“寓教于乐”的“城市”:18世纪德国美学想象中的原型。

IF 0.6 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Julian Johannes Koch
{"title":"“寓教于乐”的“城市”:18世纪德国美学想象中的原型。","authors":"Julian Johannes Koch","doi":"10.1353/jhi.2021.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article outlines what is arguably the uniquely German trajectory of the imagination, focusing on the relation between the imagination and \"Urbild\" in eighteenth-century German aesthetics, particularly in Kant and Schelling. I contend that shared German roots of the \"Einbildung\" (imagination) and \"Urbild\" (archetype) in \"Bild\" led German aesthetic thinkers to conceive of the imagination much more in (Neo-)Platonic terms. This article therefore argues that there is a perceptible rift in how the imagination is conceived in eighteenth-century discourse which follows a linguistic fault line between the Latin-origin \"imagination\" and the German \"Einbildung.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":47274,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS","volume":"82 4","pages":"569-591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The \\\"Urbild\\\" of \\\"Einbildung\\\": The Archetype in the Imagination in Eighteenth-Century German Aesthetics.\",\"authors\":\"Julian Johannes Koch\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jhi.2021.0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article outlines what is arguably the uniquely German trajectory of the imagination, focusing on the relation between the imagination and \\\"Urbild\\\" in eighteenth-century German aesthetics, particularly in Kant and Schelling. I contend that shared German roots of the \\\"Einbildung\\\" (imagination) and \\\"Urbild\\\" (archetype) in \\\"Bild\\\" led German aesthetic thinkers to conceive of the imagination much more in (Neo-)Platonic terms. This article therefore argues that there is a perceptible rift in how the imagination is conceived in eighteenth-century discourse which follows a linguistic fault line between the Latin-origin \\\"imagination\\\" and the German \\\"Einbildung.\\\"</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS\",\"volume\":\"82 4\",\"pages\":\"569-591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2021.0033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2021.0033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文概述了德国独特的想象轨迹,重点关注18世纪德国美学,特别是康德和谢林的想象与“城市”之间的关系。我认为,《图片》中“Einbildung”(想象)和“Urbild”(原型)的共同德国根源使德国美学思想家更多地以(新)柏拉图式的术语来构想想象力。因此,本文认为,在18世纪的话语中,想象是如何被构思出来的,这是一个明显的裂缝,它遵循了拉丁语起源的“想象”和德语的“想象”之间的语言断层线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The "Urbild" of "Einbildung": The Archetype in the Imagination in Eighteenth-Century German Aesthetics.

This article outlines what is arguably the uniquely German trajectory of the imagination, focusing on the relation between the imagination and "Urbild" in eighteenth-century German aesthetics, particularly in Kant and Schelling. I contend that shared German roots of the "Einbildung" (imagination) and "Urbild" (archetype) in "Bild" led German aesthetic thinkers to conceive of the imagination much more in (Neo-)Platonic terms. This article therefore argues that there is a perceptible rift in how the imagination is conceived in eighteenth-century discourse which follows a linguistic fault line between the Latin-origin "imagination" and the German "Einbildung."

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1940, the Journal of the History of Ideas has served as a medium for the publication of research in intellectual history that is of common interest to scholars and students in a wide range of fields. It is committed to encouraging diversity in regional coverage, chronological range, and methodological approaches. JHI defines intellectual history expansively and ecumenically, including the histories of philosophy, of literature and the arts, of the natural and social sciences, of religion, and of political thought. It also encourages scholarship at the intersections of cultural and intellectual history — for example, the history of the book and of visual culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信