质子泵抑制剂与肝硬化并发症的相关性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Seong Jun Hwang, Dong Hyeon Lee, Seong-Joon Koh, Ji Won Kim, Hyun Sun Park, Byeong Gwan Kim, Kook Lae Lee
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂与肝硬化并发症的相关性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Seong Jun Hwang,&nbsp;Dong Hyeon Lee,&nbsp;Seong-Joon Koh,&nbsp;Ji Won Kim,&nbsp;Hyun Sun Park,&nbsp;Byeong Gwan Kim,&nbsp;Kook Lae Lee","doi":"10.5152/tjg.2022.20689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many studies and meta-analyses have investigated the associations among proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE), and other infections. However, these studies had limitations, including the omission of several relevant studies and drawing conclusions, based on the abstracts without consulting the full-text of the articles. To evaluate the association between PPIs and complications arising from cirrhosis and risks of PPI use in patients with cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the selected studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 studies (13 case-control and 16 cohort studies) involving 20,484 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The total relative risk (RR) for the 23 studies which investigated SBP was 1.31, and the 95% CI was 1.10-1.55 (I2 = 73.0%). The total RR for the 7 studies which examined PSE was 1.25 (95% CI 0.85-1.84, I2 = 96.1%). For the 7 studies which analyzed overall infection, the total RR was 1.37 (95% CI 1.07-1.76, I2 = 79.3%). The RR for the 2 cohort studies that assessed mortality was 1.39 (95% CI 0.85-2.27, I2 = 0.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPI use in cirrhosis patients increased the SBP and overall infection risk. PPIs should be considered with appropriate indications when the benefits exceed the risks in cirrhosis patients with ascites.</p>","PeriodicalId":518528,"journal":{"name":"The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"44-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128585/pdf/tjg-33-1-44.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation Between Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Complications of Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Seong Jun Hwang,&nbsp;Dong Hyeon Lee,&nbsp;Seong-Joon Koh,&nbsp;Ji Won Kim,&nbsp;Hyun Sun Park,&nbsp;Byeong Gwan Kim,&nbsp;Kook Lae Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/tjg.2022.20689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many studies and meta-analyses have investigated the associations among proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE), and other infections. However, these studies had limitations, including the omission of several relevant studies and drawing conclusions, based on the abstracts without consulting the full-text of the articles. To evaluate the association between PPIs and complications arising from cirrhosis and risks of PPI use in patients with cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the selected studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 studies (13 case-control and 16 cohort studies) involving 20,484 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The total relative risk (RR) for the 23 studies which investigated SBP was 1.31, and the 95% CI was 1.10-1.55 (I2 = 73.0%). The total RR for the 7 studies which examined PSE was 1.25 (95% CI 0.85-1.84, I2 = 96.1%). For the 7 studies which analyzed overall infection, the total RR was 1.37 (95% CI 1.07-1.76, I2 = 79.3%). The RR for the 2 cohort studies that assessed mortality was 1.39 (95% CI 0.85-2.27, I2 = 0.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPI use in cirrhosis patients increased the SBP and overall infection risk. PPIs should be considered with appropriate indications when the benefits exceed the risks in cirrhosis patients with ascites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":518528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"44-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9128585/pdf/tjg-33-1-44.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2022.20689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2022.20689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多研究和荟萃分析调查了质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)、自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)、门系统性脑病(PSE)和其他感染之间的关系。然而,这些研究存在局限性,包括遗漏了一些相关的研究,以及在没有查阅文章全文的情况下根据摘要得出结论。评估PPI与肝硬化并发症的关系以及肝硬化患者使用PPI的风险。方法:数据从EMBASE、PubMed、Cochrane和Google Scholar数据库中提取。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表用于评估所选研究的质量。结果:meta分析共纳入29项研究(13项病例对照研究和16项队列研究),涉及20,484例患者。调查收缩压的23项研究的总相对危险度(RR)为1.31,95% CI为1.10 ~ 1.55 (I2 = 73.0%)。7项检查PSE的研究的总RR为1.25 (95% CI 0.85-1.84, I2 = 96.1%)。分析总体感染的7项研究,总RR为1.37 (95% CI 1.07-1.76, I2 = 79.3%)。评估死亡率的2项队列研究的RR为1.39 (95% CI 0.85-2.27, I2 = 0.0%)。结论:肝硬化患者使用PPI会增加收缩压和总体感染风险。当肝硬化腹水患者的益处超过风险时,应考虑适当的适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Correlation Between Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Complications of Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Correlation Between Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Complications of Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Many studies and meta-analyses have investigated the associations among proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE), and other infections. However, these studies had limitations, including the omission of several relevant studies and drawing conclusions, based on the abstracts without consulting the full-text of the articles. To evaluate the association between PPIs and complications arising from cirrhosis and risks of PPI use in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods: Data were extracted from the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the selected studies.

Results: A total of 29 studies (13 case-control and 16 cohort studies) involving 20,484 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The total relative risk (RR) for the 23 studies which investigated SBP was 1.31, and the 95% CI was 1.10-1.55 (I2 = 73.0%). The total RR for the 7 studies which examined PSE was 1.25 (95% CI 0.85-1.84, I2 = 96.1%). For the 7 studies which analyzed overall infection, the total RR was 1.37 (95% CI 1.07-1.76, I2 = 79.3%). The RR for the 2 cohort studies that assessed mortality was 1.39 (95% CI 0.85-2.27, I2 = 0.0%).

Conclusion: PPI use in cirrhosis patients increased the SBP and overall infection risk. PPIs should be considered with appropriate indications when the benefits exceed the risks in cirrhosis patients with ascites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信