全麻与中度镇静:影响护理人员决定儿童牙科治疗方式的因素。

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN Pub Date : 2021-09-15
David Avenetti, Helen H Lee, Nisha Mehta, Sheela Raja, Charles LeHew
{"title":"全麻与中度镇静:影响护理人员决定儿童牙科治疗方式的因素。","authors":"David Avenetti,&nbsp;Helen H Lee,&nbsp;Nisha Mehta,&nbsp;Sheela Raja,&nbsp;Charles LeHew","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Treatment for early childhood caries may include advanced behavior management modalities, such as moderate sedation (MS) or general anesthesia (GA). The purpose of this study was to determine which factors are important to parents when considering MS or GA for their child.<br/> <b>Methods:</b> Parents completed a cross-sectional survey to determine which factors they considered in their decision between MS or GA for dental treatment. The relative importance of social, financial, and patient-level factors, the importance of dentists' recommendations, and the reported knowledge levels and sources of information regarding treatment modality were also assessed.<br/> <b>Results:</b> The majority of 130 parents surveyed reported at least a moderate amount of knowledge about GA and MS. Although most identified their dentist as the primary source of information (45 percent for GA, 51 percent for MS), many reported having no source of information about either (23 percent for GA, 16 percent for MS). For both groups, the dentist's recommendation for MS or GA was more influential than cost, risk profile, and the number of missed work and school days (<i>P</i> <0.001). Being well-informed about the treatment modality was more influential than the dentist's recommendation only for the parents who chose MS (<i>P</i> <0.001).<br/> <b>Conclusion:</b> Parents' self-reported knowledge regarding their treatment modality was relatively low. The choice of treatment modality for pediatric dental care relied mostly on the dentist's recommendation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51605,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General Anesthesia Versus Moderate Sedation: Factors Affecting Caregivers' Decisions for Children's Dental Treatment Modality.\",\"authors\":\"David Avenetti,&nbsp;Helen H Lee,&nbsp;Nisha Mehta,&nbsp;Sheela Raja,&nbsp;Charles LeHew\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Treatment for early childhood caries may include advanced behavior management modalities, such as moderate sedation (MS) or general anesthesia (GA). The purpose of this study was to determine which factors are important to parents when considering MS or GA for their child.<br/> <b>Methods:</b> Parents completed a cross-sectional survey to determine which factors they considered in their decision between MS or GA for dental treatment. The relative importance of social, financial, and patient-level factors, the importance of dentists' recommendations, and the reported knowledge levels and sources of information regarding treatment modality were also assessed.<br/> <b>Results:</b> The majority of 130 parents surveyed reported at least a moderate amount of knowledge about GA and MS. Although most identified their dentist as the primary source of information (45 percent for GA, 51 percent for MS), many reported having no source of information about either (23 percent for GA, 16 percent for MS). For both groups, the dentist's recommendation for MS or GA was more influential than cost, risk profile, and the number of missed work and school days (<i>P</i> <0.001). Being well-informed about the treatment modality was more influential than the dentist's recommendation only for the parents who chose MS (<i>P</i> <0.001).<br/> <b>Conclusion:</b> Parents' self-reported knowledge regarding their treatment modality was relatively low. The choice of treatment modality for pediatric dental care relied mostly on the dentist's recommendation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:早期儿童龋齿的治疗可能包括高级行为管理模式,如中度镇静(MS)或全身麻醉(GA)。本研究的目的是确定哪些因素对父母在考虑孩子是否患有多发性硬化症或GA时是重要的。方法:家长完成一项横断面调查,以确定他们在决定MS或GA牙科治疗时考虑的因素。还评估了社会、经济和患者水平因素的相对重要性,牙医建议的重要性,以及报告的关于治疗方式的知识水平和信息来源。结果:在接受调查的130名家长中,大多数人至少对GA和MS有一定程度的了解,尽管大多数人认为他们的牙医是主要的信息来源(GA占45%,MS占51%),但许多人报告没有任何信息来源(GA占23%,MS占16%)。对于两组,牙医对MS或GA的建议比费用、风险概况、缺勤和上学天数的影响更大(P P结论:父母对其治疗方式的自我报告知识相对较低。儿童牙科护理治疗方式的选择主要取决于牙医的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
General Anesthesia Versus Moderate Sedation: Factors Affecting Caregivers' Decisions for Children's Dental Treatment Modality.

Purpose: Treatment for early childhood caries may include advanced behavior management modalities, such as moderate sedation (MS) or general anesthesia (GA). The purpose of this study was to determine which factors are important to parents when considering MS or GA for their child.
Methods: Parents completed a cross-sectional survey to determine which factors they considered in their decision between MS or GA for dental treatment. The relative importance of social, financial, and patient-level factors, the importance of dentists' recommendations, and the reported knowledge levels and sources of information regarding treatment modality were also assessed.
Results: The majority of 130 parents surveyed reported at least a moderate amount of knowledge about GA and MS. Although most identified their dentist as the primary source of information (45 percent for GA, 51 percent for MS), many reported having no source of information about either (23 percent for GA, 16 percent for MS). For both groups, the dentist's recommendation for MS or GA was more influential than cost, risk profile, and the number of missed work and school days (P <0.001). Being well-informed about the treatment modality was more influential than the dentist's recommendation only for the parents who chose MS (P <0.001).
Conclusion: Parents' self-reported knowledge regarding their treatment modality was relatively low. The choice of treatment modality for pediatric dental care relied mostly on the dentist's recommendation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Acquired after the merger between the American Society of Dentistry for Children and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry in 2002, the Journal of Dentistry for Children (JDC) is an internationally renowned journal whose publishing dates back to 1934. Published three times a year, JDC promotes the practice, education and research specifically related to the specialty of pediatric dentistry. It covers a wide range of topics related to the clinical care of children, from clinical techniques of daily importance to the practitioner, to studies on child behavior and growth and development. JDC also provides information on the physical, psychological and emotional conditions of children as they relate to and affect their dental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信