埃塞俄比亚西北部贡德尔市棉纺工人的肺功能、呼吸道症状及相关因素:一项横断面比较研究。

International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology Pub Date : 2021-10-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01
Yonas Derso, Baye Dagnew, Yonas Akalu, Ayechew Adera Getu, Mihret Getnet, Yigizie Yeshaw
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚西北部贡德尔市棉纺工人的肺功能、呼吸道症状及相关因素:一项横断面比较研究。","authors":"Yonas Derso, Baye Dagnew, Yonas Akalu, Ayechew Adera Getu, Mihret Getnet, Yigizie Yeshaw","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cotton dust is one of the risk factors for occupational respiratory diseases, a condition characterized by reduced pulmonary function and overwhelming respiratory symptoms. Therefore, this study aimed to determine pulmonary function parameters, respiratory symptoms, and associated factors among cotton-ginning workers at Gondar city, northwest Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on 166 (83 cotton-ginning workers and 83 healthy controls) individuals. Simple random sampling and convenience sampling techniques were used to recruit cotton-ginning workers and controls, respectively. Pulmonary function parameters were measured using Spirometer. Data on respiratory symptoms were collected using the Modified American Thoracic Society questionnaire. We used Chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>) and independent \"t\" test to compare the outcome variables between the two groups. Binary logistic regression was used to identify the associated factors of respiratory symptoms among cotton-ginning workers. The strength of association was determined using an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) and statistical significance was decided at P<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cotton-ginning workers had reduced FVC, FVC%, FEV1, FEV1/FVC%, PEFR and FEF25-75%) as compared with controls. The prevalence of overall respiratory symptom was 68.6% (95% CI: 57.8, 77.8) among cotton-ginning workers and 19.2% (95% CI: 12, 29.3) among controls. Females (AOR=5.9, 95% CI: 1.19, 29.9), those with primary and secondary education (AOR=7.9, 95% CI: 1.2, 52), working at ginning department (AOR=9.4, 95% CI 1.6, 53) and pressing department (AOR=8.0, 95% CI: 1.3, 48) and not using personal protective equipment (PPE) (AOR=9.1, 95% CI: 1.8, 45.1) had an increased odds of having respiratory symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reduced pulmonary function parameters and a higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms were observed among cotton-ginning workers than controls. This suggests the need to tailor workplace safety measures to prevent occupational respiratory diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":14352,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","volume":"13 5","pages":"140-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611241/pdf/ijppp0013-0140.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonary function, respiratory symptoms and associated factors among cotton-ginning workers at Gondar city, Northwest Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Yonas Derso, Baye Dagnew, Yonas Akalu, Ayechew Adera Getu, Mihret Getnet, Yigizie Yeshaw\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cotton dust is one of the risk factors for occupational respiratory diseases, a condition characterized by reduced pulmonary function and overwhelming respiratory symptoms. Therefore, this study aimed to determine pulmonary function parameters, respiratory symptoms, and associated factors among cotton-ginning workers at Gondar city, northwest Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on 166 (83 cotton-ginning workers and 83 healthy controls) individuals. Simple random sampling and convenience sampling techniques were used to recruit cotton-ginning workers and controls, respectively. Pulmonary function parameters were measured using Spirometer. Data on respiratory symptoms were collected using the Modified American Thoracic Society questionnaire. We used Chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>) and independent \\\"t\\\" test to compare the outcome variables between the two groups. Binary logistic regression was used to identify the associated factors of respiratory symptoms among cotton-ginning workers. The strength of association was determined using an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) and statistical significance was decided at P<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cotton-ginning workers had reduced FVC, FVC%, FEV1, FEV1/FVC%, PEFR and FEF25-75%) as compared with controls. The prevalence of overall respiratory symptom was 68.6% (95% CI: 57.8, 77.8) among cotton-ginning workers and 19.2% (95% CI: 12, 29.3) among controls. Females (AOR=5.9, 95% CI: 1.19, 29.9), those with primary and secondary education (AOR=7.9, 95% CI: 1.2, 52), working at ginning department (AOR=9.4, 95% CI 1.6, 53) and pressing department (AOR=8.0, 95% CI: 1.3, 48) and not using personal protective equipment (PPE) (AOR=9.1, 95% CI: 1.8, 45.1) had an increased odds of having respiratory symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reduced pulmonary function parameters and a higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms were observed among cotton-ginning workers than controls. This suggests the need to tailor workplace safety measures to prevent occupational respiratory diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"140-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611241/pdf/ijppp0013-0140.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:棉尘是职业性呼吸道疾病的危险因素之一,这种疾病的特点是肺功能下降和呼吸道症状严重。因此,本研究旨在确定埃塞俄比亚西北部贡达尔市棉花轧制工人的肺功能参数、呼吸道症状及相关因素:方法:对 166 人(83 名棉花轧制工人和 83 名健康对照者)进行了横断面比较研究。分别采用简单随机抽样和方便抽样技术招募棉纺工人和对照组。使用肺活量计测量肺功能参数。呼吸系统症状数据采用美国胸科学会改良问卷进行收集。我们使用卡方检验(χ2)和独立 "t "检验来比较两组间的结果变量。我们使用二元逻辑回归来确定棉纺工人呼吸道症状的相关因素。使用调整后的几率比(AOR)及其 95% 的置信区间(CI)来确定相关性的强度,统计显著性以结果为准:与对照组相比,棉纺工人的 FVC、FVC%、FEV1、FEV1/FVC%、PEFR 和 FEF25-75% 均有所下降。棉纺工人的总体呼吸道症状发生率为 68.6%(95% CI:57.8-77.8),对照组为 19.2%(95% CI:12-29.3)。女性(AOR=5.9,95% CI:1.19,29.9)、受过中小学教育(AOR=7.9,95% CI:1.2,52)、在轧棉部门(AOR=9.4,95% CI:1.6,53)和压榨部门(AOR=8.0,95% CI:1.3,48)工作以及未使用个人防护设备(PPE)(AOR=9.1,95% CI:1.8,45.1)的人出现呼吸道症状的几率更高:结论:与对照组相比,棉纺工人的肺功能参数降低,呼吸道症状发生率更高。结论:与对照组相比,棉纺工人的肺功能参数降低,呼吸道症状的发生率更高,这表明有必要采取有针对性的工作场所安全措施来预防职业性呼吸道疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulmonary function, respiratory symptoms and associated factors among cotton-ginning workers at Gondar city, Northwest Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study.

Background: Cotton dust is one of the risk factors for occupational respiratory diseases, a condition characterized by reduced pulmonary function and overwhelming respiratory symptoms. Therefore, this study aimed to determine pulmonary function parameters, respiratory symptoms, and associated factors among cotton-ginning workers at Gondar city, northwest Ethiopia.

Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on 166 (83 cotton-ginning workers and 83 healthy controls) individuals. Simple random sampling and convenience sampling techniques were used to recruit cotton-ginning workers and controls, respectively. Pulmonary function parameters were measured using Spirometer. Data on respiratory symptoms were collected using the Modified American Thoracic Society questionnaire. We used Chi-square (χ2) and independent "t" test to compare the outcome variables between the two groups. Binary logistic regression was used to identify the associated factors of respiratory symptoms among cotton-ginning workers. The strength of association was determined using an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) and statistical significance was decided at P<0.05.

Results: Cotton-ginning workers had reduced FVC, FVC%, FEV1, FEV1/FVC%, PEFR and FEF25-75%) as compared with controls. The prevalence of overall respiratory symptom was 68.6% (95% CI: 57.8, 77.8) among cotton-ginning workers and 19.2% (95% CI: 12, 29.3) among controls. Females (AOR=5.9, 95% CI: 1.19, 29.9), those with primary and secondary education (AOR=7.9, 95% CI: 1.2, 52), working at ginning department (AOR=9.4, 95% CI 1.6, 53) and pressing department (AOR=8.0, 95% CI: 1.3, 48) and not using personal protective equipment (PPE) (AOR=9.1, 95% CI: 1.8, 45.1) had an increased odds of having respiratory symptoms.

Conclusion: Reduced pulmonary function parameters and a higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms were observed among cotton-ginning workers than controls. This suggests the need to tailor workplace safety measures to prevent occupational respiratory diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信