向癌症幸存者过渡的复原力。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Research in Human Development Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-02 DOI:10.1080/15427609.2021.1960771
Crystal L Park, Emily Fritzson, Katherine E Gnall, Caroline Salafia, Kaleigh Ligus, Sinead Sinnott, Keith M Bellizzi
{"title":"向癌症幸存者过渡的复原力。","authors":"Crystal L Park,&nbsp;Emily Fritzson,&nbsp;Katherine E Gnall,&nbsp;Caroline Salafia,&nbsp;Kaleigh Ligus,&nbsp;Sinead Sinnott,&nbsp;Keith M Bellizzi","doi":"10.1080/15427609.2021.1960771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resilience is highly relevant in the context of cancer, and understanding how survivors adapt and potentially thrive following their diagnosis and treatment may provide insights into better supports and interventions to promote healthier survivorship. In this paper, we characterize two different ways to conceptualize and study resilience in cancer survivorship, as a trait and as a process. We focus specifically on the transition from active treatment to post-treatment survivorship. We present data from 225 cancer patients transitioning from active treatment (baseline assessment) to early survivorship (6-month follow-up). Results demonstrate that resilience assessed as a trait at baseline was unrelated to changes in survivors' mental or physical wellbeing at follow-up, but did predict a <i>decline</i> in social satisfaction and spiritual wellbeing over time. However, when resilience is conceptualized as a dynamic process, the sample showed substantial resilience on multiple aspects of wellbeing. We suggest that different ways of conceptualizing resilience--as a trait versus as a dynamic process--may lead to very different conclusions and discuss future research directions for cancer survivors and for science of resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":47096,"journal":{"name":"Research in Human Development","volume":"18 3","pages":"197-211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675895/pdf/nihms-1733898.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilience across the Transition to Cancer Survivorship.\",\"authors\":\"Crystal L Park,&nbsp;Emily Fritzson,&nbsp;Katherine E Gnall,&nbsp;Caroline Salafia,&nbsp;Kaleigh Ligus,&nbsp;Sinead Sinnott,&nbsp;Keith M Bellizzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15427609.2021.1960771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Resilience is highly relevant in the context of cancer, and understanding how survivors adapt and potentially thrive following their diagnosis and treatment may provide insights into better supports and interventions to promote healthier survivorship. In this paper, we characterize two different ways to conceptualize and study resilience in cancer survivorship, as a trait and as a process. We focus specifically on the transition from active treatment to post-treatment survivorship. We present data from 225 cancer patients transitioning from active treatment (baseline assessment) to early survivorship (6-month follow-up). Results demonstrate that resilience assessed as a trait at baseline was unrelated to changes in survivors' mental or physical wellbeing at follow-up, but did predict a <i>decline</i> in social satisfaction and spiritual wellbeing over time. However, when resilience is conceptualized as a dynamic process, the sample showed substantial resilience on multiple aspects of wellbeing. We suggest that different ways of conceptualizing resilience--as a trait versus as a dynamic process--may lead to very different conclusions and discuss future research directions for cancer survivors and for science of resilience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Human Development\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"197-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675895/pdf/nihms-1733898.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2021.1960771\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2021.1960771","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在癌症的背景下,恢复力是高度相关的,了解幸存者在诊断和治疗后如何适应和潜在地茁壮成长,可能会提供更好的支持和干预措施,以促进更健康的幸存者。在本文中,我们描述了两种不同的方法来概念化和研究癌症生存中的恢复力,作为一种特征和一个过程。我们特别关注从积极治疗到治疗后生存的过渡。我们提供了225例从积极治疗(基线评估)过渡到早期生存(6个月随访)的癌症患者的数据。结果表明,恢复力在基线时被评估为一种特征,与幸存者在随访时的心理或身体健康变化无关,但确实预示着随着时间的推移,他们的社会满意度和精神健康水平会下降。然而,当弹性被定义为一个动态过程时,样本在幸福的多个方面显示出实质性的弹性。我们认为,将恢复力概念化的不同方式——作为一种特质还是作为一个动态过程——可能会得出截然不同的结论,并讨论癌症幸存者和恢复力科学的未来研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resilience across the Transition to Cancer Survivorship.

Resilience is highly relevant in the context of cancer, and understanding how survivors adapt and potentially thrive following their diagnosis and treatment may provide insights into better supports and interventions to promote healthier survivorship. In this paper, we characterize two different ways to conceptualize and study resilience in cancer survivorship, as a trait and as a process. We focus specifically on the transition from active treatment to post-treatment survivorship. We present data from 225 cancer patients transitioning from active treatment (baseline assessment) to early survivorship (6-month follow-up). Results demonstrate that resilience assessed as a trait at baseline was unrelated to changes in survivors' mental or physical wellbeing at follow-up, but did predict a decline in social satisfaction and spiritual wellbeing over time. However, when resilience is conceptualized as a dynamic process, the sample showed substantial resilience on multiple aspects of wellbeing. We suggest that different ways of conceptualizing resilience--as a trait versus as a dynamic process--may lead to very different conclusions and discuss future research directions for cancer survivors and for science of resilience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Human Development
Research in Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信