羞耻倾向与颞极白质结构的个体差异有关。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Social Neuroscience Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-14 DOI:10.1080/17470919.2022.2039287
Carlos Makoto Miyauchi, Hikaru Takeuchi, Yasuyuki Taki, Seishu Nakagawa, Sugiko Hanawa, Atsushi Sekiguchi, Rui Nouchi, Yuko Sassa, Ryuta Kawashima
{"title":"羞耻倾向与颞极白质结构的个体差异有关。","authors":"Carlos Makoto Miyauchi,&nbsp;Hikaru Takeuchi,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Taki,&nbsp;Seishu Nakagawa,&nbsp;Sugiko Hanawa,&nbsp;Atsushi Sekiguchi,&nbsp;Rui Nouchi,&nbsp;Yuko Sassa,&nbsp;Ryuta Kawashima","doi":"10.1080/17470919.2022.2039287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shame and guilt are distinct negative moral emotions, although they are usually regarded as overlapping affective experiences. Of these two emotions, shame is more closely related to concerns about other people's judgment, whereas guilt is more related to concerns about one's own judgment. Although some studies have tried to identify the psychological process underlying shame as opposed to guilt, there is no clear evidence of brain regions that are specifically relevant to the experience of shame rather than guilt and, more generally, self-blame. We therefore investigated associations between individual differences in shame- and guilt-proneness and the gray and white matter structures of the brain using magnetic resonance imaging and voxel-based morphometry while controlling for associations with guilt- or shame-proneness. To accomplish this goal, we enrolled 590 healthy, right-handed individuals (338 men and 252 women; age, 20.6 ± 1.8 years). We administered a questionnaire to assess shame proneness and guilt proneness. Based on our hypothesis, we found that high shame proneness was associated with decreased regional white matter density only in the right inferior temporal pole, whereas no significant region was associated with guilt. The function of this area may be important for the underlying processes differentiating shame from guilt.</p>","PeriodicalId":49511,"journal":{"name":"Social Neuroscience","volume":"17 2","pages":"117-126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shame proneness is associated with individual differences in temporal pole white matter structure.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Makoto Miyauchi,&nbsp;Hikaru Takeuchi,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Taki,&nbsp;Seishu Nakagawa,&nbsp;Sugiko Hanawa,&nbsp;Atsushi Sekiguchi,&nbsp;Rui Nouchi,&nbsp;Yuko Sassa,&nbsp;Ryuta Kawashima\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17470919.2022.2039287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Shame and guilt are distinct negative moral emotions, although they are usually regarded as overlapping affective experiences. Of these two emotions, shame is more closely related to concerns about other people's judgment, whereas guilt is more related to concerns about one's own judgment. Although some studies have tried to identify the psychological process underlying shame as opposed to guilt, there is no clear evidence of brain regions that are specifically relevant to the experience of shame rather than guilt and, more generally, self-blame. We therefore investigated associations between individual differences in shame- and guilt-proneness and the gray and white matter structures of the brain using magnetic resonance imaging and voxel-based morphometry while controlling for associations with guilt- or shame-proneness. To accomplish this goal, we enrolled 590 healthy, right-handed individuals (338 men and 252 women; age, 20.6 ± 1.8 years). We administered a questionnaire to assess shame proneness and guilt proneness. Based on our hypothesis, we found that high shame proneness was associated with decreased regional white matter density only in the right inferior temporal pole, whereas no significant region was associated with guilt. The function of this area may be important for the underlying processes differentiating shame from guilt.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"117-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2022.2039287\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2022.2039287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

羞耻和内疚是截然不同的消极道德情绪,尽管它们通常被视为重叠的情感体验。在这两种情绪中,羞耻感与担心别人的判断更密切相关,而内疚则与担心自己的判断更相关。尽管一些研究试图找出与内疚相反的羞耻感背后的心理过程,但没有明确的证据表明,大脑中有哪些区域与羞耻的经历有关,而不是与内疚和更普遍的自责有关。因此,我们使用磁共振成像和基于体素的形态测量法研究了羞耻和内疚倾向的个体差异与大脑灰质和白质结构之间的联系,同时控制了与内疚或羞耻倾向的联系。为了实现这一目标,我们招募了590名健康的右撇子个体(338名男性和252名女性;年龄(20.6±1.8岁)。我们使用了一份问卷来评估羞耻倾向和内疚倾向。根据我们的假设,我们发现高羞耻倾向只与右侧颞下极区域白质密度下降有关,而与内疚无关。这个区域的功能可能对区分羞耻和内疚的潜在过程很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shame proneness is associated with individual differences in temporal pole white matter structure.

Shame and guilt are distinct negative moral emotions, although they are usually regarded as overlapping affective experiences. Of these two emotions, shame is more closely related to concerns about other people's judgment, whereas guilt is more related to concerns about one's own judgment. Although some studies have tried to identify the psychological process underlying shame as opposed to guilt, there is no clear evidence of brain regions that are specifically relevant to the experience of shame rather than guilt and, more generally, self-blame. We therefore investigated associations between individual differences in shame- and guilt-proneness and the gray and white matter structures of the brain using magnetic resonance imaging and voxel-based morphometry while controlling for associations with guilt- or shame-proneness. To accomplish this goal, we enrolled 590 healthy, right-handed individuals (338 men and 252 women; age, 20.6 ± 1.8 years). We administered a questionnaire to assess shame proneness and guilt proneness. Based on our hypothesis, we found that high shame proneness was associated with decreased regional white matter density only in the right inferior temporal pole, whereas no significant region was associated with guilt. The function of this area may be important for the underlying processes differentiating shame from guilt.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Neuroscience
Social Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Neuroscience features original empirical Research Papers as well as targeted Reviews, Commentaries and Fast Track Brief Reports that examine how the brain mediates social behavior, social cognition, social interactions and relationships, group social dynamics, and related topics that deal with social/interpersonal psychology and neurobiology. Multi-paper symposia and special topic issues are organized and presented regularly as well. The goal of Social Neuroscience is to provide a place to publish empirical articles that intend to further our understanding of the neural mechanisms contributing to the development and maintenance of social behaviors, or to understanding how these mechanisms are disrupted in clinical disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信