每隔多长时间应根据漂移校正一次死沉动物的移动路径?

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Richard M Gunner, Mark D Holton, David M Scantlebury, Phil Hopkins, Emily L C Shepard, Adam J Fell, Baptiste Garde, Flavio Quintana, Agustina Gómez-Laich, Ken Yoda, Takashi Yamamoto, Holly English, Sam Ferreira, Danny Govender, Pauli Viljoen, Angela Bruns, O Louis van Schalkwyk, Nik C Cole, Vikash Tatayah, Luca Börger, James Redcliffe, Stephen H Bell, Nikki J Marks, Nigel C Bennett, Mariano H Tonini, Hannah J Williams, Carlos M Duarte, Martin C van Rooyen, Mads F Bertelsen, Craig J Tambling, Rory P Wilson
{"title":"每隔多长时间应根据漂移校正一次死沉动物的移动路径?","authors":"Richard M Gunner, Mark D Holton, David M Scantlebury, Phil Hopkins, Emily L C Shepard, Adam J Fell, Baptiste Garde, Flavio Quintana, Agustina Gómez-Laich, Ken Yoda, Takashi Yamamoto, Holly English, Sam Ferreira, Danny Govender, Pauli Viljoen, Angela Bruns, O Louis van Schalkwyk, Nik C Cole, Vikash Tatayah, Luca Börger, James Redcliffe, Stephen H Bell, Nikki J Marks, Nigel C Bennett, Mariano H Tonini, Hannah J Williams, Carlos M Duarte, Martin C van Rooyen, Mads F Bertelsen, Craig J Tambling, Rory P Wilson","doi":"10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding what animals do in time and space is important for a range of ecological questions, however accurate estimates of how animals use space is challenging. Within the use of animal-attached tags, radio telemetry (including the Global Positioning System, 'GPS') is typically used to verify an animal's location periodically. Straight lines are typically drawn between these 'Verified Positions' ('VPs') so the interpolation of space-use is limited by the temporal and spatial resolution of the system's measurement. As such, parameters such as route-taken and distance travelled can be poorly represented when using VP systems alone. Dead-reckoning has been suggested as a technique to improve the accuracy and resolution of reconstructed movement paths, whilst maximising battery life of VP systems. This typically involves deriving travel vectors from motion sensor systems and periodically correcting path dimensions for drift with simultaneously deployed VP systems. How often paths should be corrected for drift, however, has remained unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Here, we review the utility of dead-reckoning across four contrasting model species using different forms of locomotion (the African lion <i>Panthera leo</i>, the red-tailed tropicbird <i>Phaethon rubricauda</i>, the Magellanic penguin <i>Spheniscus magellanicus</i>, and the imperial cormorant <i>Leucocarbo atriceps</i>). Simulations were performed to examine the extent of dead-reckoning error, relative to VPs, as a function of Verified Position correction (VP correction) rate and the effect of this on estimates of distance moved. Dead-reckoning error was greatest for animals travelling within air and water. We demonstrate how sources of measurement error can arise within VP-corrected dead-reckoned tracks and propose advancements to this procedure to maximise dead-reckoning accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We review the utility of VP-corrected dead-reckoning according to movement type and consider a range of ecological questions that would benefit from dead-reckoning, primarily concerning animal-barrier interactions and foraging strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":37711,"journal":{"name":"Animal Biotelemetry","volume":"9 ","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?\",\"authors\":\"Richard M Gunner, Mark D Holton, David M Scantlebury, Phil Hopkins, Emily L C Shepard, Adam J Fell, Baptiste Garde, Flavio Quintana, Agustina Gómez-Laich, Ken Yoda, Takashi Yamamoto, Holly English, Sam Ferreira, Danny Govender, Pauli Viljoen, Angela Bruns, O Louis van Schalkwyk, Nik C Cole, Vikash Tatayah, Luca Börger, James Redcliffe, Stephen H Bell, Nikki J Marks, Nigel C Bennett, Mariano H Tonini, Hannah J Williams, Carlos M Duarte, Martin C van Rooyen, Mads F Bertelsen, Craig J Tambling, Rory P Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding what animals do in time and space is important for a range of ecological questions, however accurate estimates of how animals use space is challenging. Within the use of animal-attached tags, radio telemetry (including the Global Positioning System, 'GPS') is typically used to verify an animal's location periodically. Straight lines are typically drawn between these 'Verified Positions' ('VPs') so the interpolation of space-use is limited by the temporal and spatial resolution of the system's measurement. As such, parameters such as route-taken and distance travelled can be poorly represented when using VP systems alone. Dead-reckoning has been suggested as a technique to improve the accuracy and resolution of reconstructed movement paths, whilst maximising battery life of VP systems. This typically involves deriving travel vectors from motion sensor systems and periodically correcting path dimensions for drift with simultaneously deployed VP systems. How often paths should be corrected for drift, however, has remained unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Here, we review the utility of dead-reckoning across four contrasting model species using different forms of locomotion (the African lion <i>Panthera leo</i>, the red-tailed tropicbird <i>Phaethon rubricauda</i>, the Magellanic penguin <i>Spheniscus magellanicus</i>, and the imperial cormorant <i>Leucocarbo atriceps</i>). Simulations were performed to examine the extent of dead-reckoning error, relative to VPs, as a function of Verified Position correction (VP correction) rate and the effect of this on estimates of distance moved. Dead-reckoning error was greatest for animals travelling within air and water. We demonstrate how sources of measurement error can arise within VP-corrected dead-reckoned tracks and propose advancements to this procedure to maximise dead-reckoning accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We review the utility of VP-corrected dead-reckoning according to movement type and consider a range of ecological questions that would benefit from dead-reckoning, primarily concerning animal-barrier interactions and foraging strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Biotelemetry\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612089/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Biotelemetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Biotelemetry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-021-00265-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:了解动物在时间和空间上的活动对一系列生态问题非常重要,但准确估计动物如何利用空间却很有挑战性。在使用动物附着的标签时,通常会使用无线电遥测技术(包括全球定位系统)定期验证动物的位置。这些 "验证位置"("VPs")之间通常画有直线,因此空间使用的内插法受到系统测量的时间和空间分辨率的限制。因此,仅使用 VP 系统无法很好地反映路线和行驶距离等参数。有人建议采用死区重现技术来提高重建运动路径的准确性和分辨率,同时最大限度地延长虚拟专用空间系统的电池寿命。这通常包括从运动传感器系统中推导出移动矢量,并通过同时部署的虚拟景深系统定期校正路径尺寸以避免漂移。然而,应该多久对路径进行一次漂移校正仍不清楚:在此,我们回顾了四种使用不同运动形式的对比模型物种(非洲狮(Panthera leo)、红尾鸏(Phaethon rubricauda)、麦哲伦企鹅(Spheniscus magellanicus)和帝王鸬鹚(Leucocarbo atriceps))死重定位的实用性。我们进行了模拟实验,以检验死飞误差(相对于 VPs)与验证位置校正(VP 校正)率的函数关系,以及死飞误差对移动距离估计值的影响。在空气和水中行进的动物的定位误差最大。我们展示了经 VP 校正的死点定位轨迹如何产生测量误差,并提出了改进这一程序的建议,以最大限度地提高死点定位的准确性:结论:我们根据运动类型回顾了VP校正致死重测法的实用性,并考虑了一系列将受益于致死重测法的生态问题,主要涉及动物与障碍物之间的相互作用和觅食策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?

How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?

How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?

How often should dead-reckoned animal movement paths be corrected for drift?

Background: Understanding what animals do in time and space is important for a range of ecological questions, however accurate estimates of how animals use space is challenging. Within the use of animal-attached tags, radio telemetry (including the Global Positioning System, 'GPS') is typically used to verify an animal's location periodically. Straight lines are typically drawn between these 'Verified Positions' ('VPs') so the interpolation of space-use is limited by the temporal and spatial resolution of the system's measurement. As such, parameters such as route-taken and distance travelled can be poorly represented when using VP systems alone. Dead-reckoning has been suggested as a technique to improve the accuracy and resolution of reconstructed movement paths, whilst maximising battery life of VP systems. This typically involves deriving travel vectors from motion sensor systems and periodically correcting path dimensions for drift with simultaneously deployed VP systems. How often paths should be corrected for drift, however, has remained unclear.

Methods and results: Here, we review the utility of dead-reckoning across four contrasting model species using different forms of locomotion (the African lion Panthera leo, the red-tailed tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda, the Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus, and the imperial cormorant Leucocarbo atriceps). Simulations were performed to examine the extent of dead-reckoning error, relative to VPs, as a function of Verified Position correction (VP correction) rate and the effect of this on estimates of distance moved. Dead-reckoning error was greatest for animals travelling within air and water. We demonstrate how sources of measurement error can arise within VP-corrected dead-reckoned tracks and propose advancements to this procedure to maximise dead-reckoning accuracy.

Conclusions: We review the utility of VP-corrected dead-reckoning according to movement type and consider a range of ecological questions that would benefit from dead-reckoning, primarily concerning animal-barrier interactions and foraging strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Biotelemetry
Animal Biotelemetry Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Biotelemetry is an open access peer-reviewed journal that publishes the results of studies utilizing telemetric techniques (including biologgers) to understand physiological, behavioural, and ecological mechanisms in a broad range of environments (e.g. terrestrial, freshwater and marine) and taxa. The journal also welcomes descriptions and validations of newly developed tagging techniques and tracking technologies, as well as methods for analyzing telemetric data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信