组织扩张腭成形术治疗腭咽功能不全。

Erin E Anstadt, Madeleine K Bruce, Matthew Ford, Noel Jabbour, Miles J Pfaff, Michael Bykowski, Jesse A Goldstein, Joseph E Losee
{"title":"组织扩张腭成形术治疗腭咽功能不全。","authors":"Erin E Anstadt,&nbsp;Madeleine K Bruce,&nbsp;Matthew Ford,&nbsp;Noel Jabbour,&nbsp;Miles J Pfaff,&nbsp;Michael Bykowski,&nbsp;Jesse A Goldstein,&nbsp;Joseph E Losee","doi":"10.1177/10556656211053761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) following primary palatoplasty remains a difficult problem to treat. This study evaluates speech outcomes following revision palatoplasty with tissue augmentation using buccal myomucosal flaps (BMF) as an alternative to pharyngoplasty for patients with VPI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center review of revision palatoplasty with tissue augmentation at a tertiary pediatric hospital Cleft-Craniofacial Center between January 2017 and March 2021 was conducted. Patients with a history of previous palatoplasty, a diagnosis of persistent or recurrent VPI, and comprehensive pre- and postoperative speech evaluations who underwent revision palatoplasty with BMF were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients met inclusion criteria (35% female, 20% syndromic). Mean age at the time of revision palatoplasty with BMF was 9.7 years. Preoperatively, all patients had stigmatizing speech and received the recommendation for speech surgery; the mean Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score (PWSS) was 14.3 ± 4.9. The mean postoperative PWSS at the most recent assessment was 4.2 ± 2.3, representing a statistically significant improvement from preoperative scores (<i>P </i>< .001). Mean follow-up time was 8.9 months. Following revision palatoplasty with BMF, only one patient has received the recommendation for further speech surgery. No complications were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with VPI following primary palatoplasty, revision palatoplasty with tissue augmentation offers an alternative to pharyngoplasty. This approach preserves dynamic velopharyngeal function, improves speech outcomes, and should be considered an option when treating patients with post-primary palatoplasty VPI.</p>","PeriodicalId":520794,"journal":{"name":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","volume":" ","pages":"1461-1468"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tissue Augmenting Palatoplasty for the Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency.\",\"authors\":\"Erin E Anstadt,&nbsp;Madeleine K Bruce,&nbsp;Matthew Ford,&nbsp;Noel Jabbour,&nbsp;Miles J Pfaff,&nbsp;Michael Bykowski,&nbsp;Jesse A Goldstein,&nbsp;Joseph E Losee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656211053761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) following primary palatoplasty remains a difficult problem to treat. This study evaluates speech outcomes following revision palatoplasty with tissue augmentation using buccal myomucosal flaps (BMF) as an alternative to pharyngoplasty for patients with VPI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center review of revision palatoplasty with tissue augmentation at a tertiary pediatric hospital Cleft-Craniofacial Center between January 2017 and March 2021 was conducted. Patients with a history of previous palatoplasty, a diagnosis of persistent or recurrent VPI, and comprehensive pre- and postoperative speech evaluations who underwent revision palatoplasty with BMF were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients met inclusion criteria (35% female, 20% syndromic). Mean age at the time of revision palatoplasty with BMF was 9.7 years. Preoperatively, all patients had stigmatizing speech and received the recommendation for speech surgery; the mean Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score (PWSS) was 14.3 ± 4.9. The mean postoperative PWSS at the most recent assessment was 4.2 ± 2.3, representing a statistically significant improvement from preoperative scores (<i>P </i>< .001). Mean follow-up time was 8.9 months. Following revision palatoplasty with BMF, only one patient has received the recommendation for further speech surgery. No complications were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with VPI following primary palatoplasty, revision palatoplasty with tissue augmentation offers an alternative to pharyngoplasty. This approach preserves dynamic velopharyngeal function, improves speech outcomes, and should be considered an option when treating patients with post-primary palatoplasty VPI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1461-1468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211053761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211053761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:初级腭成形术后持续性腭咽功能不全(VPI)仍然是一个难以治疗的问题。本研究评估了使用颊肌粘膜瓣(BMF)作为VPI患者咽成形术的替代方案后的翻修腭成形术的语言效果。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2021年3月在某三级儿科医院裂颅面中心进行的翻修腭成形术和组织隆胸的单中心研究。既往腭裂成形术史,诊断为持续性或复发性VPI,并接受BMF改良腭裂成形术的患者进行了全面的术前和术后言语评估。结果:20例患者符合纳入标准(女性占35%,综合征占20%)。采用BMF修复腭成形术时的平均年龄为9.7岁。术前所有患者均有言语污名化,建议行言语手术;平均匹兹堡加权语音评分(PWSS)为14.3±4.9。在最近一次评估中,术后平均PWSS为4.2±2.3,与术前评分相比有统计学上的显著改善(P结论:在初次腭成形术后的VPI患者中,翻修腭成形术结合组织增强提供了咽成形术的替代方案。这种方法保留动态腭咽功能,改善语言预后,在治疗初级腭成形术后VPI患者时应考虑一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tissue Augmenting Palatoplasty for the Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency.

Purpose: Persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) following primary palatoplasty remains a difficult problem to treat. This study evaluates speech outcomes following revision palatoplasty with tissue augmentation using buccal myomucosal flaps (BMF) as an alternative to pharyngoplasty for patients with VPI.

Methods: A retrospective single-center review of revision palatoplasty with tissue augmentation at a tertiary pediatric hospital Cleft-Craniofacial Center between January 2017 and March 2021 was conducted. Patients with a history of previous palatoplasty, a diagnosis of persistent or recurrent VPI, and comprehensive pre- and postoperative speech evaluations who underwent revision palatoplasty with BMF were included.

Results: Twenty patients met inclusion criteria (35% female, 20% syndromic). Mean age at the time of revision palatoplasty with BMF was 9.7 years. Preoperatively, all patients had stigmatizing speech and received the recommendation for speech surgery; the mean Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score (PWSS) was 14.3 ± 4.9. The mean postoperative PWSS at the most recent assessment was 4.2 ± 2.3, representing a statistically significant improvement from preoperative scores (P < .001). Mean follow-up time was 8.9 months. Following revision palatoplasty with BMF, only one patient has received the recommendation for further speech surgery. No complications were noted.

Conclusion: In patients with VPI following primary palatoplasty, revision palatoplasty with tissue augmentation offers an alternative to pharyngoplasty. This approach preserves dynamic velopharyngeal function, improves speech outcomes, and should be considered an option when treating patients with post-primary palatoplasty VPI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信