不可逆性牙髓炎患者下颌牙补充韧带内注射的麻醉效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Alpa Gupta, Jitesh Wadhwa, Vivek Aggarwal, Namrata Mehta, Dax Abraham, Kritika Aneja, Arundeep Singh
{"title":"不可逆性牙髓炎患者下颌牙补充韧带内注射的麻醉效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alpa Gupta,&nbsp;Jitesh Wadhwa,&nbsp;Vivek Aggarwal,&nbsp;Namrata Mehta,&nbsp;Dax Abraham,&nbsp;Kritika Aneja,&nbsp;Arundeep Singh","doi":"10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is known to have a lower success rate for anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. This calls for supplementary techniques to effectively anesthetize such patients. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the published literature for determining the success rate of anesthesia induction using post-IANB intraligamentary (IL) injection in the mandibular teeth of patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. The review question was, \"What is the success rate of IL injection in the mandibular teeth of patients with irreversible pulpitis as a supplementary technique for endodontic treatment?\"</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough search of electronic databases and manual searches were performed. The protocol of the review was framed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with a proper criterion for inclusion and exclusion of studies. The included studies were analyzed using the Cochrane Collaboration ''Risk of Bias'' tool. A meta-analysis that included a comparison of primary nerve block and supplemental IL injection was performed. The success rate was evaluated using the combined risk ratio (RR) with a random risk model. A funnel plot was created to measure publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After all analyses, four studies were included. In the forest plot representation, RRs were 3.56 (95% CI: 2.86, 4.44), which were in favor of the supplemental IL injections. Statistical heterogeneity was found to be 0%. These values suggest that supplemental IL injections provide better success rates for anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the pooled qualitative and quantitative analyses, supplemental IL injections increased anesthetic efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/78/jdapm-22-1.PMC8814730.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraligamentary injection in human mandibular teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alpa Gupta,&nbsp;Jitesh Wadhwa,&nbsp;Vivek Aggarwal,&nbsp;Namrata Mehta,&nbsp;Dax Abraham,&nbsp;Kritika Aneja,&nbsp;Arundeep Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is known to have a lower success rate for anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. This calls for supplementary techniques to effectively anesthetize such patients. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the published literature for determining the success rate of anesthesia induction using post-IANB intraligamentary (IL) injection in the mandibular teeth of patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. The review question was, \\\"What is the success rate of IL injection in the mandibular teeth of patients with irreversible pulpitis as a supplementary technique for endodontic treatment?\\\"</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough search of electronic databases and manual searches were performed. The protocol of the review was framed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with a proper criterion for inclusion and exclusion of studies. The included studies were analyzed using the Cochrane Collaboration ''Risk of Bias'' tool. A meta-analysis that included a comparison of primary nerve block and supplemental IL injection was performed. The success rate was evaluated using the combined risk ratio (RR) with a random risk model. A funnel plot was created to measure publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After all analyses, four studies were included. In the forest plot representation, RRs were 3.56 (95% CI: 2.86, 4.44), which were in favor of the supplemental IL injections. Statistical heterogeneity was found to be 0%. These values suggest that supplemental IL injections provide better success rates for anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the pooled qualitative and quantitative analyses, supplemental IL injections increased anesthetic efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/78/jdapm-22-1.PMC8814730.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)在不可逆性牙髓炎患者的麻醉成功率较低。这就需要辅助技术来有效地麻醉这些患者。本系统综述旨在评估已发表的用于确定症状性不可逆性牙髓炎患者下颌骨使用ianb后韧带内注射(IL)诱导麻醉成功率的文献。综述的问题是:“不可逆性牙髓炎患者下颌骨注射IL作为牙髓治疗辅助技术的成功率是多少?”方法:全面查阅电子数据库并进行人工检索。该综述的方案是按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单制定的,并在正在进行的系统评价的国际前瞻性登记册(PROSPERO)上注册,并有适当的纳入和排除研究的标准。纳入的研究使用Cochrane协作的“偏倚风险”工具进行分析。进行了一项荟萃分析,比较了初级神经阻滞和补充IL注射。采用随机风险模型联合风险比(RR)评价成功率。建立漏斗图来测量发表偏倚。结果:经过所有分析,纳入了4项研究。在森林样地表示中,相对危险度为3.56 (95% CI: 2.86, 4.44),支持补充注射IL。统计异质性为0%。这些值表明补充注射IL可提高麻醉成功率。结论:综合定性和定量分析,补充注射IL可提高麻醉效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraligamentary injection in human mandibular teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraligamentary injection in human mandibular teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraligamentary injection in human mandibular teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraligamentary injection in human mandibular teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is known to have a lower success rate for anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. This calls for supplementary techniques to effectively anesthetize such patients. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the published literature for determining the success rate of anesthesia induction using post-IANB intraligamentary (IL) injection in the mandibular teeth of patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. The review question was, "What is the success rate of IL injection in the mandibular teeth of patients with irreversible pulpitis as a supplementary technique for endodontic treatment?"

Methods: A thorough search of electronic databases and manual searches were performed. The protocol of the review was framed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with a proper criterion for inclusion and exclusion of studies. The included studies were analyzed using the Cochrane Collaboration ''Risk of Bias'' tool. A meta-analysis that included a comparison of primary nerve block and supplemental IL injection was performed. The success rate was evaluated using the combined risk ratio (RR) with a random risk model. A funnel plot was created to measure publication bias.

Results: After all analyses, four studies were included. In the forest plot representation, RRs were 3.56 (95% CI: 2.86, 4.44), which were in favor of the supplemental IL injections. Statistical heterogeneity was found to be 0%. These values suggest that supplemental IL injections provide better success rates for anesthesia.

Conclusion: According to the pooled qualitative and quantitative analyses, supplemental IL injections increased anesthetic efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信