Christopher James Groombridge, Amit Maini, Darshini Ayton, Sze-Ee Soh, Nicola Walsham, Yesul Kim, De Villiers Smit, Mark Fitzgerald
{"title":"急诊医师在复苏过程中的压力经验及减轻压力对表现影响的策略。","authors":"Christopher James Groombridge, Amit Maini, Darshini Ayton, Sze-Ee Soh, Nicola Walsham, Yesul Kim, De Villiers Smit, Mark Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2021-211280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the perspectives and behaviours of emergency physicians (EPs), regularly involved in resuscitation, to identify the sources and effects of any stress experienced during a resuscitation as well as the strategies employed to deal with these stressors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a two-centre sequential exploratory mixed-methods study of EPs consisting of a focus group, exploring the human factors related to resuscitation, and an anonymous survey. Between April and June 2020, the online survey was distributed to all EPs working at Australia's largest two major trauma centres, both in Melbourne, and investigated sources of stress during resuscitation, impact of stress on performance, mitigation strategies used, impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stress and stress management training received. Associations with gender and years of clinical practice were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>7 EPs took part in the focus group and 82 responses to the online survey were received (81% response rate). The most common sources of stress reported were resuscitation of an 'unwell young paediatric patient' (81%, 95% CI 70.6 to 87.6) or 'unwell pregnant patient' (71%, 95% CI 60.1 to 79.5) and 'conflict with a team member' (71%, 95% CI 60.1 to 79.5). The most frequently reported strategies to mitigate stress were 'verbalising a plan to the team' (84%, 95% CI 74.7 to 90.5), 'implementing a standardised/structured approach' (73%, 95% CI 62.7 to 81.6) and 'asking for help' (57%, 95% CI 46.5 to 67.5). 79% (95% CI 69.3 to 86.6) of EPs reported that they would like additional training on stress management. Junior EPs more frequently reported the use of 'mental rehearsal' to mitigate stress during a resuscitation (62% vs 22%; p<0.01) while female EPs reported 'asking for help' as a mitigator of stress more frequently than male EPs (79% vs 47%; p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stress is commonly experienced by EPs during resuscitation and can impact decision-making and procedural performance. This study identifies the most common sources of stress during a resuscitation as well as the strategies that EPs use to mitigate the effects of stress on their performance. These findings may contribute to the development of tailored stress management training for critical care clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":410922,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","volume":" ","pages":"839-846"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency physicians' experience of stress during resuscitation and strategies for mitigating the effects of stress on performance.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher James Groombridge, Amit Maini, Darshini Ayton, Sze-Ee Soh, Nicola Walsham, Yesul Kim, De Villiers Smit, Mark Fitzgerald\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emermed-2021-211280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the perspectives and behaviours of emergency physicians (EPs), regularly involved in resuscitation, to identify the sources and effects of any stress experienced during a resuscitation as well as the strategies employed to deal with these stressors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a two-centre sequential exploratory mixed-methods study of EPs consisting of a focus group, exploring the human factors related to resuscitation, and an anonymous survey. Between April and June 2020, the online survey was distributed to all EPs working at Australia's largest two major trauma centres, both in Melbourne, and investigated sources of stress during resuscitation, impact of stress on performance, mitigation strategies used, impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stress and stress management training received. Associations with gender and years of clinical practice were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>7 EPs took part in the focus group and 82 responses to the online survey were received (81% response rate). The most common sources of stress reported were resuscitation of an 'unwell young paediatric patient' (81%, 95% CI 70.6 to 87.6) or 'unwell pregnant patient' (71%, 95% CI 60.1 to 79.5) and 'conflict with a team member' (71%, 95% CI 60.1 to 79.5). The most frequently reported strategies to mitigate stress were 'verbalising a plan to the team' (84%, 95% CI 74.7 to 90.5), 'implementing a standardised/structured approach' (73%, 95% CI 62.7 to 81.6) and 'asking for help' (57%, 95% CI 46.5 to 67.5). 79% (95% CI 69.3 to 86.6) of EPs reported that they would like additional training on stress management. Junior EPs more frequently reported the use of 'mental rehearsal' to mitigate stress during a resuscitation (62% vs 22%; p<0.01) while female EPs reported 'asking for help' as a mitigator of stress more frequently than male EPs (79% vs 47%; p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stress is commonly experienced by EPs during resuscitation and can impact decision-making and procedural performance. This study identifies the most common sources of stress during a resuscitation as well as the strategies that EPs use to mitigate the effects of stress on their performance. These findings may contribute to the development of tailored stress management training for critical care clinicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":410922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"839-846\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2021-211280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2021-211280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目的:本研究探讨急诊医生(EPs)的观点和行为,经常参与复苏,以确定在复苏过程中遇到的任何压力的来源和影响,以及应对这些压力源的策略。方法:这是一项双中心顺序探索性混合方法研究,包括焦点小组,探索与复苏相关的人为因素,以及匿名调查。2020年4月至6月期间,在线调查分发给了在墨尔本澳大利亚最大的两家主要创伤中心工作的所有急救人员,并调查了复苏期间的压力来源、压力对表现的影响、使用的缓解策略、COVID-19大流行对压力的影响以及所接受的压力管理培训。还研究了与性别和临床实践年数的关系。结果:有7名EPs参与焦点小组,收到82份在线调查反馈,回复率81%。报告中最常见的压力来源是“不适的年轻儿科患者”(81%,95% CI 70.6至87.6)或“不适的孕妇患者”(71%,95% CI 60.1至79.5)和“与团队成员的冲突”(71%,95% CI 60.1至79.5)的复苏。最常见的缓解压力的策略是“向团队口头表达计划”(84%,95%可信区间74.7至90.5),“实施标准化/结构化方法”(73%,95%可信区间62.7至81.6)和“寻求帮助”(57%,95%可信区间46.5至67.5)。79% (95% CI 69.3 - 86.6)的EPs表示,他们希望接受额外的压力管理培训。在复苏过程中,初级ep更频繁地使用“心理排练”来减轻压力(62%对22%;结论:EPs在复苏过程中普遍存在压力,并可影响决策和程序表现。这项研究确定了复苏过程中最常见的压力来源,以及EPs用来减轻压力对其表现影响的策略。这些发现可能有助于为重症监护临床医生量身定制压力管理培训。
Emergency physicians' experience of stress during resuscitation and strategies for mitigating the effects of stress on performance.
Objective: This study explored the perspectives and behaviours of emergency physicians (EPs), regularly involved in resuscitation, to identify the sources and effects of any stress experienced during a resuscitation as well as the strategies employed to deal with these stressors.
Methods: This was a two-centre sequential exploratory mixed-methods study of EPs consisting of a focus group, exploring the human factors related to resuscitation, and an anonymous survey. Between April and June 2020, the online survey was distributed to all EPs working at Australia's largest two major trauma centres, both in Melbourne, and investigated sources of stress during resuscitation, impact of stress on performance, mitigation strategies used, impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stress and stress management training received. Associations with gender and years of clinical practice were also examined.
Results: 7 EPs took part in the focus group and 82 responses to the online survey were received (81% response rate). The most common sources of stress reported were resuscitation of an 'unwell young paediatric patient' (81%, 95% CI 70.6 to 87.6) or 'unwell pregnant patient' (71%, 95% CI 60.1 to 79.5) and 'conflict with a team member' (71%, 95% CI 60.1 to 79.5). The most frequently reported strategies to mitigate stress were 'verbalising a plan to the team' (84%, 95% CI 74.7 to 90.5), 'implementing a standardised/structured approach' (73%, 95% CI 62.7 to 81.6) and 'asking for help' (57%, 95% CI 46.5 to 67.5). 79% (95% CI 69.3 to 86.6) of EPs reported that they would like additional training on stress management. Junior EPs more frequently reported the use of 'mental rehearsal' to mitigate stress during a resuscitation (62% vs 22%; p<0.01) while female EPs reported 'asking for help' as a mitigator of stress more frequently than male EPs (79% vs 47%; p=0.01).
Conclusions: Stress is commonly experienced by EPs during resuscitation and can impact decision-making and procedural performance. This study identifies the most common sources of stress during a resuscitation as well as the strategies that EPs use to mitigate the effects of stress on their performance. These findings may contribute to the development of tailored stress management training for critical care clinicians.