在贝尔法斯特市医院跟进COVID-19。

Q3 Medicine
Ulster Medical Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-11
Michaela Donaghy, Denise McKeegan, Josh Walker, Rebecca Jones, Conor McComish, Sarah Meekin, Nick Magee
{"title":"在贝尔法斯特市医院跟进COVID-19。","authors":"Michaela Donaghy,&nbsp;Denise McKeegan,&nbsp;Josh Walker,&nbsp;Rebecca Jones,&nbsp;Conor McComish,&nbsp;Sarah Meekin,&nbsp;Nick Magee","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic of Spring 2020, Belfast City Hospital functioned as Belfast's Nightingale facility. Evidence published during this time focused mainly on the acute management of the condition. Guidance on follow up and long-term management for patients recovering from COVID-19 was sparse. A specialist COVID-19 follow up service was devised in Belfast City Hospital led by a respiratory physician with physiotherapy and psychology input.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected on all patients admitted to Belfast Nightingale unit. Patients admitted to Intensive Care at any stage in their admission were followed up separately by Intensive Care. Initial consultation was via telephone call for all eligible patients six weeks post discharge, followed by face-to-face consultation for those with symptoms at next available appointment, and a further face-to-face consultation at twelve weeks post hospital discharge. Patients were seen by respiratory physician, physiotherapy and psychology at each appointment. All patients who had initial changes on chest radiograph had 12 week follow up radiograph requested as per British Thoracic Society guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>29 patients were followed up after hospitalisation with COVID-19. Of these, 10 were brought for face-to-face consultations. Patients at clinic were all functionally independent with a median Medical Research Council dyspnoea score of 2 and a subjective assessment of their current health of median 50, on a visual analogue scale 0-100. Fatigue was common with all patients. Depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder were all reported from psychological review. Chest radiograph showed signs of improvement in 100% of clinic attendees. 90% of patients seen in clinic had normal or chronic obstructive patterns on spirometry, with one patient having a reduced transfer factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Majority of patients did not require face-to-face review and were recovering well. Of the 10 patients seen in the respiratory led clinic, the main issues reported were fatigue and psychological issues. Respiratory symptoms were significantly improving in 9 out of the 10 patients seen. All patients have been introduced to psychology service whilst at clinic and will continue to receive necessary support.</p>","PeriodicalId":38815,"journal":{"name":"Ulster Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/fc/umj-90-03-157.PMC8581698.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Follow up for COVID-19 in Belfast City Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Donaghy,&nbsp;Denise McKeegan,&nbsp;Josh Walker,&nbsp;Rebecca Jones,&nbsp;Conor McComish,&nbsp;Sarah Meekin,&nbsp;Nick Magee\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic of Spring 2020, Belfast City Hospital functioned as Belfast's Nightingale facility. Evidence published during this time focused mainly on the acute management of the condition. Guidance on follow up and long-term management for patients recovering from COVID-19 was sparse. A specialist COVID-19 follow up service was devised in Belfast City Hospital led by a respiratory physician with physiotherapy and psychology input.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected on all patients admitted to Belfast Nightingale unit. Patients admitted to Intensive Care at any stage in their admission were followed up separately by Intensive Care. Initial consultation was via telephone call for all eligible patients six weeks post discharge, followed by face-to-face consultation for those with symptoms at next available appointment, and a further face-to-face consultation at twelve weeks post hospital discharge. Patients were seen by respiratory physician, physiotherapy and psychology at each appointment. All patients who had initial changes on chest radiograph had 12 week follow up radiograph requested as per British Thoracic Society guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>29 patients were followed up after hospitalisation with COVID-19. Of these, 10 were brought for face-to-face consultations. Patients at clinic were all functionally independent with a median Medical Research Council dyspnoea score of 2 and a subjective assessment of their current health of median 50, on a visual analogue scale 0-100. Fatigue was common with all patients. Depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder were all reported from psychological review. Chest radiograph showed signs of improvement in 100% of clinic attendees. 90% of patients seen in clinic had normal or chronic obstructive patterns on spirometry, with one patient having a reduced transfer factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Majority of patients did not require face-to-face review and were recovering well. Of the 10 patients seen in the respiratory led clinic, the main issues reported were fatigue and psychological issues. Respiratory symptoms were significantly improving in 9 out of the 10 patients seen. All patients have been introduced to psychology service whilst at clinic and will continue to receive necessary support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulster Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/fc/umj-90-03-157.PMC8581698.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulster Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulster Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在2020年春季COVID-19大流行期间,贝尔法斯特市医院担任贝尔法斯特南丁格尔医院的职能。在此期间发表的证据主要集中在病情的急性管理上。关于COVID-19恢复期患者随访和长期管理的指导很少。贝尔法斯特市医院设计了一项专门的COVID-19随访服务,由一名呼吸内科医生领导,并提供物理治疗和心理学方面的意见。方法:收集贝尔法斯特南丁格尔病房收治的所有患者的数据。在入院的任何阶段入住重症监护室的患者分别由重症监护室随访。所有符合条件的患者在出院后6周通过电话进行初步咨询,随后在下次预约时对有症状的患者进行面对面咨询,并在出院后12周进行进一步的面对面咨询。患者每次就诊均由呼吸内科医生、物理治疗和心理医生诊治。所有在胸片上有初始变化的患者都按照英国胸科学会指南要求进行了12周的随访。结果:29例新冠肺炎住院后随访。其中10人被带去进行面对面磋商。门诊患者均功能独立,医学研究委员会呼吸困难评分中位数为2分,目前健康状况主观评估中位数为50分,视觉模拟评分为0-100分。所有患者均出现疲劳。抑郁、焦虑和创伤后应激障碍均来自心理回顾。胸片显示100%的临床参与者有改善的迹象。90%的临床患者肺活量测量显示为正常或慢性阻塞性,其中1例患者转移因子降低。结论:大多数患者不需要面对面复查,且恢复良好。在以呼吸为主导的诊所就诊的10名患者中,报告的主要问题是疲劳和心理问题。10名患者中有9名呼吸道症状明显改善。所有的病人在诊所都接受了心理服务,并将继续得到必要的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Follow up for COVID-19 in Belfast City Hospital.

Follow up for COVID-19 in Belfast City Hospital.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic of Spring 2020, Belfast City Hospital functioned as Belfast's Nightingale facility. Evidence published during this time focused mainly on the acute management of the condition. Guidance on follow up and long-term management for patients recovering from COVID-19 was sparse. A specialist COVID-19 follow up service was devised in Belfast City Hospital led by a respiratory physician with physiotherapy and psychology input.

Methods: Data was collected on all patients admitted to Belfast Nightingale unit. Patients admitted to Intensive Care at any stage in their admission were followed up separately by Intensive Care. Initial consultation was via telephone call for all eligible patients six weeks post discharge, followed by face-to-face consultation for those with symptoms at next available appointment, and a further face-to-face consultation at twelve weeks post hospital discharge. Patients were seen by respiratory physician, physiotherapy and psychology at each appointment. All patients who had initial changes on chest radiograph had 12 week follow up radiograph requested as per British Thoracic Society guidelines.

Results: 29 patients were followed up after hospitalisation with COVID-19. Of these, 10 were brought for face-to-face consultations. Patients at clinic were all functionally independent with a median Medical Research Council dyspnoea score of 2 and a subjective assessment of their current health of median 50, on a visual analogue scale 0-100. Fatigue was common with all patients. Depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder were all reported from psychological review. Chest radiograph showed signs of improvement in 100% of clinic attendees. 90% of patients seen in clinic had normal or chronic obstructive patterns on spirometry, with one patient having a reduced transfer factor.

Conclusion: Majority of patients did not require face-to-face review and were recovering well. Of the 10 patients seen in the respiratory led clinic, the main issues reported were fatigue and psychological issues. Respiratory symptoms were significantly improving in 9 out of the 10 patients seen. All patients have been introduced to psychology service whilst at clinic and will continue to receive necessary support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ulster Medical Journal
Ulster Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信