复杂的适应性治理系统:一个理解社会生态系统中的机构、组织和人的框架。

Socio-ecological practice research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s42532-021-00101-7
Candace K May
{"title":"复杂的适应性治理系统:一个理解社会生态系统中的机构、组织和人的框架。","authors":"Candace K May","doi":"10.1007/s42532-021-00101-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Governance is the reason for and solution to complex problems in socio-ecological systems (SESs). Governance refers to the institutions, organizations, and people involved in and affected by socio-ecological practices (SEPs), such as research, planning, design, construction, restoration, conservation, and management. The complexity of SESs requires the ability to understand and identify how the social world produces differential opportunities, constraints, and resources across multiple levels and scales of governance systems and as a consequence undesirable SEP outcomes for social equity, human well-being, and environmental integrity. This paper presents a complex adaptive governance systems framework (CAGS-F) designed to provide guidance, organization, and basic conceptualizations of social scientific concepts and terms for diagnostic, descriptive, and prescriptive inquiry into SEPs for the purpose of improving justice and sustainability. CAGS-F is unique for synthesizing the panarchy heuristic's focus on socio-ecological interdependence, cross-scalar, multi-causal, non-linear complexity, and change with compatible social scientific theories of multi-level institutions, organizations, and human practices. The framework works from a critical realist orientation to reveal how power and privilege embedded in institutions, organizations, and human practices produce inequitable and/or undesirable SEP outcomes. The structure of the framework employs analytic dualism to provide a way to identify where, at what level and scale, who is included and/or adversely affected, and at which point in discrete adaptive cycles across institutional, organizational, and human practices opportunities, barriers, and leverage points exist so as to optimize design, planning, programming, and implementation of SEPs or evaluate unintended and unforeseen, less than successful, inequitable, and/or undesirable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74830,"journal":{"name":"Socio-ecological practice research","volume":" ","pages":"39-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8762444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex adaptive governance systems: a framework to understand institutions, organizations, and people in socio-ecological systems.\",\"authors\":\"Candace K May\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42532-021-00101-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Governance is the reason for and solution to complex problems in socio-ecological systems (SESs). Governance refers to the institutions, organizations, and people involved in and affected by socio-ecological practices (SEPs), such as research, planning, design, construction, restoration, conservation, and management. The complexity of SESs requires the ability to understand and identify how the social world produces differential opportunities, constraints, and resources across multiple levels and scales of governance systems and as a consequence undesirable SEP outcomes for social equity, human well-being, and environmental integrity. This paper presents a complex adaptive governance systems framework (CAGS-F) designed to provide guidance, organization, and basic conceptualizations of social scientific concepts and terms for diagnostic, descriptive, and prescriptive inquiry into SEPs for the purpose of improving justice and sustainability. CAGS-F is unique for synthesizing the panarchy heuristic's focus on socio-ecological interdependence, cross-scalar, multi-causal, non-linear complexity, and change with compatible social scientific theories of multi-level institutions, organizations, and human practices. The framework works from a critical realist orientation to reveal how power and privilege embedded in institutions, organizations, and human practices produce inequitable and/or undesirable SEP outcomes. The structure of the framework employs analytic dualism to provide a way to identify where, at what level and scale, who is included and/or adversely affected, and at which point in discrete adaptive cycles across institutional, organizational, and human practices opportunities, barriers, and leverage points exist so as to optimize design, planning, programming, and implementation of SEPs or evaluate unintended and unforeseen, less than successful, inequitable, and/or undesirable outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socio-ecological practice research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"39-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8762444/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socio-ecological practice research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-021-00101-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-ecological practice research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-021-00101-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治理是社会生态系统复杂问题产生的原因,也是解决问题的途径。治理是指参与社会生态实践(sep)并受其影响的机构、组织和人员,如研究、规划、设计、建设、修复、保护和管理。SESs的复杂性要求理解和识别社会世界如何在治理系统的多个层次和规模上产生不同的机会、约束和资源,以及作为社会公平、人类福祉和环境完整性的不良SEP结果的能力。本文提出了一个复杂的适应性治理系统框架(CAGS-F),旨在为社会科学概念和术语的诊断性、描述性和规范性调查提供指导、组织和基本概念,以提高正义和可持续性。CAGS-F的独特之处在于将panarchy heur发式对社会生态相互依赖、跨标量、多原因、非线性复杂性和变化的关注与兼容的多层次机构、组织和人类实践的社会科学理论相结合。该框架从批判现实主义的方向出发,揭示了机构、组织和人类实践中嵌入的权力和特权如何产生不公平和/或不受欢迎的SEP结果。框架的结构采用分析二元论来提供一种方法,以确定在哪里,在什么水平和规模上,谁被包括和/或受到不利影响,以及在跨机构、组织和人类实践的离散适应循环中存在的机会、障碍和杠杆点的哪一点,以便优化设计、计划、编程和sep的实现,或评估意外的和不可预见的、不成功的、不公平的和/或不希望的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Complex adaptive governance systems: a framework to understand institutions, organizations, and people in socio-ecological systems.

Complex adaptive governance systems: a framework to understand institutions, organizations, and people in socio-ecological systems.

Complex adaptive governance systems: a framework to understand institutions, organizations, and people in socio-ecological systems.

Complex adaptive governance systems: a framework to understand institutions, organizations, and people in socio-ecological systems.

Governance is the reason for and solution to complex problems in socio-ecological systems (SESs). Governance refers to the institutions, organizations, and people involved in and affected by socio-ecological practices (SEPs), such as research, planning, design, construction, restoration, conservation, and management. The complexity of SESs requires the ability to understand and identify how the social world produces differential opportunities, constraints, and resources across multiple levels and scales of governance systems and as a consequence undesirable SEP outcomes for social equity, human well-being, and environmental integrity. This paper presents a complex adaptive governance systems framework (CAGS-F) designed to provide guidance, organization, and basic conceptualizations of social scientific concepts and terms for diagnostic, descriptive, and prescriptive inquiry into SEPs for the purpose of improving justice and sustainability. CAGS-F is unique for synthesizing the panarchy heuristic's focus on socio-ecological interdependence, cross-scalar, multi-causal, non-linear complexity, and change with compatible social scientific theories of multi-level institutions, organizations, and human practices. The framework works from a critical realist orientation to reveal how power and privilege embedded in institutions, organizations, and human practices produce inequitable and/or undesirable SEP outcomes. The structure of the framework employs analytic dualism to provide a way to identify where, at what level and scale, who is included and/or adversely affected, and at which point in discrete adaptive cycles across institutional, organizational, and human practices opportunities, barriers, and leverage points exist so as to optimize design, planning, programming, and implementation of SEPs or evaluate unintended and unforeseen, less than successful, inequitable, and/or undesirable outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信