损伤控制手术后再干预。

Pub Date : 2021-06-30 eCollection Date: 2021-04-01 DOI:10.25100/cm.v52i2.4805
David Mejia, Salin Pereira Warr, Carlos Andrés Delgado-López, Alexander Salcedo, Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín, José Julián Serna, Yaset Caicedo, Luis Fernando Pino, Adolfo González-Hadad, Mario Alain Herrera, Michael W Parra, Alberto García, Carlos A Ordoñez
{"title":"损伤控制手术后再干预。","authors":"David Mejia,&nbsp;Salin Pereira Warr,&nbsp;Carlos Andrés Delgado-López,&nbsp;Alexander Salcedo,&nbsp;Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín,&nbsp;José Julián Serna,&nbsp;Yaset Caicedo,&nbsp;Luis Fernando Pino,&nbsp;Adolfo González-Hadad,&nbsp;Mario Alain Herrera,&nbsp;Michael W Parra,&nbsp;Alberto García,&nbsp;Carlos A Ordoñez","doi":"10.25100/cm.v52i2.4805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Damage control has well-defined steps. However, there are still controversies regarding whom, when, and how re-interventions should be performed. This article summarizes the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) Cali-Colombia recommendations about the specific situations concerning second interventions of patients undergoing damage control surgery. We suggest packing as the preferred bleeding control strategy, followed by unpacking within the next 48-72 hours. In addition, a deferred anastomosis is recommended for correction of intestinal lesions, and patients treated with vascular shunts should be re-intervened within 24 hours for definitive management. Furthermore, abdominal or thoracic wall closure should be attempted within eight days. These strategies aim to decrease complications, morbidity, and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":72638,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"52 2","pages":"e4154805"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/11/5e/1657-9534-cm-52-02-e4154805.PMC8634277.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reinterventions after damage control surgery.\",\"authors\":\"David Mejia,&nbsp;Salin Pereira Warr,&nbsp;Carlos Andrés Delgado-López,&nbsp;Alexander Salcedo,&nbsp;Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín,&nbsp;José Julián Serna,&nbsp;Yaset Caicedo,&nbsp;Luis Fernando Pino,&nbsp;Adolfo González-Hadad,&nbsp;Mario Alain Herrera,&nbsp;Michael W Parra,&nbsp;Alberto García,&nbsp;Carlos A Ordoñez\",\"doi\":\"10.25100/cm.v52i2.4805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Damage control has well-defined steps. However, there are still controversies regarding whom, when, and how re-interventions should be performed. This article summarizes the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) Cali-Colombia recommendations about the specific situations concerning second interventions of patients undergoing damage control surgery. We suggest packing as the preferred bleeding control strategy, followed by unpacking within the next 48-72 hours. In addition, a deferred anastomosis is recommended for correction of intestinal lesions, and patients treated with vascular shunts should be re-intervened within 24 hours for definitive management. Furthermore, abdominal or thoracic wall closure should be attempted within eight days. These strategies aim to decrease complications, morbidity, and mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"e4154805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/11/5e/1657-9534-cm-52-02-e4154805.PMC8634277.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v52i2.4805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v52i2.4805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

损害控制有明确的步骤。然而,关于谁、何时以及如何进行再干预仍然存在争议。本文总结了加州-哥伦比亚创伤与急诊外科小组(CTE)关于对接受损伤控制手术的患者进行二次干预的具体情况的建议。我们建议将包装作为首选的出血控制策略,然后在接下来的48-72小时内拆包。此外,建议延期吻合矫正肠道病变,血管分流治疗的患者应在24小时内再次介入,以确定治疗。此外,腹壁或胸壁应在8天内关闭。这些策略旨在减少并发症、发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reinterventions after damage control surgery.

Damage control has well-defined steps. However, there are still controversies regarding whom, when, and how re-interventions should be performed. This article summarizes the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) Cali-Colombia recommendations about the specific situations concerning second interventions of patients undergoing damage control surgery. We suggest packing as the preferred bleeding control strategy, followed by unpacking within the next 48-72 hours. In addition, a deferred anastomosis is recommended for correction of intestinal lesions, and patients treated with vascular shunts should be re-intervened within 24 hours for definitive management. Furthermore, abdominal or thoracic wall closure should be attempted within eight days. These strategies aim to decrease complications, morbidity, and mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信