高血压管理中的舒张压 J 曲线:心血管疾病的关联与风险。

IF 1.5 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Integrated Blood Pressure Control Pub Date : 2021-12-14 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IBPC.S286957
Brian Gaffney, Alan P Jacobsen, Abhishek W Pallippattu, Niall Leahy, John W McEvoy
{"title":"高血压管理中的舒张压 J 曲线:心血管疾病的关联与风险。","authors":"Brian Gaffney, Alan P Jacobsen, Abhishek W Pallippattu, Niall Leahy, John W McEvoy","doi":"10.2147/IBPC.S286957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The treatment of hypertension has changed dramatically over the last century, with recent trials informing clinical guidelines that recommend aiming for lower blood pressure (BP) targets than ever before. However, a \"J\"- or \"U-shaped curve\" in the association between diastolic BP and cardiovascular events has been observed in epidemiological studies, suggesting that both high diastolic BPs and diastolic BPs below a certain nadir are associated with higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Despite the potential for confounding and reverse causation, this association may caution against overly intensive BP lowering in some hypertensive adults who also have a low baseline diastolic BP.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent post-hoc analyses of the landmark Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) appear to contradict these J-curve concerns, finding that the benefit of more intensive BP treatment did not differ based on baseline blood pressure. Similarly, sensitivity analyses of The Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) randomized controlled trial found that patients experienced similar benefits from an intensive BP goal, regardless of whether their diastolic BP was above or below 60 mm Hg. Finally, several Mendelian randomization analyses, which are less susceptible to confounding and reverse causation, demonstrated a clear linear relationship between diastolic BP and cardiovascular events. These studies indicate that a potential reduction in CVD risk is possible, irrespective of baseline diastolic BP values.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Sufficient recent evidence indicates that low diastolic BP is not causal of worse cardiovascular outcomes but rather represents confounding or reverse causation. Therefore, while low diastolic BP can be considered a marker of CVD risk, this risk is not expected to increase with further BP lowering when necessary to control concomitant elevations of systolic BP. Indeed, BP reduction in this setting appears beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":45299,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Blood Pressure Control","volume":"14 ","pages":"179-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/ed/ibpc-14-179.PMC8685549.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diastolic Blood Pressure J-Curve in Hypertension Management: Links and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Gaffney, Alan P Jacobsen, Abhishek W Pallippattu, Niall Leahy, John W McEvoy\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IBPC.S286957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The treatment of hypertension has changed dramatically over the last century, with recent trials informing clinical guidelines that recommend aiming for lower blood pressure (BP) targets than ever before. However, a \\\"J\\\"- or \\\"U-shaped curve\\\" in the association between diastolic BP and cardiovascular events has been observed in epidemiological studies, suggesting that both high diastolic BPs and diastolic BPs below a certain nadir are associated with higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Despite the potential for confounding and reverse causation, this association may caution against overly intensive BP lowering in some hypertensive adults who also have a low baseline diastolic BP.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent post-hoc analyses of the landmark Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) appear to contradict these J-curve concerns, finding that the benefit of more intensive BP treatment did not differ based on baseline blood pressure. Similarly, sensitivity analyses of The Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) randomized controlled trial found that patients experienced similar benefits from an intensive BP goal, regardless of whether their diastolic BP was above or below 60 mm Hg. Finally, several Mendelian randomization analyses, which are less susceptible to confounding and reverse causation, demonstrated a clear linear relationship between diastolic BP and cardiovascular events. These studies indicate that a potential reduction in CVD risk is possible, irrespective of baseline diastolic BP values.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Sufficient recent evidence indicates that low diastolic BP is not causal of worse cardiovascular outcomes but rather represents confounding or reverse causation. Therefore, while low diastolic BP can be considered a marker of CVD risk, this risk is not expected to increase with further BP lowering when necessary to control concomitant elevations of systolic BP. Indeed, BP reduction in this setting appears beneficial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrated Blood Pressure Control\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"179-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/ed/ibpc-14-179.PMC8685549.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrated Blood Pressure Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IBPC.S286957\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Blood Pressure Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IBPC.S286957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:高血压的治疗在上个世纪发生了巨大变化,最近的试验为临床指南提供了依据,指南建议将目标血压(BP)定得比以往任何时候都低。然而,在流行病学研究中观察到,舒张压与心血管事件之间的关系呈 "J "形或 "U "形曲线,表明舒张压过高和舒张压低于某一最低点都与心血管疾病(CVD)事件的风险较高有关。尽管存在混淆和反向因果关系的可能性,但这种关联可能提醒人们,对于一些舒张压基线也较低的高血压成人,不要过度强化降压治疗:最近对具有里程碑意义的收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)进行的事后分析似乎与这些 J 型曲线的担忧相矛盾,分析发现,根据基线血压的不同,强化降压治疗的益处也不尽相同。同样,"老年高血压患者血压干预策略"(STEP)随机对照试验的敏感性分析也发现,无论患者的舒张压是高于还是低于 60 毫米汞柱,都能从强化降压目标中获得类似的益处。最后,几项不易受混杂因素和反向因果关系影响的孟德尔随机分析表明,舒张压与心血管事件之间存在明显的线性关系。这些研究表明,无论舒张压基线值如何,都有可能降低心血管疾病风险。小结:最近有足够的证据表明,舒张压过低并不是心血管疾病恶化的因果关系,而是混杂或反向因果关系。因此,尽管舒张压过低可被视为心血管疾病风险的一个标志,但在必要时进一步降低血压以控制同时出现的收缩压升高,预计这种风险不会增加。事实上,在这种情况下降低血压似乎是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Diastolic Blood Pressure J-Curve in Hypertension Management: Links and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.

The Diastolic Blood Pressure J-Curve in Hypertension Management: Links and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.

The Diastolic Blood Pressure J-Curve in Hypertension Management: Links and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.

Purpose of review: The treatment of hypertension has changed dramatically over the last century, with recent trials informing clinical guidelines that recommend aiming for lower blood pressure (BP) targets than ever before. However, a "J"- or "U-shaped curve" in the association between diastolic BP and cardiovascular events has been observed in epidemiological studies, suggesting that both high diastolic BPs and diastolic BPs below a certain nadir are associated with higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Despite the potential for confounding and reverse causation, this association may caution against overly intensive BP lowering in some hypertensive adults who also have a low baseline diastolic BP.

Recent findings: Recent post-hoc analyses of the landmark Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) appear to contradict these J-curve concerns, finding that the benefit of more intensive BP treatment did not differ based on baseline blood pressure. Similarly, sensitivity analyses of The Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) randomized controlled trial found that patients experienced similar benefits from an intensive BP goal, regardless of whether their diastolic BP was above or below 60 mm Hg. Finally, several Mendelian randomization analyses, which are less susceptible to confounding and reverse causation, demonstrated a clear linear relationship between diastolic BP and cardiovascular events. These studies indicate that a potential reduction in CVD risk is possible, irrespective of baseline diastolic BP values.

Summary: Sufficient recent evidence indicates that low diastolic BP is not causal of worse cardiovascular outcomes but rather represents confounding or reverse causation. Therefore, while low diastolic BP can be considered a marker of CVD risk, this risk is not expected to increase with further BP lowering when necessary to control concomitant elevations of systolic BP. Indeed, BP reduction in this setting appears beneficial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrated Blood Pressure Control
Integrated Blood Pressure Control PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信