2019冠状病毒病对斯里兰卡一线和非一线医护人员心理健康的影响

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Anuradha Baminiwatta, Shamila De Silva, Aruni Hapangama, Kumarini Basnayake, Charani Abayaweera, Dinithi Kulasinghe, Dewmi Kaushalya, Shehan Williams
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病对斯里兰卡一线和非一线医护人员心理健康的影响","authors":"Anuradha Baminiwatta,&nbsp;Shamila De Silva,&nbsp;Aruni Hapangama,&nbsp;Kumarini Basnayake,&nbsp;Charani Abayaweera,&nbsp;Dinithi Kulasinghe,&nbsp;Dewmi Kaushalya,&nbsp;Shehan Williams","doi":"10.4038/cmj.v66i1.9351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\nHealthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of mental health problems during a pandemic. Being stationed at the frontline or not may have implications on their mental health.\n\n\nObjectives\nThe aims of this study were to assess depression, anxiety and stress among HCWs, to explore differences between frontline and non-frontline workers, and to investigate associated factors.\n\n\nMethods\nIn this cross-sectional study, frontline and non-frontline HCWs were recruited from a COVID-19 screening hospital in Sri Lanka. Mental health impact was assessed using Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Sociodemographic data and perceptions of social and occupational circumstances were gathered. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi square and logistic regression. Odds ratios were calculated for the effect of different perceptions on psychological morbidity.\n\n\nResults\nA total of 467 HCWs participated, comprising 244 (52.2%) frontline and 223 (47.8%) non-frontline workers, with female preponderance (n=341, 77%). Prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress among HCWs were 19.5%, 20.6%, 11.8%, respectively. Non-frontline group showed a higher prevalence of depression (27% vs. 11%, p<0.001), anxiety (27% vs. 14%, p=0.001) and stress (15% vs. 8%, p=0.026). Being married, having children, living with family and higher income were associated with better psychological outcomes. Perceived lack of personal protective equipment, inadequate support from hospital authorities, greater discrimination, and lack of training to cope with the situation predicted poor mental health outcomes, and non-frontline HCWs were more likely to hold such perceptions.\n\n\nConclusion\nAddressing factors leading to negative psychological outcomes in HCWs should be a key concern during this pandemic.","PeriodicalId":9777,"journal":{"name":"Ceylon Medical Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":"16-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of frontline and non-frontline healthcare workers in Sri Lanka.\",\"authors\":\"Anuradha Baminiwatta,&nbsp;Shamila De Silva,&nbsp;Aruni Hapangama,&nbsp;Kumarini Basnayake,&nbsp;Charani Abayaweera,&nbsp;Dinithi Kulasinghe,&nbsp;Dewmi Kaushalya,&nbsp;Shehan Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/cmj.v66i1.9351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction\\nHealthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of mental health problems during a pandemic. Being stationed at the frontline or not may have implications on their mental health.\\n\\n\\nObjectives\\nThe aims of this study were to assess depression, anxiety and stress among HCWs, to explore differences between frontline and non-frontline workers, and to investigate associated factors.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nIn this cross-sectional study, frontline and non-frontline HCWs were recruited from a COVID-19 screening hospital in Sri Lanka. Mental health impact was assessed using Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Sociodemographic data and perceptions of social and occupational circumstances were gathered. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi square and logistic regression. Odds ratios were calculated for the effect of different perceptions on psychological morbidity.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nA total of 467 HCWs participated, comprising 244 (52.2%) frontline and 223 (47.8%) non-frontline workers, with female preponderance (n=341, 77%). Prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress among HCWs were 19.5%, 20.6%, 11.8%, respectively. Non-frontline group showed a higher prevalence of depression (27% vs. 11%, p<0.001), anxiety (27% vs. 14%, p=0.001) and stress (15% vs. 8%, p=0.026). Being married, having children, living with family and higher income were associated with better psychological outcomes. Perceived lack of personal protective equipment, inadequate support from hospital authorities, greater discrimination, and lack of training to cope with the situation predicted poor mental health outcomes, and non-frontline HCWs were more likely to hold such perceptions.\\n\\n\\nConclusion\\nAddressing factors leading to negative psychological outcomes in HCWs should be a key concern during this pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceylon Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"16-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceylon Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v66i1.9351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceylon Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v66i1.9351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在大流行期间,卫生保健工作者(HCWs)面临精神健康问题的风险。是否驻扎在前线可能对他们的心理健康产生影响。目的:本研究旨在评估医护人员的抑郁、焦虑和压力,探讨一线与非一线医护人员的差异,并探讨相关因素。方法:在横断面研究中,从斯里兰卡一家COVID-19筛查医院招募一线和非一线医护人员。采用抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21)评估心理健康影响。收集了社会人口统计数据和对社会和职业环境的看法。分类变量分析采用卡方和逻辑回归。计算了不同认知对心理疾病的影响的比值比。结果:共有467名医护人员参与调查,其中一线244人(52.2%),非一线223人(47.8%),女性占多数(n=341, 77%)。健康护理人员的抑郁、焦虑和压力患病率分别为19.5%、20.6%和11.8%。非一线组显示出更高的抑郁症患病率(27%对11%)。结论:在这次大流行期间,解决导致卫生保健工作者负面心理结果的因素应该是一个关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of frontline and non-frontline healthcare workers in Sri Lanka.
Introduction Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of mental health problems during a pandemic. Being stationed at the frontline or not may have implications on their mental health. Objectives The aims of this study were to assess depression, anxiety and stress among HCWs, to explore differences between frontline and non-frontline workers, and to investigate associated factors. Methods In this cross-sectional study, frontline and non-frontline HCWs were recruited from a COVID-19 screening hospital in Sri Lanka. Mental health impact was assessed using Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Sociodemographic data and perceptions of social and occupational circumstances were gathered. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi square and logistic regression. Odds ratios were calculated for the effect of different perceptions on psychological morbidity. Results A total of 467 HCWs participated, comprising 244 (52.2%) frontline and 223 (47.8%) non-frontline workers, with female preponderance (n=341, 77%). Prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress among HCWs were 19.5%, 20.6%, 11.8%, respectively. Non-frontline group showed a higher prevalence of depression (27% vs. 11%, p<0.001), anxiety (27% vs. 14%, p=0.001) and stress (15% vs. 8%, p=0.026). Being married, having children, living with family and higher income were associated with better psychological outcomes. Perceived lack of personal protective equipment, inadequate support from hospital authorities, greater discrimination, and lack of training to cope with the situation predicted poor mental health outcomes, and non-frontline HCWs were more likely to hold such perceptions. Conclusion Addressing factors leading to negative psychological outcomes in HCWs should be a key concern during this pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ceylon Medical Journal
Ceylon Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Ceylon Medical Journal, is the oldest surviving medical journal in Australasia. It is the only medical journal in Sri Lanka that is listed in the Index Medicus. The CMJ started life way back in 1887 as the organ of the Ceylon Branch of the British Medical Association. Except for a brief period between 1893 and 1904 when it ceased publication, the CMJ or its forbear, the Journal of the Ceylon Branch of the British Medical Association, has been published without interruption up to now. The journal"s name changed to the CMJ in 1954.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信