在综合卫生保健提供系统中对遗传性癌症综合征的遗传服务障碍和可及性的回顾性评估。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Kristin R Muessig, Jamilyn M Zepp, Erin Keast, Elizabeth E Shuster, Ana A Reyes, Briana Arnold, Chalinya Ingphakorn, Marian J Gilmore, Tia L Kauffman, Jessica Ezzell Hunter, Sarah Knerr, Heather S Feigelson, Katrina A B Goddard
{"title":"在综合卫生保健提供系统中对遗传性癌症综合征的遗传服务障碍和可及性的回顾性评估。","authors":"Kristin R Muessig,&nbsp;Jamilyn M Zepp,&nbsp;Erin Keast,&nbsp;Elizabeth E Shuster,&nbsp;Ana A Reyes,&nbsp;Briana Arnold,&nbsp;Chalinya Ingphakorn,&nbsp;Marian J Gilmore,&nbsp;Tia L Kauffman,&nbsp;Jessica Ezzell Hunter,&nbsp;Sarah Knerr,&nbsp;Heather S Feigelson,&nbsp;Katrina A B Goddard","doi":"10.1186/s13053-022-00213-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A critical step in access to genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes is referral for genetic counseling to assess personal and family risk. Individuals meeting testing guidelines have the greatest need to be evaluated. However, referrals to genetics are underutilized in US patients with hereditary cancer syndromes, especially within traditionally underserved populations, including racial and ethnic minorities, low-income, and non-English speaking patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied existing processes for referral to genetic evaluation and testing for hereditary cancer risk to identify areas of potential improvement in delivering these services, especially for traditionally underserved patients. We conducted a retrospective review of 820 referrals to the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) genetics department containing diagnosis codes for hereditary cancer risk. We classified referrals as high- or low-quality based on whether sufficient information was provided to determine if patients met national practice guidelines for testing. Through chart abstraction, we also assessed consistency with practice guidelines, whether the referral resulted in a visit to the genetics department for evaluation, and clinical characteristics of patients receiving genetic testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most referrals (n = 514, 63%) contained sufficient information to assess the appropriateness of referral; of those, 92% met practice guidelines for genetic testing. Half of referred patients (50%) were not offered genetic evaluation; only 31% received genetic testing. We identified several barriers to receiving genetic evaluation and testing, the biggest barrier being completion of a family history form sent to patients following the referral. Those with a referral consistent with testing guidelines, were more likely to receive genetic testing than those without (39% vs. 29%, respectively; p = 0.0058). Traditionally underserved patients were underrepresented in those receiving genetic evaluation and testing relative to the overall adult KPNW population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Process improvements are needed to increase access to genetic services to diagnose hereditary cancer syndromes prior to development of cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":55058,"journal":{"name":"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832647/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective assessment of barriers and access to genetic services for hereditary cancer syndromes in an integrated health care delivery system.\",\"authors\":\"Kristin R Muessig,&nbsp;Jamilyn M Zepp,&nbsp;Erin Keast,&nbsp;Elizabeth E Shuster,&nbsp;Ana A Reyes,&nbsp;Briana Arnold,&nbsp;Chalinya Ingphakorn,&nbsp;Marian J Gilmore,&nbsp;Tia L Kauffman,&nbsp;Jessica Ezzell Hunter,&nbsp;Sarah Knerr,&nbsp;Heather S Feigelson,&nbsp;Katrina A B Goddard\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13053-022-00213-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A critical step in access to genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes is referral for genetic counseling to assess personal and family risk. Individuals meeting testing guidelines have the greatest need to be evaluated. However, referrals to genetics are underutilized in US patients with hereditary cancer syndromes, especially within traditionally underserved populations, including racial and ethnic minorities, low-income, and non-English speaking patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied existing processes for referral to genetic evaluation and testing for hereditary cancer risk to identify areas of potential improvement in delivering these services, especially for traditionally underserved patients. We conducted a retrospective review of 820 referrals to the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) genetics department containing diagnosis codes for hereditary cancer risk. We classified referrals as high- or low-quality based on whether sufficient information was provided to determine if patients met national practice guidelines for testing. Through chart abstraction, we also assessed consistency with practice guidelines, whether the referral resulted in a visit to the genetics department for evaluation, and clinical characteristics of patients receiving genetic testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most referrals (n = 514, 63%) contained sufficient information to assess the appropriateness of referral; of those, 92% met practice guidelines for genetic testing. Half of referred patients (50%) were not offered genetic evaluation; only 31% received genetic testing. We identified several barriers to receiving genetic evaluation and testing, the biggest barrier being completion of a family history form sent to patients following the referral. Those with a referral consistent with testing guidelines, were more likely to receive genetic testing than those without (39% vs. 29%, respectively; p = 0.0058). Traditionally underserved patients were underrepresented in those receiving genetic evaluation and testing relative to the overall adult KPNW population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Process improvements are needed to increase access to genetic services to diagnose hereditary cancer syndromes prior to development of cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832647/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13053-022-00213-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13053-022-00213-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:获得遗传性癌症综合征基因检测的关键步骤是转诊进行遗传咨询以评估个人和家庭风险。符合测试指南的个人最需要被评估。然而,美国遗传性癌症综合征患者未充分利用遗传学,特别是在传统上服务不足的人群中,包括种族和少数民族、低收入和非英语患者。方法:我们研究了遗传评估和遗传癌症风险检测的现有流程,以确定提供这些服务的潜在改进领域,特别是对传统上服务不足的患者。我们对Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW)遗传科的820例转诊患者进行了回顾性分析,其中包含遗传性癌症风险的诊断代码。我们根据是否提供了足够的信息来确定患者是否符合国家测试实践指南,将转诊分为高质量或低质量。通过图表抽象,我们还评估了与实践指南的一致性,转诊是否导致访问遗传部门进行评估,以及接受基因检测的患者的临床特征。结果:大多数转诊(n = 514, 63%)包含足够的信息来评估转诊的适当性;其中,92%符合基因检测的实践指南。一半的转诊患者(50%)没有进行遗传评估;只有31%的人接受了基因检测。我们确定了接受基因评估和测试的几个障碍,最大的障碍是完成转诊后发送给患者的家族史表格。那些有符合检测指南的转诊的人比没有的人更有可能接受基因检测(分别为39%对29%;p = 0.0058)。传统上服务不足的患者在接受遗传评估和检测的患者中所占比例低于总体成年KPNW人群。结论:需要改进程序以增加获得遗传服务的机会,以便在癌症发展之前诊断遗传性癌症综合征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Retrospective assessment of barriers and access to genetic services for hereditary cancer syndromes in an integrated health care delivery system.

Retrospective assessment of barriers and access to genetic services for hereditary cancer syndromes in an integrated health care delivery system.

Retrospective assessment of barriers and access to genetic services for hereditary cancer syndromes in an integrated health care delivery system.

Retrospective assessment of barriers and access to genetic services for hereditary cancer syndromes in an integrated health care delivery system.

Background: A critical step in access to genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes is referral for genetic counseling to assess personal and family risk. Individuals meeting testing guidelines have the greatest need to be evaluated. However, referrals to genetics are underutilized in US patients with hereditary cancer syndromes, especially within traditionally underserved populations, including racial and ethnic minorities, low-income, and non-English speaking patients.

Methods: We studied existing processes for referral to genetic evaluation and testing for hereditary cancer risk to identify areas of potential improvement in delivering these services, especially for traditionally underserved patients. We conducted a retrospective review of 820 referrals to the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) genetics department containing diagnosis codes for hereditary cancer risk. We classified referrals as high- or low-quality based on whether sufficient information was provided to determine if patients met national practice guidelines for testing. Through chart abstraction, we also assessed consistency with practice guidelines, whether the referral resulted in a visit to the genetics department for evaluation, and clinical characteristics of patients receiving genetic testing.

Results: Most referrals (n = 514, 63%) contained sufficient information to assess the appropriateness of referral; of those, 92% met practice guidelines for genetic testing. Half of referred patients (50%) were not offered genetic evaluation; only 31% received genetic testing. We identified several barriers to receiving genetic evaluation and testing, the biggest barrier being completion of a family history form sent to patients following the referral. Those with a referral consistent with testing guidelines, were more likely to receive genetic testing than those without (39% vs. 29%, respectively; p = 0.0058). Traditionally underserved patients were underrepresented in those receiving genetic evaluation and testing relative to the overall adult KPNW population.

Conclusions: Process improvements are needed to increase access to genetic services to diagnose hereditary cancer syndromes prior to development of cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice is an open access journal that publishes articles of interest for the cancer genetics community and serves as a discussion forum for the development appropriate healthcare strategies. Cancer genetics encompasses a wide variety of disciplines and knowledge in the field is rapidly growing, especially as the amount of information linking genetic differences to inherited cancer predispositions continues expanding. With the increased knowledge of genetic variability and how this relates to cancer risk there is a growing demand not only to disseminate this information into clinical practice but also to enable competent debate concerning how such information is managed and what it implies for patient care. Topics covered by the journal include but are not limited to: Original research articles on any aspect of inherited predispositions to cancer. Reviews of inherited cancer predispositions. Application of molecular and cytogenetic analysis to clinical decision making. Clinical aspects of the management of hereditary cancers. Genetic counselling issues associated with cancer genetics. The role of registries in improving health care of patients with an inherited predisposition to cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信