine the effect of azithromycin in mechanically ventilated patients with CAP-associated ARDS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pneumonia
Pneumonia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
1.50%
发文量
7
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信