门诊血液透析室抗菌药物的使用模式。

IF 0.6 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sylvia Sivarajahkumar, Miranda So, Andrew M Morris, Charmaine Lok, Chaim M Bell, Marisa Battistella
{"title":"门诊血液透析室抗菌药物的使用模式。","authors":"Sylvia Sivarajahkumar, Miranda So, Andrew M Morris, Charmaine Lok, Chaim M Bell, Marisa Battistella","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.v75i1.3250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) are at high risk of infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. Given that antimicrobial exposure is a major risk factor for the emergence of these resistant organisms, minimizing inappropriate use is imperative. To optimize use, it is important to understand patterns of antimicrobial prescribing in this setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure antimicrobial use and to describe prescribing patterns among patients receiving outpatient HD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational case series study was performed in an outpatient HD unit from February to April 2017. Adults for whom at least 1 antimicrobial was prescribed were included. The primary outcome was total antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days. Secondary outcomes were the characteristics of the antimicrobial prescriptions, in terms of antimicrobial class, indication, purpose, route, and prescriber group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Antimicrobials were prescribed for 53 (16%) of the 330 patients treated in the HD unit during the study period; the total number of prescriptions was 75. Antimicrobial use was 27.5 DOTs/1000 patient-days. Fluoroquinolones were the most frequently prescribed type of antimicrobial (<i>n</i> = 17, 23%), whereas the second most frequently prescribed were first-generation cephalosporins (<i>n</i> = 16, 21%). The most common indication was skin or soft-tissue infection (<i>n</i> = 14, 19%), followed by bloodstream infection (<i>n</i> = 13, 17%). Of the 75 antimicrobials, 48 (64%) were prescribed for empiric therapy, 19 (25%) for targeted therapy, and 8 (11%) for prophylaxis. Two-thirds of the antimicrobials prescribed (<i>n</i> = 50, 67%) were oral medications, and most (<i>n</i> = 72, 96%) were ordered by hospital prescribers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antimicrobial use was common in this study setting, with 1 in 6 HD patients receiving this type of medication. The findings of this study create opportunities to standardize antimicrobial prescribing at the local level for common infections that occur in patients receiving outpatient HD.</p>","PeriodicalId":51646,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","volume":"75 1","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677003/pdf/cjhp-75-15.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of Antimicrobial Use in an Outpatient Hemodialysis Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Sylvia Sivarajahkumar, Miranda So, Andrew M Morris, Charmaine Lok, Chaim M Bell, Marisa Battistella\",\"doi\":\"10.4212/cjhp.v75i1.3250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) are at high risk of infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. Given that antimicrobial exposure is a major risk factor for the emergence of these resistant organisms, minimizing inappropriate use is imperative. To optimize use, it is important to understand patterns of antimicrobial prescribing in this setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure antimicrobial use and to describe prescribing patterns among patients receiving outpatient HD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational case series study was performed in an outpatient HD unit from February to April 2017. Adults for whom at least 1 antimicrobial was prescribed were included. The primary outcome was total antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days. Secondary outcomes were the characteristics of the antimicrobial prescriptions, in terms of antimicrobial class, indication, purpose, route, and prescriber group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Antimicrobials were prescribed for 53 (16%) of the 330 patients treated in the HD unit during the study period; the total number of prescriptions was 75. Antimicrobial use was 27.5 DOTs/1000 patient-days. Fluoroquinolones were the most frequently prescribed type of antimicrobial (<i>n</i> = 17, 23%), whereas the second most frequently prescribed were first-generation cephalosporins (<i>n</i> = 16, 21%). The most common indication was skin or soft-tissue infection (<i>n</i> = 14, 19%), followed by bloodstream infection (<i>n</i> = 13, 17%). Of the 75 antimicrobials, 48 (64%) were prescribed for empiric therapy, 19 (25%) for targeted therapy, and 8 (11%) for prophylaxis. Two-thirds of the antimicrobials prescribed (<i>n</i> = 50, 67%) were oral medications, and most (<i>n</i> = 72, 96%) were ordered by hospital prescribers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antimicrobial use was common in this study setting, with 1 in 6 HD patients receiving this type of medication. The findings of this study create opportunities to standardize antimicrobial prescribing at the local level for common infections that occur in patients receiving outpatient HD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"15-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677003/pdf/cjhp-75-15.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v75i1.3250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v75i1.3250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接受血液透析(HD)的患者感染风险很高,包括由耐多药生物引起的感染。鉴于抗菌药物暴露是这些耐药生物体出现的主要风险因素,最大限度地减少不适当使用抗菌药物势在必行。要优化抗菌药物的使用,就必须了解这种情况下的抗菌药物处方模式:测量门诊血液透析患者的抗菌药物使用情况并描述处方模式:方法:2017年2月至4月,在门诊HD病房开展了一项回顾性观察病例系列研究。研究纳入了至少使用过一种抗菌药物的成人患者。主要结果是每 1000 个患者日的抗菌治疗总天数(DOT)。次要结果是抗菌药物处方的特点,包括抗菌药物类别、适应症、目的、途径和处方者群体:研究期间,在血液透析室接受治疗的 330 名患者中有 53 人(16%)开具了抗菌药处方,处方总数为 75 个。抗菌药物使用率为 27.5 DOTs/1000个患者日。氟喹诺酮类是最常处方的抗菌药类型(n = 17,23%),而第二常处方是第一代头孢菌素(n = 16,21%)。最常见的适应症是皮肤或软组织感染(14 人,19%),其次是血流感染(13 人,17%)。在 75 种抗菌药物中,48 种(64%)用于经验性治疗,19 种(25%)用于针对性治疗,8 种(11%)用于预防性治疗。三分之二的抗菌药物处方(n = 50,67%)为口服药物,大部分(n = 72,96%)由医院处方医生开具:结论:在这项研究中,抗菌药物的使用非常普遍,每 6 名血液透析患者中就有 1 人接受此类药物治疗。这项研究的结果为在地方一级规范门诊血液透析患者常见感染的抗菌药物处方创造了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patterns of Antimicrobial Use in an Outpatient Hemodialysis Unit.

Patterns of Antimicrobial Use in an Outpatient Hemodialysis Unit.

Background: Patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) are at high risk of infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. Given that antimicrobial exposure is a major risk factor for the emergence of these resistant organisms, minimizing inappropriate use is imperative. To optimize use, it is important to understand patterns of antimicrobial prescribing in this setting.

Objectives: To measure antimicrobial use and to describe prescribing patterns among patients receiving outpatient HD.

Methods: A retrospective observational case series study was performed in an outpatient HD unit from February to April 2017. Adults for whom at least 1 antimicrobial was prescribed were included. The primary outcome was total antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days. Secondary outcomes were the characteristics of the antimicrobial prescriptions, in terms of antimicrobial class, indication, purpose, route, and prescriber group.

Results: Antimicrobials were prescribed for 53 (16%) of the 330 patients treated in the HD unit during the study period; the total number of prescriptions was 75. Antimicrobial use was 27.5 DOTs/1000 patient-days. Fluoroquinolones were the most frequently prescribed type of antimicrobial (n = 17, 23%), whereas the second most frequently prescribed were first-generation cephalosporins (n = 16, 21%). The most common indication was skin or soft-tissue infection (n = 14, 19%), followed by bloodstream infection (n = 13, 17%). Of the 75 antimicrobials, 48 (64%) were prescribed for empiric therapy, 19 (25%) for targeted therapy, and 8 (11%) for prophylaxis. Two-thirds of the antimicrobials prescribed (n = 50, 67%) were oral medications, and most (n = 72, 96%) were ordered by hospital prescribers.

Conclusions: Antimicrobial use was common in this study setting, with 1 in 6 HD patients receiving this type of medication. The findings of this study create opportunities to standardize antimicrobial prescribing at the local level for common infections that occur in patients receiving outpatient HD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The CJHP is an academic journal that focuses on how pharmacists in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings optimize safe and effective drug use for patients in Canada and throughout the world. The aim of the CJHP is to be a respected international publication serving as a major venue for dissemination of information related to patient-centred pharmacy practice in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings in Canada and throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信