房颤筛查在社区和初级护理机构:范围审查。

Q3 Medicine
Journal of atrial fibrillation Pub Date : 2021-02-28 eCollection Date: 2021-02-01 DOI:10.4022/jafib.2452
Emma Canty, Claire MacGilchrist, Wael Tawfick, Caroline McIntosh
{"title":"房颤筛查在社区和初级护理机构:范围审查。","authors":"Emma Canty,&nbsp;Claire MacGilchrist,&nbsp;Wael Tawfick,&nbsp;Caroline McIntosh","doi":"10.4022/jafib.2452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common tachyarrhythmia and is associated with increased risk of stroke, morbidity and mortality. AF is responsible for up to a quarter of all strokes and is often asymptomatic until a stroke occurs.Screening for AF is a valuable approach to reduce the burden of stroke in the population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The motivation for this review was to synthesise and appraise the evidence for screening for AF in the community. The aims of this scoping review are 1). To describe the prevalence of newly diagnosed AF in screening programmes 2). Identify which techniques/ tools are employed for AF screening 3). To describe the setting and personnel involved in screening for AF.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>All forms of AF screening in adults (≥18 years) in primary and community care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine papers were included; most were cross-sectional studies (n=41) and RCTs (n=7). Prevalence of AF ranged from 0-34.5%. Screening tools and techniquesincluded the 12-lead ECG (n=33), the 1-lead ECG smartphone based Alivecor® (n=14) and pulse palpation (n=12). Studies were undertaken in community settings (n=30) or in urban/rural primary care (n=28). Personnel collecting research data were in the main members of the research team (n=31), GPs (n=16), practice nurses (n=10), participants (n=8) and pharmacists (n=4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prevalence of AF increased with advancing age. AF screening should target individuals at greatest risk of the condition including older adults≥65 years of age. Emerging novel technologies may increase the accessibility of AF screening in community and home settings. There is a need for high quality research to investigate AF prevalence and establish accuracy and validity for traditional versus novel screening tools used to screen for AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":15072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","volume":" ","pages":"2452"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691352/pdf/jafib-13-02452.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Community and Primary CareSettings: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Canty,&nbsp;Claire MacGilchrist,&nbsp;Wael Tawfick,&nbsp;Caroline McIntosh\",\"doi\":\"10.4022/jafib.2452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common tachyarrhythmia and is associated with increased risk of stroke, morbidity and mortality. AF is responsible for up to a quarter of all strokes and is often asymptomatic until a stroke occurs.Screening for AF is a valuable approach to reduce the burden of stroke in the population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The motivation for this review was to synthesise and appraise the evidence for screening for AF in the community. The aims of this scoping review are 1). To describe the prevalence of newly diagnosed AF in screening programmes 2). Identify which techniques/ tools are employed for AF screening 3). To describe the setting and personnel involved in screening for AF.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>All forms of AF screening in adults (≥18 years) in primary and community care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine papers were included; most were cross-sectional studies (n=41) and RCTs (n=7). Prevalence of AF ranged from 0-34.5%. Screening tools and techniquesincluded the 12-lead ECG (n=33), the 1-lead ECG smartphone based Alivecor® (n=14) and pulse palpation (n=12). Studies were undertaken in community settings (n=30) or in urban/rural primary care (n=28). Personnel collecting research data were in the main members of the research team (n=31), GPs (n=16), practice nurses (n=10), participants (n=8) and pharmacists (n=4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prevalence of AF increased with advancing age. AF screening should target individuals at greatest risk of the condition including older adults≥65 years of age. Emerging novel technologies may increase the accessibility of AF screening in community and home settings. There is a need for high quality research to investigate AF prevalence and establish accuracy and validity for traditional versus novel screening tools used to screen for AF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of atrial fibrillation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691352/pdf/jafib-13-02452.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of atrial fibrillation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.2452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.2452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:心房颤动(AF)是最常见的心动过速,与卒中、发病率和死亡率增加相关。高达四分之一的中风是由房颤引起的,在中风发生之前通常是无症状的。房颤筛查是减少人群卒中负担的一种有价值的方法。目的:本综述的动机是综合和评价社区中房颤筛查的证据。本综述的目的是:1)描述筛查方案中新诊断房颤的患病率2)确定用于房颤筛查的技术/工具3)描述房颤筛查的环境和人员。资格标准:在初级和社区护理机构中对成人(≥18岁)进行所有形式的房颤筛查。方法:本综述按照系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行。结果:共纳入59篇论文;大多数是横断面研究(n=41)和随机对照试验(n=7)。房颤患病率在0-34.5%之间。筛查工具和技术包括12导联心电图(n=33)、基于Alivecor®智能手机的1导联心电图(n=14)和脉搏触诊(n=12)。研究在社区环境(n=30)或城市/农村初级保健(n=28)中进行。收集研究资料的人员包括:研究小组主要成员(n=31)、全科医生(n=16)、执业护士(n=10)、参与者(n=8)和药师(n=4)。结论:AF患病率随年龄增长而增加。房颤筛查应针对高危人群,包括≥65岁的老年人。新兴的新技术可能会增加社区和家庭中房颤筛查的可及性。需要进行高质量的研究来调查房颤的患病率,并确定用于筛查房颤的传统筛查工具与新型筛查工具的准确性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Community and Primary CareSettings: A Scoping Review.

Background: Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common tachyarrhythmia and is associated with increased risk of stroke, morbidity and mortality. AF is responsible for up to a quarter of all strokes and is often asymptomatic until a stroke occurs.Screening for AF is a valuable approach to reduce the burden of stroke in the population.

Objectives: The motivation for this review was to synthesise and appraise the evidence for screening for AF in the community. The aims of this scoping review are 1). To describe the prevalence of newly diagnosed AF in screening programmes 2). Identify which techniques/ tools are employed for AF screening 3). To describe the setting and personnel involved in screening for AF.

Eligibility criteria: All forms of AF screening in adults (≥18 years) in primary and community care settings.

Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

Results: Fifty-nine papers were included; most were cross-sectional studies (n=41) and RCTs (n=7). Prevalence of AF ranged from 0-34.5%. Screening tools and techniquesincluded the 12-lead ECG (n=33), the 1-lead ECG smartphone based Alivecor® (n=14) and pulse palpation (n=12). Studies were undertaken in community settings (n=30) or in urban/rural primary care (n=28). Personnel collecting research data were in the main members of the research team (n=31), GPs (n=16), practice nurses (n=10), participants (n=8) and pharmacists (n=4).

Conclusion: Prevalence of AF increased with advancing age. AF screening should target individuals at greatest risk of the condition including older adults≥65 years of age. Emerging novel technologies may increase the accessibility of AF screening in community and home settings. There is a need for high quality research to investigate AF prevalence and establish accuracy and validity for traditional versus novel screening tools used to screen for AF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of atrial fibrillation
Journal of atrial fibrillation Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信