Thomas A Morinelli, David J Taber, Zemin Su, James R Rodrigue, Zachary Sutton, Misty Chastain, Tiffany Thompkins Tindal, Erin Weeda, Patrick D Mauldin, Michael Casey, John Bian, Prabhakar Baliga, Derek A DuBay
{"title":"透析中心教育视频干预提高患者自我效能和肾移植评估。","authors":"Thomas A Morinelli, David J Taber, Zemin Su, James R Rodrigue, Zachary Sutton, Misty Chastain, Tiffany Thompkins Tindal, Erin Weeda, Patrick D Mauldin, Michael Casey, John Bian, Prabhakar Baliga, Derek A DuBay","doi":"10.1177/15269248211064882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease is renal transplant. However, only 1 in 5 (21.5%) patients nationwide receiving dialysis are on a transplant waitlist. Factors associated with patients not initiating a transplant evaluation are complex and include patient specific factors such as transplant knowledge and self-efficacy. <b>Research Question:</b> Can a dialysis center-based educational video intervention increase dialysis patients' transplant knowledge, self-efficacy, and transplant evaluations initiated? <b>Design:</b> Dialysis patients who had not yet completed a transplant evaluation were provided a transplant educational video while receiving hemodialysis. Patients' transplant knowledge, self-efficacy to initiate an evaluation, and dialysis center rates of transplant referral and evaluation were assessed before and after this intervention. <b>Results:</b> Of 340 patients approached at 14 centers, 252 (74%) completed the intervention. The intervention increased transplant knowledge (Likert scale 1 to 5: 2.53 [0.10] vs 4.62 [0.05], <i>P</i> < .001) and transplant self-efficacy (2.55 [0.10] to 4.33 [0.07], <i>P</i> < .001. The incidence rate per 100 patient years of transplant evaluations increased 85% (IRR 1.85 [95% CI: 1.02, 3.35], <i>P</i> = .0422) following the intervention. The incidence rates of referrals also increased 56% (IRR 1.56 [95% CI: 1.03, 2.37], <i>P</i> = .0352), while there was a nonsignificant 47% increase in incidence rates of waitlist entries (IRR 1.47 [95% CI: 0.45, 4.74], <i>P</i> = .5210). <b>Conclusion:</b> This dialysis center-based video intervention provides promising preliminary evidence to conduct a large-scale randomized controlled trial to test its effectiveness in increasing self-efficacy of dialysis patients to initiate a transplant evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":346415,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)","volume":" ","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Dialysis Center Educational Video Intervention Increases Patient Self-Efficacy and Kidney Transplant Evaluations.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas A Morinelli, David J Taber, Zemin Su, James R Rodrigue, Zachary Sutton, Misty Chastain, Tiffany Thompkins Tindal, Erin Weeda, Patrick D Mauldin, Michael Casey, John Bian, Prabhakar Baliga, Derek A DuBay\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15269248211064882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease is renal transplant. However, only 1 in 5 (21.5%) patients nationwide receiving dialysis are on a transplant waitlist. Factors associated with patients not initiating a transplant evaluation are complex and include patient specific factors such as transplant knowledge and self-efficacy. <b>Research Question:</b> Can a dialysis center-based educational video intervention increase dialysis patients' transplant knowledge, self-efficacy, and transplant evaluations initiated? <b>Design:</b> Dialysis patients who had not yet completed a transplant evaluation were provided a transplant educational video while receiving hemodialysis. Patients' transplant knowledge, self-efficacy to initiate an evaluation, and dialysis center rates of transplant referral and evaluation were assessed before and after this intervention. <b>Results:</b> Of 340 patients approached at 14 centers, 252 (74%) completed the intervention. The intervention increased transplant knowledge (Likert scale 1 to 5: 2.53 [0.10] vs 4.62 [0.05], <i>P</i> < .001) and transplant self-efficacy (2.55 [0.10] to 4.33 [0.07], <i>P</i> < .001. The incidence rate per 100 patient years of transplant evaluations increased 85% (IRR 1.85 [95% CI: 1.02, 3.35], <i>P</i> = .0422) following the intervention. The incidence rates of referrals also increased 56% (IRR 1.56 [95% CI: 1.03, 2.37], <i>P</i> = .0352), while there was a nonsignificant 47% increase in incidence rates of waitlist entries (IRR 1.47 [95% CI: 0.45, 4.74], <i>P</i> = .5210). <b>Conclusion:</b> This dialysis center-based video intervention provides promising preliminary evidence to conduct a large-scale randomized controlled trial to test its effectiveness in increasing self-efficacy of dialysis patients to initiate a transplant evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":346415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"27-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248211064882\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248211064882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
终末期肾病的最佳治疗方法是肾移植。然而,全国只有五分之一(21.5%)接受透析的患者在移植等待名单上。患者不进行移植评估的相关因素是复杂的,包括患者特定的因素,如移植知识和自我效能感。研究问题:以透析中心为基础的教育视频干预能否提高透析患者的移植知识、自我效能感和对移植的评估?设计:尚未完成移植评估的透析患者在接受血液透析的同时提供移植教育视频。评估干预前后患者的移植知识、启动评估的自我效能感、透析中心移植转诊和评估率。结果:在14个中心的340例患者中,252例(74%)完成了干预。干预后移植知识增加(李克特量表1 ~ 5:2.53 [0.10]vs 4.62 [0.05], P P P = 0.0422)。转诊的发生率也增加了56% (IRR 1.56 [95% CI: 1.03, 2.37], P = 0.0352),而等候名单的发生率增加了47% (IRR 1.47 [95% CI: 0.45, 4.74], P = 0.5210)。结论:这种基于透析中心的视频干预提供了有希望的初步证据,可以进行大规模随机对照试验,以测试其在提高透析患者自我效能以启动移植评估方面的有效性。
A Dialysis Center Educational Video Intervention Increases Patient Self-Efficacy and Kidney Transplant Evaluations.
Introduction: The optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease is renal transplant. However, only 1 in 5 (21.5%) patients nationwide receiving dialysis are on a transplant waitlist. Factors associated with patients not initiating a transplant evaluation are complex and include patient specific factors such as transplant knowledge and self-efficacy. Research Question: Can a dialysis center-based educational video intervention increase dialysis patients' transplant knowledge, self-efficacy, and transplant evaluations initiated? Design: Dialysis patients who had not yet completed a transplant evaluation were provided a transplant educational video while receiving hemodialysis. Patients' transplant knowledge, self-efficacy to initiate an evaluation, and dialysis center rates of transplant referral and evaluation were assessed before and after this intervention. Results: Of 340 patients approached at 14 centers, 252 (74%) completed the intervention. The intervention increased transplant knowledge (Likert scale 1 to 5: 2.53 [0.10] vs 4.62 [0.05], P < .001) and transplant self-efficacy (2.55 [0.10] to 4.33 [0.07], P < .001. The incidence rate per 100 patient years of transplant evaluations increased 85% (IRR 1.85 [95% CI: 1.02, 3.35], P = .0422) following the intervention. The incidence rates of referrals also increased 56% (IRR 1.56 [95% CI: 1.03, 2.37], P = .0352), while there was a nonsignificant 47% increase in incidence rates of waitlist entries (IRR 1.47 [95% CI: 0.45, 4.74], P = .5210). Conclusion: This dialysis center-based video intervention provides promising preliminary evidence to conduct a large-scale randomized controlled trial to test its effectiveness in increasing self-efficacy of dialysis patients to initiate a transplant evaluation.