正义与金钱之间:科维德-19 危机是如何被用来消除厄瓜多尔的合法性差异的》(How the Covid-19 Crisis was used to De-Differentiate Legality in Ecuador)。

Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-05 DOI:10.1007/s11196-021-09877-z
Katiuska King, Philipp Altmann
{"title":"正义与金钱之间:科维德-19 危机是如何被用来消除厄瓜多尔的合法性差异的》(How the Covid-19 Crisis was used to De-Differentiate Legality in Ecuador)。","authors":"Katiuska King, Philipp Altmann","doi":"10.1007/s11196-021-09877-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Legality in the Global South suffers from problems of application by convenience. Some rules are applied, and some are not, depending on certain actors, such as the State, the stakeholders, or others. This undermines legitimation as constructed by legality and due process. These problems are connected to a wider complex formed by coloniality, internal colonialism, and a form of functional differentiation that limits autonomy of the different social systems. This complex of structural properties allows States and other actors to systematically use one system against the other or-within a given system-one level of rules against the other. This was the case in Ecuador: in the initial months of quarantine due to Covid-19, the government took decisions about external state bonds following international legislation-and quite contrary ones related to local work contracts. Once again, legality followed different paths in diverse cases. Ecuadorian economic authorities accept and respect conditions on external public bonds which are protected by some complex and specific clauses to secure the payment. The same authorities have different practices towards international and national legislation that were organized in the sense of legal subsidiarity. This text will explore reasons and effects of legal de-differentiation in the Global South in times of crisis. The Ecuadorian case in time of Covid-19 helps to understand how structural problems related to the lack of autonomy of the legal system are perpetuated and lead to effects of convenient political action.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between Justice and Money: How the Covid-19 Crisis was used to De-Differentiate Legality in Ecuador.\",\"authors\":\"Katiuska King, Philipp Altmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11196-021-09877-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Legality in the Global South suffers from problems of application by convenience. Some rules are applied, and some are not, depending on certain actors, such as the State, the stakeholders, or others. This undermines legitimation as constructed by legality and due process. These problems are connected to a wider complex formed by coloniality, internal colonialism, and a form of functional differentiation that limits autonomy of the different social systems. This complex of structural properties allows States and other actors to systematically use one system against the other or-within a given system-one level of rules against the other. This was the case in Ecuador: in the initial months of quarantine due to Covid-19, the government took decisions about external state bonds following international legislation-and quite contrary ones related to local work contracts. Once again, legality followed different paths in diverse cases. Ecuadorian economic authorities accept and respect conditions on external public bonds which are protected by some complex and specific clauses to secure the payment. The same authorities have different practices towards international and national legislation that were organized in the sense of legal subsidiarity. This text will explore reasons and effects of legal de-differentiation in the Global South in times of crisis. The Ecuadorian case in time of Covid-19 helps to understand how structural problems related to the lack of autonomy of the legal system are perpetuated and lead to effects of convenient political action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728482/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09877-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09877-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球南部地区的合法性存在着 "方便适用 "的问题。有些规则适用,有些规则不适用,这取决于某些行为者,如国家、利益相关者或其他人。这破坏了合法性和正当程序所构建的合法性。这些问题与殖民主义、内部殖民主义以及限制不同社会体系自治的功能分化形式所形成的更广泛的综合体相关联。这种复杂的结构特性使得国家和其他行为者可以有计划地利用一种制度来对抗另一种制度,或者在特定制度中利用一个层次的规则来对抗另一个层次的规则。厄瓜多尔的情况就是如此:在因 Covid-19 而被隔离的最初几个月里,政府根据国际法律做出了有关外部国家债券的决定,而与之相反的决定则涉及当地的工作合同。同样,在不同的情况下,合法性遵循不同的路径。厄瓜多尔经济当局接受并尊重外部公共债券的条件,这些条件受到一些复杂而具体的条款的保护,以确保支付。同样的当局对国际和国内立法有不同的做法,这些立法都是按照法律辅助性的原则制定的。本文将探讨危机时期全球南部法律去差异化的原因和影响。19科维德时期的厄瓜多尔案例有助于理解与法律体系缺乏自主性有关的结构性问题是如何长期存在并导致便捷的政治行动产生影响的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Between Justice and Money: How the Covid-19 Crisis was used to De-Differentiate Legality in Ecuador.

Between Justice and Money: How the Covid-19 Crisis was used to De-Differentiate Legality in Ecuador.

分享
查看原文
Between Justice and Money: How the Covid-19 Crisis was used to De-Differentiate Legality in Ecuador.

Legality in the Global South suffers from problems of application by convenience. Some rules are applied, and some are not, depending on certain actors, such as the State, the stakeholders, or others. This undermines legitimation as constructed by legality and due process. These problems are connected to a wider complex formed by coloniality, internal colonialism, and a form of functional differentiation that limits autonomy of the different social systems. This complex of structural properties allows States and other actors to systematically use one system against the other or-within a given system-one level of rules against the other. This was the case in Ecuador: in the initial months of quarantine due to Covid-19, the government took decisions about external state bonds following international legislation-and quite contrary ones related to local work contracts. Once again, legality followed different paths in diverse cases. Ecuadorian economic authorities accept and respect conditions on external public bonds which are protected by some complex and specific clauses to secure the payment. The same authorities have different practices towards international and national legislation that were organized in the sense of legal subsidiarity. This text will explore reasons and effects of legal de-differentiation in the Global South in times of crisis. The Ecuadorian case in time of Covid-19 helps to understand how structural problems related to the lack of autonomy of the legal system are perpetuated and lead to effects of convenient political action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信