Primary central nervous system lymphoma in older adults and the rationale for maintenance strategies: a narrative review.

Objective: To provide a summary and analysis of the evidence for various agents applied as maintenance therapy and highlight ongoing trials or trials in development that evaluate the efficacy of maintenance therapy strategies in older patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

Background: PCNSL are rare neoplasms that can have an aggressive course with short-lived remissions when compared to systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). There is currently a paucity of evidence on treatment in older adults with PCNSL, who may be unfit to tolerate effective therapies for PCNSL. Those who can tolerate these therapies and survive PCNSL are at increased risk from developing treatment-related toxicity, functional decline, and debilitating neurotoxicity. While there is no clearly defined role for maintenance therapy after treatment of systemic DLBCL, it should be considered in PCNSL because central nervous system (CNS) recurrence often has a devastating and irreversible impact on neurologic function. Therefore, at least theoretically, use of effective maintenance therapy in older adults with PCNSL, either in lieu of consolidation or after consolidation therapy, may be better tolerated and help delay tumor progression, resulting in an improved overall global neurologic function and quality of life.

Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE (via PubMed) for all studies of drug treatments for maintenance therapy in PCNSL and also relied on expert opinion. We provide a summary and analysis of the evidence for various maintenance therapy agents, including methotrexate, rituximab, lenalidomide, temozolomide, ibrutinib, and procarbazine. We also highlight ongoing trials or trials in development that evaluate the efficacy of maintenance therapy in PCNSL.

Conclusions: Prospective clinical studies focusing on PCNSL patients who are not candidates for intensive post-induction therapy are scarce. To date, there are no studies that clarify whether maintenance therapy can be used in lieu of consolidation therapy with autologous stem cell transplant or radiation. Prospective studies may provide critical data regarding the identification of optimal agents, whether consolidation therapy could be replaced by maintenance therapy, and the overall role of maintenance therapy as a means to potentially improve survival and preserve quality of life and function in a vulnerable, older patient population.