Hauke Lang, Peter Philipp Grimminger, Hans-Joachim Meyer
{"title":"[从专家协会(DGCH)的角度看外科最小病例量规定:科学、政治、治疗现实和一系列其他方面之间的平衡行为]。","authors":"Hauke Lang, Peter Philipp Grimminger, Hans-Joachim Meyer","doi":"10.1007/s00104-022-01596-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The scientifically founded surgical specialist discussion regarding the legal requirements for minimum volume numbers for diverse organ systems and selected surgical procedures as the basis of quality assurance and optimization of treatment is not new. Comprehensive and also reliable data from national and international studies are available for colorectal surgery, pancreatic surgery, esophageal surgery, liver surgery and gastric surgery. Recently, the raising of the minimum volume for complex esophageal interventions by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) in Germany from 10 up to 26 procedures per hospital and year, reignited the debate on this topic as well as the debate on centralization in the healthcare system in general. This decision seems to be scientifically well-justified from the perspective of political bodies and realizable in the practical implementation; however, from the perspective of physicians routinely involved in the corresponding highly complex procedures, there is a very much broader basis for discussion, which is only partially covered by a report of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in the Healthcare System (IQWiG) as the foundation of the decision of the G‑BA. For the scientifically oriented surgical specialist society, in the first instance priority is given to the scientific evidence as the guiding principle. Nevertheless, aspects of the treatment reality cannot and should not be ignored. Therefore, the recommendations of the specialist society must be oriented not only to the quality of results but also to the realistic options for successful implementation in practice. Furthermore, questions of further education, the right of the patient to freedom of choice of the physician and preservation of the attractiveness of the occupational profile of surgeons are immanent topics for the surgical specialist society.</p>","PeriodicalId":50700,"journal":{"name":"Chirurg","volume":"93 4","pages":"342-348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864976/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Minimum case volume regulations in surgery from the perspective of the specialist society (DGCH) : Balancing act between science, politics, treatment reality and a range of other aspects].\",\"authors\":\"Hauke Lang, Peter Philipp Grimminger, Hans-Joachim Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00104-022-01596-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The scientifically founded surgical specialist discussion regarding the legal requirements for minimum volume numbers for diverse organ systems and selected surgical procedures as the basis of quality assurance and optimization of treatment is not new. Comprehensive and also reliable data from national and international studies are available for colorectal surgery, pancreatic surgery, esophageal surgery, liver surgery and gastric surgery. Recently, the raising of the minimum volume for complex esophageal interventions by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) in Germany from 10 up to 26 procedures per hospital and year, reignited the debate on this topic as well as the debate on centralization in the healthcare system in general. This decision seems to be scientifically well-justified from the perspective of political bodies and realizable in the practical implementation; however, from the perspective of physicians routinely involved in the corresponding highly complex procedures, there is a very much broader basis for discussion, which is only partially covered by a report of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in the Healthcare System (IQWiG) as the foundation of the decision of the G‑BA. For the scientifically oriented surgical specialist society, in the first instance priority is given to the scientific evidence as the guiding principle. Nevertheless, aspects of the treatment reality cannot and should not be ignored. Therefore, the recommendations of the specialist society must be oriented not only to the quality of results but also to the realistic options for successful implementation in practice. Furthermore, questions of further education, the right of the patient to freedom of choice of the physician and preservation of the attractiveness of the occupational profile of surgeons are immanent topics for the surgical specialist society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurg\",\"volume\":\"93 4\",\"pages\":\"342-348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8864976/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurg\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-022-01596-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurg","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-022-01596-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Minimum case volume regulations in surgery from the perspective of the specialist society (DGCH) : Balancing act between science, politics, treatment reality and a range of other aspects].
The scientifically founded surgical specialist discussion regarding the legal requirements for minimum volume numbers for diverse organ systems and selected surgical procedures as the basis of quality assurance and optimization of treatment is not new. Comprehensive and also reliable data from national and international studies are available for colorectal surgery, pancreatic surgery, esophageal surgery, liver surgery and gastric surgery. Recently, the raising of the minimum volume for complex esophageal interventions by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) in Germany from 10 up to 26 procedures per hospital and year, reignited the debate on this topic as well as the debate on centralization in the healthcare system in general. This decision seems to be scientifically well-justified from the perspective of political bodies and realizable in the practical implementation; however, from the perspective of physicians routinely involved in the corresponding highly complex procedures, there is a very much broader basis for discussion, which is only partially covered by a report of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in the Healthcare System (IQWiG) as the foundation of the decision of the G‑BA. For the scientifically oriented surgical specialist society, in the first instance priority is given to the scientific evidence as the guiding principle. Nevertheless, aspects of the treatment reality cannot and should not be ignored. Therefore, the recommendations of the specialist society must be oriented not only to the quality of results but also to the realistic options for successful implementation in practice. Furthermore, questions of further education, the right of the patient to freedom of choice of the physician and preservation of the attractiveness of the occupational profile of surgeons are immanent topics for the surgical specialist society.
期刊介绍:
Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen
The magazine is intended for surgeons in hospitals, clinics and research.
Each issue includes a comprehensive theme: Practical summaries access to selected topics and provide the reader with a compilation of current knowledge in all fields of surgery. Besides imparting relevant background knowledge, the emphasis is on the review of scientific results and practical experience. The reader will find concrete recommendations.