从通才到专才:不孕症患者认知的定性研究

Q1 Social Sciences
Ophra Leyser-Whalen , Brianne Bombach , Sara Mahmoud , Arthur L. Greil
{"title":"从通才到专才:不孕症患者认知的定性研究","authors":"Ophra Leyser-Whalen ,&nbsp;Brianne Bombach ,&nbsp;Sara Mahmoud ,&nbsp;Arthur L. Greil","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Few studies explore in-depth accounts of women’s and men’s experiences with, and transitions between, obstetrician/gynaecologists (OB/GYNs) and reproductive endocrinologists during infertility diagnostic and treatment processes. This study examined this subject matter with data from qualitative, in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Between April 2007 and March 2008, the first author interviewed 20 women and eight men from a large midwestern metropolitan area in the USA who had used, or were in the process of using, any fertility treatment in the 5 years preceding the interview. Six couples and 16 individuals were interviewed, resulting in narratives of 22 distinct infertility journeys. The main complaints made by respondents about OB/GYNs were that they were insufficiently concerned with providing timely treatment and that they paid insufficient attention to male partners. Women felt that their concerns were taken more seriously by reproductive endocrinologists, but complained of insensitivity, depersonalization and misinformation, and were suspicious of a profit orientation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"14 ","pages":"Pages 204-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/16/61/main.PMC8753058.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From generalist to specialist: A qualitative study of the perceptions of infertility patients\",\"authors\":\"Ophra Leyser-Whalen ,&nbsp;Brianne Bombach ,&nbsp;Sara Mahmoud ,&nbsp;Arthur L. Greil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Few studies explore in-depth accounts of women’s and men’s experiences with, and transitions between, obstetrician/gynaecologists (OB/GYNs) and reproductive endocrinologists during infertility diagnostic and treatment processes. This study examined this subject matter with data from qualitative, in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Between April 2007 and March 2008, the first author interviewed 20 women and eight men from a large midwestern metropolitan area in the USA who had used, or were in the process of using, any fertility treatment in the 5 years preceding the interview. Six couples and 16 individuals were interviewed, resulting in narratives of 22 distinct infertility journeys. The main complaints made by respondents about OB/GYNs were that they were insufficiently concerned with providing timely treatment and that they paid insufficient attention to male partners. Women felt that their concerns were taken more seriously by reproductive endocrinologists, but complained of insensitivity, depersonalization and misinformation, and were suspicious of a profit orientation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 204-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/16/61/main.PMC8753058.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661821000368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661821000368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在不孕症诊断和治疗过程中,很少有研究深入探讨女性和男性在产科医生/妇科医生(OB/GYNs)和生殖内分泌学家之间的经历和转换。本研究通过定性、深入、半结构化访谈的数据来检验这一主题。在2007年4月至2008年3月期间,第一作者采访了来自美国中西部大城市的20名女性和8名男性,他们在采访之前的5 年里使用过或正在使用任何生育治疗。6对夫妇和16个人接受了采访,得出了22个不同的不孕之旅的叙述。被调查者对妇产科医生的主要抱怨是他们对提供及时治疗的关注不够,对男性伴侣的关注不够。妇女们认为生殖内分泌学家更认真地对待她们的关切,但她们抱怨说,这些医生不够敏感、缺乏人情味、信息错误,并对营利倾向表示怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

From generalist to specialist: A qualitative study of the perceptions of infertility patients

From generalist to specialist: A qualitative study of the perceptions of infertility patients

Few studies explore in-depth accounts of women’s and men’s experiences with, and transitions between, obstetrician/gynaecologists (OB/GYNs) and reproductive endocrinologists during infertility diagnostic and treatment processes. This study examined this subject matter with data from qualitative, in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Between April 2007 and March 2008, the first author interviewed 20 women and eight men from a large midwestern metropolitan area in the USA who had used, or were in the process of using, any fertility treatment in the 5 years preceding the interview. Six couples and 16 individuals were interviewed, resulting in narratives of 22 distinct infertility journeys. The main complaints made by respondents about OB/GYNs were that they were insufficiently concerned with providing timely treatment and that they paid insufficient attention to male partners. Women felt that their concerns were taken more seriously by reproductive endocrinologists, but complained of insensitivity, depersonalization and misinformation, and were suspicious of a profit orientation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: RBMS is a new journal dedicated to interdisciplinary discussion and debate of the rapidly expanding field of reproductive biomedicine, particularly all of its many societal and cultural implications. It is intended to bring to attention new research in the social sciences, arts and humanities on human reproduction, new reproductive technologies, and related areas such as human embryonic stem cell derivation. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policy makers, academics and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信