基于地球的研究类似物来调查基于空间的健康风险。

New space Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-20 DOI:10.1089/space.2020.0048
Ronita L Cromwell, Janice L Huff, Lisa C Simonsen, Zarana S Patel
{"title":"基于地球的研究类似物来调查基于空间的健康风险。","authors":"Ronita L Cromwell,&nbsp;Janice L Huff,&nbsp;Lisa C Simonsen,&nbsp;Zarana S Patel","doi":"10.1089/space.2020.0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During spaceflight, astronauts are exposed to a variety of unique hazards, including altered gravity fields, long periods of isolation and confinement, living in a closed environment at increasing distances from Earth, and exposure to higher levels of hazardous ionizing radiation. Preserving human health and performance in the face of these relentless hazards becomes progressively more difficult as missions increase in length and extend beyond low Earth orbit. Finding solutions is a significant challenge that is further complicated by logistical issues associated with studying these unique hazards. Although research studies using space-based platforms are the gold standard, these are not without limitations. Factors such as the small sample size of the available astronaut crew, high expense, and time constraints all add to the logistical challenge. To overcome these limitations, a wide variety of Earth-based analogs, from polar research outposts to an undersea laboratory, are available to augment space-based studies. Each analog simulates unique physiological and behavioral effects associated with spaceflight and, therefore, for any given study, the choice of an appropriate platform is closely linked to the phenomena under investigation as well as the characteristics of the analog. There are pros and cons to each type of analog and each actual facility, but overall they provide a reasonable means to overcome the barriers associated with conducting experimental research in space. Analogs, by definition, will never be perfect, but they are a useful component of an integrated effort to understand the human risks of living and working in space. They are a necessary resource for pushing the frontier of human spaceflight, both for astronauts and for commercial space activities. In this review, we describe the use of analogs here on Earth to replicate specific aspects of the spaceflight environment and highlight how analog studies support future human endeavors in space.</p>","PeriodicalId":91035,"journal":{"name":"New space","volume":"9 4","pages":"204-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/df/space.2020.0048.PMC8743922.pdf","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Earth-Based Research Analogs to Investigate Space-Based Health Risks.\",\"authors\":\"Ronita L Cromwell,&nbsp;Janice L Huff,&nbsp;Lisa C Simonsen,&nbsp;Zarana S Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/space.2020.0048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During spaceflight, astronauts are exposed to a variety of unique hazards, including altered gravity fields, long periods of isolation and confinement, living in a closed environment at increasing distances from Earth, and exposure to higher levels of hazardous ionizing radiation. Preserving human health and performance in the face of these relentless hazards becomes progressively more difficult as missions increase in length and extend beyond low Earth orbit. Finding solutions is a significant challenge that is further complicated by logistical issues associated with studying these unique hazards. Although research studies using space-based platforms are the gold standard, these are not without limitations. Factors such as the small sample size of the available astronaut crew, high expense, and time constraints all add to the logistical challenge. To overcome these limitations, a wide variety of Earth-based analogs, from polar research outposts to an undersea laboratory, are available to augment space-based studies. Each analog simulates unique physiological and behavioral effects associated with spaceflight and, therefore, for any given study, the choice of an appropriate platform is closely linked to the phenomena under investigation as well as the characteristics of the analog. There are pros and cons to each type of analog and each actual facility, but overall they provide a reasonable means to overcome the barriers associated with conducting experimental research in space. Analogs, by definition, will never be perfect, but they are a useful component of an integrated effort to understand the human risks of living and working in space. They are a necessary resource for pushing the frontier of human spaceflight, both for astronauts and for commercial space activities. In this review, we describe the use of analogs here on Earth to replicate specific aspects of the spaceflight environment and highlight how analog studies support future human endeavors in space.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New space\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"204-216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/df/space.2020.0048.PMC8743922.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/space.2020.0048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/space.2020.0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

在太空飞行过程中,宇航员暴露在各种独特的危险中,包括改变重力场、长时间的隔离和禁闭、生活在离地球越来越远的封闭环境中,以及暴露在更高水平的危险电离辐射中。随着任务长度的增加和延伸到近地轨道之外,在这些无情的危险面前保护人类健康和表现变得越来越困难。寻找解决方案是一项重大挑战,与研究这些独特危险相关的后勤问题使这项挑战更加复杂。尽管使用天基平台的研究是黄金标准,但这些研究并非没有局限性。现有宇航员样本量小、费用高和时间限制等因素都增加了后勤挑战。为了克服这些限制,从极地研究前哨站到海底实验室,各种各样的基于地球的类似物都可用于加强天基研究。每种模拟物都模拟与太空飞行相关的独特生理和行为效应,因此,对于任何给定的研究,适当平台的选择都与所研究的现象以及模拟物的特性密切相关。每种类型的模拟和每种实际设施都有利弊,但总的来说,它们提供了一种合理的手段来克服在太空进行实验研究的障碍。根据定义,类比永远不会是完美的,但它们是理解人类在太空生活和工作风险的综合努力的有用组成部分。无论是对宇航员还是商业太空活动来说,它们都是推动载人航天前沿的必要资源。在这篇综述中,我们描述了在地球上使用类似物来复制太空环境的特定方面,并强调了模拟研究如何支持未来人类在太空中的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Earth-Based Research Analogs to Investigate Space-Based Health Risks.

Earth-Based Research Analogs to Investigate Space-Based Health Risks.

Earth-Based Research Analogs to Investigate Space-Based Health Risks.

Earth-Based Research Analogs to Investigate Space-Based Health Risks.

During spaceflight, astronauts are exposed to a variety of unique hazards, including altered gravity fields, long periods of isolation and confinement, living in a closed environment at increasing distances from Earth, and exposure to higher levels of hazardous ionizing radiation. Preserving human health and performance in the face of these relentless hazards becomes progressively more difficult as missions increase in length and extend beyond low Earth orbit. Finding solutions is a significant challenge that is further complicated by logistical issues associated with studying these unique hazards. Although research studies using space-based platforms are the gold standard, these are not without limitations. Factors such as the small sample size of the available astronaut crew, high expense, and time constraints all add to the logistical challenge. To overcome these limitations, a wide variety of Earth-based analogs, from polar research outposts to an undersea laboratory, are available to augment space-based studies. Each analog simulates unique physiological and behavioral effects associated with spaceflight and, therefore, for any given study, the choice of an appropriate platform is closely linked to the phenomena under investigation as well as the characteristics of the analog. There are pros and cons to each type of analog and each actual facility, but overall they provide a reasonable means to overcome the barriers associated with conducting experimental research in space. Analogs, by definition, will never be perfect, but they are a useful component of an integrated effort to understand the human risks of living and working in space. They are a necessary resource for pushing the frontier of human spaceflight, both for astronauts and for commercial space activities. In this review, we describe the use of analogs here on Earth to replicate specific aspects of the spaceflight environment and highlight how analog studies support future human endeavors in space.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信