公共卫生应急响应领导力培训:多层次组织视角。

Q3 Medicine
Anthony Salerno, Yang Li, Xiaohong M Davis, Gail Stennies, Daniel J Barnett, Mary K Fisher, Laura Biesiadecki, Debra Dekker, NhuNgoc Pham, Juliana L Pearson, Michelle N Podgornik, David W Hunter, Sara Vagi, Edbert B Hsu
{"title":"公共卫生应急响应领导力培训:多层次组织视角。","authors":"Anthony Salerno,&nbsp;Yang Li,&nbsp;Xiaohong M Davis,&nbsp;Gail Stennies,&nbsp;Daniel J Barnett,&nbsp;Mary K Fisher,&nbsp;Laura Biesiadecki,&nbsp;Debra Dekker,&nbsp;NhuNgoc Pham,&nbsp;Juliana L Pearson,&nbsp;Michelle N Podgornik,&nbsp;David W Hunter,&nbsp;Sara Vagi,&nbsp;Edbert B Hsu","doi":"10.5055/ajdm.2021.0399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To capture organizational level information on the current state of public health emergency response leadership training.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A web-based questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>This multitiered assessment of health departments included two distinct respondent groups: (1) Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PHEP) Cooperative Agreement recipients (n = 34) and (2) local health departments (LHDs) (n = 169) representative of different agency sizes and populations served.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, PHEP and LHD respondents expressed a clear preference for participatory learning with practical drills/exercises and participatory workshops as the preferred training delivery modes. Compared with technical and role-specific training, leadership training was less available. For both PHEP and LHD respondents, staff availability for training is most notably limited due to lack of time. For PHEP respondents, a common factor limiting agency ability to offer training is lack of mentors/instructors, whereas for LHD respondents, it is limited funding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts should focus on increasing accessibility and the continued development of rigorous and effective training based on practical experience in all aspects of multitiered public health emergency response leadership.</p>","PeriodicalId":40040,"journal":{"name":"American journal of disaster medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State of public health emergency response leadership training: A multitiered organizational perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Salerno,&nbsp;Yang Li,&nbsp;Xiaohong M Davis,&nbsp;Gail Stennies,&nbsp;Daniel J Barnett,&nbsp;Mary K Fisher,&nbsp;Laura Biesiadecki,&nbsp;Debra Dekker,&nbsp;NhuNgoc Pham,&nbsp;Juliana L Pearson,&nbsp;Michelle N Podgornik,&nbsp;David W Hunter,&nbsp;Sara Vagi,&nbsp;Edbert B Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.5055/ajdm.2021.0399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To capture organizational level information on the current state of public health emergency response leadership training.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A web-based questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>This multitiered assessment of health departments included two distinct respondent groups: (1) Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PHEP) Cooperative Agreement recipients (n = 34) and (2) local health departments (LHDs) (n = 169) representative of different agency sizes and populations served.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, PHEP and LHD respondents expressed a clear preference for participatory learning with practical drills/exercises and participatory workshops as the preferred training delivery modes. Compared with technical and role-specific training, leadership training was less available. For both PHEP and LHD respondents, staff availability for training is most notably limited due to lack of time. For PHEP respondents, a common factor limiting agency ability to offer training is lack of mentors/instructors, whereas for LHD respondents, it is limited funding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts should focus on increasing accessibility and the continued development of rigorous and effective training based on practical experience in all aspects of multitiered public health emergency response leadership.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of disaster medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of disaster medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2021.0399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of disaster medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2021.0399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:了解组织层面的突发公共卫生事件应急领导能力培训现状。设计:基于网络的问卷调查。参与者:这项对卫生部门的多层次评估包括两个不同的受访者群体:(1)公共卫生应急准备(PHEP)合作协议接受者(n = 34)和(2)代表不同机构规模和服务人群的地方卫生部门(n = 169)。结果:总体而言,PHEP和LHD受访者明确表示更倾向于参与式学习,并将实践练习和参与式研讨会作为首选的培训交付模式。与技术培训和角色培训相比,领导力培训的可获得性较低。对于PHEP和LHD受访者而言,由于缺乏时间,员工可接受培训的情况最为明显。对于PHEP受访者来说,限制机构提供培训能力的一个常见因素是缺乏导师/讲师,而对于LHD受访者来说,限制机构提供培训的一个常见因素是资金有限。结论:应努力增加可及性,并根据多层次突发公共卫生事件应对领导各方面的实际经验,继续开展严格有效的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State of public health emergency response leadership training: A multitiered organizational perspective.

Objective: To capture organizational level information on the current state of public health emergency response leadership training.

Design: A web-based questionnaire.

Participants: This multitiered assessment of health departments included two distinct respondent groups: (1) Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PHEP) Cooperative Agreement recipients (n = 34) and (2) local health departments (LHDs) (n = 169) representative of different agency sizes and populations served.

Results: Overall, PHEP and LHD respondents expressed a clear preference for participatory learning with practical drills/exercises and participatory workshops as the preferred training delivery modes. Compared with technical and role-specific training, leadership training was less available. For both PHEP and LHD respondents, staff availability for training is most notably limited due to lack of time. For PHEP respondents, a common factor limiting agency ability to offer training is lack of mentors/instructors, whereas for LHD respondents, it is limited funding.

Conclusions: Efforts should focus on increasing accessibility and the continued development of rigorous and effective training based on practical experience in all aspects of multitiered public health emergency response leadership.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of disaster medicine
American journal of disaster medicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: With the publication of the American Journal of Disaster Medicine, for the first time, comes real guidance in this new medical specialty from the country"s foremost experts in areas most physicians and medical professionals have never seen…a deadly cocktail of catastrophic events like blast wounds and post explosion injuries, biological weapons contamination and mass physical and psychological trauma that comes in the wake of natural disasters and disease outbreak. The journal has one goal: to provide physicians and medical professionals the essential informational tools they need as they seek to combine emergency medical and trauma skills with crisis management and new forms of triage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信