Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Kimberly T Arnold, Enola K Proctor
{"title":"在非专业精神卫生机构实施循证实践。","authors":"Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Kimberly T Arnold, Enola K Proctor","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mental health services are often implemented in settings in which mental health is not the primary mission. Schools, primary care clinics, criminal justice and child welfare institutions, and senior centers have been increasingly adding mental health care to their compendium of services owing to the high rates of mental health needs in these settings. Despite numerous challenges to implementing mental health practices in settings where mental health care has not traditionally been a part of the service model, the demand for mental health services in these settings is growing. Implementation science offers a lens through which to understand unique challenges and potential solutions to implementing mental health services in these settings, with the ultimate goal of ensuring the implementation of evidence-based services.</p><p><strong>Method and results: </strong>In this conceptual article, we discuss common overarching barriers to implementing evidence-based mental health interventions in nonspecialty mental health settings, such as workforce challenges, competing priorities, and financial considerations. Then, using examples from schools and primary care, we elucidate unique contextual considerations and implementation challenges in these settings. Finally, we articulate a research agenda for advancing implementation of evidence-based practices in nonspecialty mental health including highlighting promising implementation strategies (e.g., task shifting, adaptation) and the most relevant implementation outcomes to assess in these contexts (e.g., appropriateness, feasibility).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given that nonspecialty mental health settings deliver a large proportion of mental health care to traditionally underserved populations, there are important public health implications to advancing research in this area and ensuring implemented services are evidence-based. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":358476,"journal":{"name":"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"274-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing evidence-based practices in nonspecialty mental health settings.\",\"authors\":\"Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Kimberly T Arnold, Enola K Proctor\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fsh0000506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mental health services are often implemented in settings in which mental health is not the primary mission. Schools, primary care clinics, criminal justice and child welfare institutions, and senior centers have been increasingly adding mental health care to their compendium of services owing to the high rates of mental health needs in these settings. Despite numerous challenges to implementing mental health practices in settings where mental health care has not traditionally been a part of the service model, the demand for mental health services in these settings is growing. Implementation science offers a lens through which to understand unique challenges and potential solutions to implementing mental health services in these settings, with the ultimate goal of ensuring the implementation of evidence-based services.</p><p><strong>Method and results: </strong>In this conceptual article, we discuss common overarching barriers to implementing evidence-based mental health interventions in nonspecialty mental health settings, such as workforce challenges, competing priorities, and financial considerations. Then, using examples from schools and primary care, we elucidate unique contextual considerations and implementation challenges in these settings. Finally, we articulate a research agenda for advancing implementation of evidence-based practices in nonspecialty mental health including highlighting promising implementation strategies (e.g., task shifting, adaptation) and the most relevant implementation outcomes to assess in these contexts (e.g., appropriateness, feasibility).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given that nonspecialty mental health settings deliver a large proportion of mental health care to traditionally underserved populations, there are important public health implications to advancing research in this area and ensuring implemented services are evidence-based. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":358476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"274-282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:精神卫生服务往往是在精神卫生不是主要任务的环境中实施的。学校、初级保健诊所、刑事司法和儿童福利机构以及老年人中心越来越多地在其服务纲要中增加心理保健,因为这些环境中心理保健需求的比例很高。尽管在精神卫生保健传统上不是服务模式的一部分的环境中实施精神卫生做法面临许多挑战,但这些环境中对精神卫生服务的需求正在增长。实施科学提供了一个视角,通过它可以理解在这些环境中实施精神卫生服务的独特挑战和潜在解决方案,最终目标是确保实施循证服务。方法和结果:在这篇概念性文章中,我们讨论了在非专业心理健康环境中实施循证心理健康干预的常见障碍,如劳动力挑战、竞争优先事项和财务考虑。然后,使用学校和初级保健的例子,我们阐明了在这些环境中独特的背景考虑和实施挑战。最后,我们阐明了在非专业心理健康领域推进循证实践的研究议程,包括强调有希望的实施策略(例如,任务转移,适应)和在这些背景下评估最相关的实施结果(例如,适当性,可行性)。结论:鉴于非专业精神卫生机构为传统上服务不足的人群提供了很大比例的精神卫生保健,因此推进这一领域的研究并确保实施的服务以证据为基础具有重要的公共卫生意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
Implementing evidence-based practices in nonspecialty mental health settings.
Objective: Mental health services are often implemented in settings in which mental health is not the primary mission. Schools, primary care clinics, criminal justice and child welfare institutions, and senior centers have been increasingly adding mental health care to their compendium of services owing to the high rates of mental health needs in these settings. Despite numerous challenges to implementing mental health practices in settings where mental health care has not traditionally been a part of the service model, the demand for mental health services in these settings is growing. Implementation science offers a lens through which to understand unique challenges and potential solutions to implementing mental health services in these settings, with the ultimate goal of ensuring the implementation of evidence-based services.
Method and results: In this conceptual article, we discuss common overarching barriers to implementing evidence-based mental health interventions in nonspecialty mental health settings, such as workforce challenges, competing priorities, and financial considerations. Then, using examples from schools and primary care, we elucidate unique contextual considerations and implementation challenges in these settings. Finally, we articulate a research agenda for advancing implementation of evidence-based practices in nonspecialty mental health including highlighting promising implementation strategies (e.g., task shifting, adaptation) and the most relevant implementation outcomes to assess in these contexts (e.g., appropriateness, feasibility).
Conclusions: Given that nonspecialty mental health settings deliver a large proportion of mental health care to traditionally underserved populations, there are important public health implications to advancing research in this area and ensuring implemented services are evidence-based. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).