吸烟人群肺癌筛查的相关因素

IF 1.7
MDM policy & practice Pub Date : 2021-12-17 eCollection Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683211067810
Kristin G Maki, Kaiping Liao, Lisa M Lowenstein, M Angeles Lopez-Olivo, Robert J Volk
{"title":"吸烟人群肺癌筛查的相关因素","authors":"Kristin G Maki,&nbsp;Kaiping Liao,&nbsp;Lisa M Lowenstein,&nbsp;M Angeles Lopez-Olivo,&nbsp;Robert J Volk","doi":"10.1177/23814683211067810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Screening with low-dose computed tomography scans can reduce lung cancer deaths but uptake remains low. This study examines psychosocial factors associated with obtaining lung cancer screening (LCS) among individuals. <b>Methods.</b> This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial conducted with 13 state quitlines' clients. Participants who met age and smoking history criteria were enrolled and followed-up for 6 months. Only participants randomized to the intervention group (a patient decision aid) were included in this analysis. A logistic regression was performed to identify determinants of obtaining LCS 6 months after the intervention. <b>Results.</b> There were 204 participants included in this study. Regarding individual attitudes, high and moderate levels of concern about overdiagnosis were associated with a decreased likelihood of obtaining LCS compared with lower levels of concern (high levels of concern, odds ratio [OR] 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.65; moderate levels of concern, OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.53). In contrast, higher levels of anticipated regret about not obtaining LCS and later being diagnosed with lung cancer were associated with an increased likelihood of being screened compared with lower levels of anticipated regret (OR 5.59, 95% CI 1.72-18.10). Other potential harms related to LCS were not significant. <b>Limitations.</b> Follow-up may not have been long enough for all individuals who wished to be screened to complete the scan. Additionally, participants may have been more health motivated due to recruitment via tobacco quitlines. <b>Conclusions.</b> Anticipated regret about not obtaining screening is associated with screening behavior, whereas concern about overdiagnosis is associated with decreased likelihood of LCS. <b>Implications.</b> Decision support research may benefit from further examining anticipated regret in screening decisions. Additional training and information may be helpful to address concerns regarding overdiagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":520707,"journal":{"name":"MDM policy & practice","volume":" ","pages":"23814683211067810"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/04/10.1177_23814683211067810.PMC8725001.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated With Obtaining Lung Cancer Screening Among Persons Who Smoke.\",\"authors\":\"Kristin G Maki,&nbsp;Kaiping Liao,&nbsp;Lisa M Lowenstein,&nbsp;M Angeles Lopez-Olivo,&nbsp;Robert J Volk\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23814683211067810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Screening with low-dose computed tomography scans can reduce lung cancer deaths but uptake remains low. This study examines psychosocial factors associated with obtaining lung cancer screening (LCS) among individuals. <b>Methods.</b> This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial conducted with 13 state quitlines' clients. Participants who met age and smoking history criteria were enrolled and followed-up for 6 months. Only participants randomized to the intervention group (a patient decision aid) were included in this analysis. A logistic regression was performed to identify determinants of obtaining LCS 6 months after the intervention. <b>Results.</b> There were 204 participants included in this study. Regarding individual attitudes, high and moderate levels of concern about overdiagnosis were associated with a decreased likelihood of obtaining LCS compared with lower levels of concern (high levels of concern, odds ratio [OR] 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.65; moderate levels of concern, OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.53). In contrast, higher levels of anticipated regret about not obtaining LCS and later being diagnosed with lung cancer were associated with an increased likelihood of being screened compared with lower levels of anticipated regret (OR 5.59, 95% CI 1.72-18.10). Other potential harms related to LCS were not significant. <b>Limitations.</b> Follow-up may not have been long enough for all individuals who wished to be screened to complete the scan. Additionally, participants may have been more health motivated due to recruitment via tobacco quitlines. <b>Conclusions.</b> Anticipated regret about not obtaining screening is associated with screening behavior, whereas concern about overdiagnosis is associated with decreased likelihood of LCS. <b>Implications.</b> Decision support research may benefit from further examining anticipated regret in screening decisions. Additional training and information may be helpful to address concerns regarding overdiagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MDM policy & practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"23814683211067810\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/04/10.1177_23814683211067810.PMC8725001.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MDM policy & practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683211067810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM policy & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683211067810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查可以降低肺癌死亡率,但摄取率仍然很低。本研究探讨了个体中与获得肺癌筛查(LCS)相关的社会心理因素。方法。这是对13个州戒烟热线客户进行的随机临床试验的二次分析。符合年龄和吸烟史标准的参与者入组并随访6个月。只有随机分配到干预组(患者决策辅助)的参与者被纳入本分析。进行逻辑回归以确定干预后6个月获得LCS的决定因素。结果。本研究共纳入204名受试者。就个人态度而言,与较低水平的担忧相比,对过度诊断的高度和中度担忧与获得LCS的可能性降低相关(高度担忧,优势比[OR] 0.17, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.04-0.65;中度担忧,OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.53)。相比之下,与较低水平的预期后悔相比,较高水平的未获得LCS和后来被诊断为肺癌的预期后悔与接受筛查的可能性增加相关(OR 5.59, 95% CI 1.72-18.10)。与LCS相关的其他潜在危害不显著。的局限性。随访时间可能不够长,无法让所有希望接受筛查的人完成扫描。此外,由于通过戒烟热线招募,参与者可能更有健康动机。结论。对未接受筛查的预期后悔与筛查行为有关,而对过度诊断的担忧与LCS的可能性降低有关。的影响。决策支持研究可能受益于进一步检查筛选决策中的预期后悔。额外的培训和信息可能有助于解决过度诊断的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Factors Associated With Obtaining Lung Cancer Screening Among Persons Who Smoke.

Factors Associated With Obtaining Lung Cancer Screening Among Persons Who Smoke.

Factors Associated With Obtaining Lung Cancer Screening Among Persons Who Smoke.

Factors Associated With Obtaining Lung Cancer Screening Among Persons Who Smoke.

Background. Screening with low-dose computed tomography scans can reduce lung cancer deaths but uptake remains low. This study examines psychosocial factors associated with obtaining lung cancer screening (LCS) among individuals. Methods. This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial conducted with 13 state quitlines' clients. Participants who met age and smoking history criteria were enrolled and followed-up for 6 months. Only participants randomized to the intervention group (a patient decision aid) were included in this analysis. A logistic regression was performed to identify determinants of obtaining LCS 6 months after the intervention. Results. There were 204 participants included in this study. Regarding individual attitudes, high and moderate levels of concern about overdiagnosis were associated with a decreased likelihood of obtaining LCS compared with lower levels of concern (high levels of concern, odds ratio [OR] 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.65; moderate levels of concern, OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.53). In contrast, higher levels of anticipated regret about not obtaining LCS and later being diagnosed with lung cancer were associated with an increased likelihood of being screened compared with lower levels of anticipated regret (OR 5.59, 95% CI 1.72-18.10). Other potential harms related to LCS were not significant. Limitations. Follow-up may not have been long enough for all individuals who wished to be screened to complete the scan. Additionally, participants may have been more health motivated due to recruitment via tobacco quitlines. Conclusions. Anticipated regret about not obtaining screening is associated with screening behavior, whereas concern about overdiagnosis is associated with decreased likelihood of LCS. Implications. Decision support research may benefit from further examining anticipated regret in screening decisions. Additional training and information may be helpful to address concerns regarding overdiagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信