新冠肺炎大流行期间,在退伍军人事务医疗中心使用实时互动和存储转发远程皮肤病学及其影响。

Francine Castillo, Sara Peracca, Dennis H Oh, Amanda R Twigg
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行期间,在退伍军人事务医疗中心使用实时互动和存储转发远程皮肤病学及其影响。","authors":"Francine Castillo,&nbsp;Sara Peracca,&nbsp;Dennis H Oh,&nbsp;Amanda R Twigg","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2021.0275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Teledermatology has emerged as a promising method of continuing dermatologic care during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, including in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Analysis of the utilization and impact of teledermatology within the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System (SFVAHCS) may elucidate the ways that teledermatology programs can continue to be optimized. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective analysis of live interactive encounters, Veterans Affairs Video Connect (VVC), store-and-forward telehealth (SFT), and face-to-face (FTF) consultations, performed within the SFVAHCS from March 2020 to December 2020. To assess utilization, we analyzed numbers of encounters throughout 2020. To assess impact, we analyzed primary diagnoses for each encounter and rates of recommendations for medications and lesion biopsies. Additionally, we assessed diagnostic accuracy associated with each teledermatology type by measuring concordance between teledermatologists' clinical diagnoses and histopathological diagnoses. <b>Results:</b> Two thousand two hundred fifty FTF, 347 VVC, and 470 SFT encounters were conducted from March to December 2020. More female patients utilized VVC, and patients who utilized VVC were younger than SFT and FTF users (<i>p</i> < 0.01). SFT was utilized more by patients from rural areas (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Diagnoses addressed were significantly different between VVC and SFT. A majority of VVC encounters involved referrals for inflammatory conditions; primary diagnoses associated with SFT consultations were most frequently neoplasms. Comparison of VVC and SFT outcomes showed that more VVC visits resulted in a medication recommendation, while more SFT consultations resulted in a biopsy recommendation. <b>Conclusions:</b> Teledermatology contributed to meeting patient needs throughout 2020 and created an impact on clinical management. Patient characteristics, diagnoses, and type of impact associated with encounters varied between SFT and VVC. This analysis provides insight into teledermatology utilization within the VA system and can contribute to efforts to improve the quality of teledermatology care for veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"1186-1192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Utilization and Impact of Live Interactive and Store-and-Forward Teledermatology in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Francine Castillo,&nbsp;Sara Peracca,&nbsp;Dennis H Oh,&nbsp;Amanda R Twigg\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2021.0275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Teledermatology has emerged as a promising method of continuing dermatologic care during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, including in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Analysis of the utilization and impact of teledermatology within the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System (SFVAHCS) may elucidate the ways that teledermatology programs can continue to be optimized. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective analysis of live interactive encounters, Veterans Affairs Video Connect (VVC), store-and-forward telehealth (SFT), and face-to-face (FTF) consultations, performed within the SFVAHCS from March 2020 to December 2020. To assess utilization, we analyzed numbers of encounters throughout 2020. To assess impact, we analyzed primary diagnoses for each encounter and rates of recommendations for medications and lesion biopsies. Additionally, we assessed diagnostic accuracy associated with each teledermatology type by measuring concordance between teledermatologists' clinical diagnoses and histopathological diagnoses. <b>Results:</b> Two thousand two hundred fifty FTF, 347 VVC, and 470 SFT encounters were conducted from March to December 2020. More female patients utilized VVC, and patients who utilized VVC were younger than SFT and FTF users (<i>p</i> < 0.01). SFT was utilized more by patients from rural areas (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Diagnoses addressed were significantly different between VVC and SFT. A majority of VVC encounters involved referrals for inflammatory conditions; primary diagnoses associated with SFT consultations were most frequently neoplasms. Comparison of VVC and SFT outcomes showed that more VVC visits resulted in a medication recommendation, while more SFT consultations resulted in a biopsy recommendation. <b>Conclusions:</b> Teledermatology contributed to meeting patient needs throughout 2020 and created an impact on clinical management. Patient characteristics, diagnoses, and type of impact associated with encounters varied between SFT and VVC. This analysis provides insight into teledermatology utilization within the VA system and can contribute to efforts to improve the quality of teledermatology care for veterans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1186-1192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在2019冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行期间,远程皮肤病学已成为一种有前途的持续皮肤科护理方法,包括在退伍军人事务部(VA)。分析旧金山退伍军人事务医疗保健系统(SFVAHCS)中远程皮肤科的使用和影响,可以阐明远程皮肤科项目可以继续优化的方式。方法:我们对2020年3月至2020年12月在SFVAHCS内进行的现场互动就诊、退伍军人事务视频连接(VVC)、存储转发远程医疗(SFT)和面对面咨询(FTF)进行了回顾性分析。为了评估使用率,我们分析了整个2020年的遭遇次数。为了评估影响,我们分析了每次遭遇的初步诊断以及推荐药物和病变活检的比率。此外,我们通过测量远程皮肤科医生的临床诊断和组织病理学诊断之间的一致性来评估与每种远程皮肤科类型相关的诊断准确性。结果:2020年3月至12月进行了2,250例FTF, 347例VVC和470例SFT。使用VVC的女性患者多于使用SFT和FTF的患者,且使用VVC的患者年龄较轻(p < 0.01)。农村患者使用SFT的比例较高(p < 0.01)。VVC和SFT的诊断有显著性差异。大多数VVC接触涉及炎性条件的转诊;与SFT咨询相关的最初诊断最常见的是肿瘤。VVC和SFT结果的比较表明,更多的VVC访问导致药物建议,而更多的SFT咨询导致活检建议。结论:2020年,远程皮肤科有助于满足患者需求,并对临床管理产生影响。SFT和VVC患者的特征、诊断和与遭遇相关的影响类型各不相同。该分析提供了对退伍军人事务部系统内远程皮肤病学利用的深入了解,并有助于努力提高退伍军人远程皮肤病学护理的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Utilization and Impact of Live Interactive and Store-and-Forward Teledermatology in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction: Teledermatology has emerged as a promising method of continuing dermatologic care during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, including in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Analysis of the utilization and impact of teledermatology within the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System (SFVAHCS) may elucidate the ways that teledermatology programs can continue to be optimized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of live interactive encounters, Veterans Affairs Video Connect (VVC), store-and-forward telehealth (SFT), and face-to-face (FTF) consultations, performed within the SFVAHCS from March 2020 to December 2020. To assess utilization, we analyzed numbers of encounters throughout 2020. To assess impact, we analyzed primary diagnoses for each encounter and rates of recommendations for medications and lesion biopsies. Additionally, we assessed diagnostic accuracy associated with each teledermatology type by measuring concordance between teledermatologists' clinical diagnoses and histopathological diagnoses. Results: Two thousand two hundred fifty FTF, 347 VVC, and 470 SFT encounters were conducted from March to December 2020. More female patients utilized VVC, and patients who utilized VVC were younger than SFT and FTF users (p < 0.01). SFT was utilized more by patients from rural areas (p < 0.01). Diagnoses addressed were significantly different between VVC and SFT. A majority of VVC encounters involved referrals for inflammatory conditions; primary diagnoses associated with SFT consultations were most frequently neoplasms. Comparison of VVC and SFT outcomes showed that more VVC visits resulted in a medication recommendation, while more SFT consultations resulted in a biopsy recommendation. Conclusions: Teledermatology contributed to meeting patient needs throughout 2020 and created an impact on clinical management. Patient characteristics, diagnoses, and type of impact associated with encounters varied between SFT and VVC. This analysis provides insight into teledermatology utilization within the VA system and can contribute to efforts to improve the quality of teledermatology care for veterans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信