Justyna Rzucidlo, Priya Panday, Marissa Lombardo, Eric H Shulman, David S Park, Scott A Bernstein, Lior Jankelson, Douglas Holmes, Anthony Aizer, Larry A Chinitz, Chirag R Barbhaiya
{"title":"左房容积指数升高预测典型右房扑动消融后房颤的发生。","authors":"Justyna Rzucidlo, Priya Panday, Marissa Lombardo, Eric H Shulman, David S Park, Scott A Bernstein, Lior Jankelson, Douglas Holmes, Anthony Aizer, Larry A Chinitz, Chirag R Barbhaiya","doi":"10.4022/jafib.20200485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Incident atrial fibrillation (AF) is common after cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. Risk factors for the development of AF post ablation are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to identify patients undergoing CTI ablation for AFL most likely to develop AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review identified 114 consecutive patients without a history of AF or prior cardiac surgery who underwent typical CTI dependent AFL ablation between December 2013 to November 2018, who also had a complete preoperative transthoracic echocardiogram, and at least 1 year of follow-up at our medical center. We evaluated baseline characteristics, electrophysiology study (EPS) data and echocardiographic data for incidence of AF within 3 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Incident AF was identified in 46 patients (40%) during 600 + 405 days follow-up. Left atrial volume index (LAVI) was significantly greater in patients who developed AF compared to those that did not (37 ± 12.2 ml/m<sup>2</sup> vs 30 ± 13.4 ml/m<sup>2</sup>, p=.004), with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve based on the LAVI of 0.7 (p = 0.004). Kaplan-Meier estimated incidence of AF was significantly greater in patients with LAVI ≥ 30 ml/m<sup>2</sup> than LAVI < 30 ml/m<sup>2</sup> (66% vs 27%, p=0.004). Risk of incident AF in patients with LAVI > 40 mL/m2 was similar to that of LAVI 30-40 ml/m2 (67% vs 63%, respectively, p=0.97). In multivariable analysis LAVI remained the sole independent predictor of incidence AF after CTI AFL ablation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LAVI ≥ 30 ml/m<sup>2</sup> is associated with significantly increased risk of incident AF following CTI ablation for typical AFL. HATCH <2 was notably not an independent predictor of AF after AFL ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","volume":"14 1","pages":"20200485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691319/pdf/jafib-14-20200485.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elevated Left Atrial Volume Index Predicts Incident Atrial Fibrillation After Typical Right Atrial Flutter Ablation.\",\"authors\":\"Justyna Rzucidlo, Priya Panday, Marissa Lombardo, Eric H Shulman, David S Park, Scott A Bernstein, Lior Jankelson, Douglas Holmes, Anthony Aizer, Larry A Chinitz, Chirag R Barbhaiya\",\"doi\":\"10.4022/jafib.20200485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Incident atrial fibrillation (AF) is common after cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. Risk factors for the development of AF post ablation are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to identify patients undergoing CTI ablation for AFL most likely to develop AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review identified 114 consecutive patients without a history of AF or prior cardiac surgery who underwent typical CTI dependent AFL ablation between December 2013 to November 2018, who also had a complete preoperative transthoracic echocardiogram, and at least 1 year of follow-up at our medical center. We evaluated baseline characteristics, electrophysiology study (EPS) data and echocardiographic data for incidence of AF within 3 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Incident AF was identified in 46 patients (40%) during 600 + 405 days follow-up. Left atrial volume index (LAVI) was significantly greater in patients who developed AF compared to those that did not (37 ± 12.2 ml/m<sup>2</sup> vs 30 ± 13.4 ml/m<sup>2</sup>, p=.004), with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve based on the LAVI of 0.7 (p = 0.004). Kaplan-Meier estimated incidence of AF was significantly greater in patients with LAVI ≥ 30 ml/m<sup>2</sup> than LAVI < 30 ml/m<sup>2</sup> (66% vs 27%, p=0.004). Risk of incident AF in patients with LAVI > 40 mL/m2 was similar to that of LAVI 30-40 ml/m2 (67% vs 63%, respectively, p=0.97). In multivariable analysis LAVI remained the sole independent predictor of incidence AF after CTI AFL ablation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LAVI ≥ 30 ml/m<sup>2</sup> is associated with significantly increased risk of incident AF following CTI ablation for typical AFL. HATCH <2 was notably not an independent predictor of AF after AFL ablation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of atrial fibrillation\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"20200485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691319/pdf/jafib-14-20200485.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of atrial fibrillation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.20200485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.20200485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:心房颤动(AF)的发生是常见的后心室三尖瓣峡(CTI)依赖性心房扑动(AFL)消融。消融后房颤发生的危险因素尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定接受CTI消融治疗AFL的患者最有可能发展为AF。方法:回顾性图表回顾确定了114例无房颤病史或既往心脏手术的患者,这些患者在2013年12月至2018年11月期间接受了典型的CTI依赖性AFL消融,并进行了完整的术前经胸超声心动图检查,并在我们的医疗中心随访至少1年。我们评估了基线特征、电生理研究(EPS)数据和超声心动图数据,以确定3年内房颤的发生率。结果:在600 + 405天的随访中,46例(40%)患者发现了AF。发生房颤的患者左房容积指数(LAVI)明显高于未发生房颤的患者(37±12.2 ml/m2 vs 30±13.4 ml/m2, p= 0.004),基于LAVI的受试者操作者特征曲线下面积为0.7 (p = 0.004)。Kaplan-Meier估计,LAVI≥30 ml/m2的患者AF的发生率显著高于LAVI < 30 ml/m2的患者(66% vs 27%, p=0.004)。LAVI > 40 mL/m2的患者发生AF的风险与LAVI 30-40 mL/m2的患者相似(分别为67% vs 63%, p=0.97)。在多变量分析中,LAVI仍然是CTI AFL消融后AF发生率的唯一独立预测因子。结论:LAVI≥30 ml/m2与典型AFL CTI消融后发生AF的风险显著增加相关。孵化
Elevated Left Atrial Volume Index Predicts Incident Atrial Fibrillation After Typical Right Atrial Flutter Ablation.
Purpose: Incident atrial fibrillation (AF) is common after cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. Risk factors for the development of AF post ablation are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to identify patients undergoing CTI ablation for AFL most likely to develop AF.
Methods: Retrospective chart review identified 114 consecutive patients without a history of AF or prior cardiac surgery who underwent typical CTI dependent AFL ablation between December 2013 to November 2018, who also had a complete preoperative transthoracic echocardiogram, and at least 1 year of follow-up at our medical center. We evaluated baseline characteristics, electrophysiology study (EPS) data and echocardiographic data for incidence of AF within 3 years.
Results: Incident AF was identified in 46 patients (40%) during 600 + 405 days follow-up. Left atrial volume index (LAVI) was significantly greater in patients who developed AF compared to those that did not (37 ± 12.2 ml/m2 vs 30 ± 13.4 ml/m2, p=.004), with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve based on the LAVI of 0.7 (p = 0.004). Kaplan-Meier estimated incidence of AF was significantly greater in patients with LAVI ≥ 30 ml/m2 than LAVI < 30 ml/m2 (66% vs 27%, p=0.004). Risk of incident AF in patients with LAVI > 40 mL/m2 was similar to that of LAVI 30-40 ml/m2 (67% vs 63%, respectively, p=0.97). In multivariable analysis LAVI remained the sole independent predictor of incidence AF after CTI AFL ablation.
Conclusions: LAVI ≥ 30 ml/m2 is associated with significantly increased risk of incident AF following CTI ablation for typical AFL. HATCH <2 was notably not an independent predictor of AF after AFL ablation.