大型阿米巴肝脓肿的强化引流方案。

Pub Date : 2021-12-23 eCollection Date: 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1740625
Jignesh A Gandhi, Pravin H Shinde, Sadashiv N Chaudhari, Amay M Banker
{"title":"大型阿米巴肝脓肿的强化引流方案。","authors":"Jignesh A Gandhi,&nbsp;Pravin H Shinde,&nbsp;Sadashiv N Chaudhari,&nbsp;Amay M Banker","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1740625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Amebic liver abscess (ALA) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in patients of the developing world. Even though medical management is the primary modality of treatment, 15% of the cases are refractory and require intervention for drainage. Pigtail catheterization is inefficient and results in a long duration of hospital stay. So, we conducted a prospective observational study to determine the efficacy and safety of drainage of large ALA using a wide bore 24 French (Fr) drain compared with a conventionally used 10 Fr pigtail catheter. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  A single center prospective observational study was conducted over a period of 5 years and data of 122 patients was collected. After starting empirical medical therapy, patients underwent drainage of ALA with either a 10 French pigtail or a 24 Fr drain. The primary outcome variables were resolution of clinical symptoms such as fever and pain in abdomen, length of hospital stay, and resolution of abscess on imaging at day 3. Secondary outcome was complications related to the procedures. <b>Results</b>  Data of 122 patients was collected. Males constituted a vast majority (96%) of the study population and the fifth decade was the most common age group involved. Alcoholics had a higher chance of developing a large ALA. Sixty-eight patients underwent drainage of the ALA using a 24 Fr drain which resulted in faster resolution of symptoms (2.4 vs. 5.1 days, <i>p</i> -value 0.033), a shorter duration of catheter in situ (6.4 vs. 13.2, <i>p</i> -value 0.011), and a faster drainage of ALA (residual volume at day 3; 177 vs. 212 mL, <i>p</i> -value 0.021). Twenty-eight patients had a biliary communication of which 26 required therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. <b>Conclusion</b>  In patients with a large ALA, placement of a wide bore 24 Fr catheter hastens recovery of the patients when compared with drainage with a standard 10 Fr pigtail catheter. Placement of a biliary stent serves as a useful adjunct for their management and it may obliviate the need for a major biliary diversion surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced Drainage Protocol in Large Amoebic Liver Abscess.\",\"authors\":\"Jignesh A Gandhi,&nbsp;Pravin H Shinde,&nbsp;Sadashiv N Chaudhari,&nbsp;Amay M Banker\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1740625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Amebic liver abscess (ALA) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in patients of the developing world. Even though medical management is the primary modality of treatment, 15% of the cases are refractory and require intervention for drainage. Pigtail catheterization is inefficient and results in a long duration of hospital stay. So, we conducted a prospective observational study to determine the efficacy and safety of drainage of large ALA using a wide bore 24 French (Fr) drain compared with a conventionally used 10 Fr pigtail catheter. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  A single center prospective observational study was conducted over a period of 5 years and data of 122 patients was collected. After starting empirical medical therapy, patients underwent drainage of ALA with either a 10 French pigtail or a 24 Fr drain. The primary outcome variables were resolution of clinical symptoms such as fever and pain in abdomen, length of hospital stay, and resolution of abscess on imaging at day 3. Secondary outcome was complications related to the procedures. <b>Results</b>  Data of 122 patients was collected. Males constituted a vast majority (96%) of the study population and the fifth decade was the most common age group involved. Alcoholics had a higher chance of developing a large ALA. Sixty-eight patients underwent drainage of the ALA using a 24 Fr drain which resulted in faster resolution of symptoms (2.4 vs. 5.1 days, <i>p</i> -value 0.033), a shorter duration of catheter in situ (6.4 vs. 13.2, <i>p</i> -value 0.011), and a faster drainage of ALA (residual volume at day 3; 177 vs. 212 mL, <i>p</i> -value 0.021). Twenty-eight patients had a biliary communication of which 26 required therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. <b>Conclusion</b>  In patients with a large ALA, placement of a wide bore 24 Fr catheter hastens recovery of the patients when compared with drainage with a standard 10 Fr pigtail catheter. Placement of a biliary stent serves as a useful adjunct for their management and it may obliviate the need for a major biliary diversion surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8702372/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿米巴肝脓肿(ALA)对发展中国家患者的发病率和死亡率有重要影响。尽管医疗管理是主要的治疗方式,但15%的病例是难治性的,需要干预引流。辫状导尿效率低,住院时间长。因此,我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,以确定使用宽孔24fr (Fr)引流管引流大ALA的有效性和安全性,并与传统使用的10fr细尾导管进行比较。材料与方法采用单中心前瞻性观察研究,为期5年,收集122例患者资料。在开始经验性药物治疗后,患者采用10法氏辫子或24法氏引流管引流ALA。主要结局变量是临床症状的缓解,如发热和腹部疼痛,住院时间,以及第3天影像学上脓肿的缓解。次要结果是与手术相关的并发症。结果共收集122例患者资料。男性占研究人群的绝大多数(96%),第五个十年是最常见的年龄组。酗酒者有更高的机会发展成一个大的ALA。68例患者使用24fr引流管引流ALA,症状缓解更快(2.4天vs. 5.1天,p值0.033),原位置管时间更短(6.4天vs. 13.2天,p值0.011),ALA引流更快(第3天残余容量;177对212 mL, p值0.021)。28例患者有胆道通信,其中26例需要内镜逆行胆管造影治疗。结论在大ALA患者中,与使用标准的10fr细尾导管引流相比,放置宽孔24fr导管可加速患者的恢复。胆道支架的放置是一种有效的辅助治疗方法,它可能会消除对胆道转移手术的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Enhanced Drainage Protocol in Large Amoebic Liver Abscess.

分享
查看原文
Enhanced Drainage Protocol in Large Amoebic Liver Abscess.

Background  Amebic liver abscess (ALA) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in patients of the developing world. Even though medical management is the primary modality of treatment, 15% of the cases are refractory and require intervention for drainage. Pigtail catheterization is inefficient and results in a long duration of hospital stay. So, we conducted a prospective observational study to determine the efficacy and safety of drainage of large ALA using a wide bore 24 French (Fr) drain compared with a conventionally used 10 Fr pigtail catheter. Materials and Methods  A single center prospective observational study was conducted over a period of 5 years and data of 122 patients was collected. After starting empirical medical therapy, patients underwent drainage of ALA with either a 10 French pigtail or a 24 Fr drain. The primary outcome variables were resolution of clinical symptoms such as fever and pain in abdomen, length of hospital stay, and resolution of abscess on imaging at day 3. Secondary outcome was complications related to the procedures. Results  Data of 122 patients was collected. Males constituted a vast majority (96%) of the study population and the fifth decade was the most common age group involved. Alcoholics had a higher chance of developing a large ALA. Sixty-eight patients underwent drainage of the ALA using a 24 Fr drain which resulted in faster resolution of symptoms (2.4 vs. 5.1 days, p -value 0.033), a shorter duration of catheter in situ (6.4 vs. 13.2, p -value 0.011), and a faster drainage of ALA (residual volume at day 3; 177 vs. 212 mL, p -value 0.021). Twenty-eight patients had a biliary communication of which 26 required therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Conclusion  In patients with a large ALA, placement of a wide bore 24 Fr catheter hastens recovery of the patients when compared with drainage with a standard 10 Fr pigtail catheter. Placement of a biliary stent serves as a useful adjunct for their management and it may obliviate the need for a major biliary diversion surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信