Mini-iFT确认使用光固化修复复合材料具有优越的粘接性能。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Chloe M F Hardy, Violette Landreau, Margaux Valassis, Ben Mercelis, Jan De Munck, Bart Van Meerbeek, Julian Leprince
{"title":"Mini-iFT确认使用光固化修复复合材料具有优越的粘接性能。","authors":"Chloe M F Hardy,&nbsp;Violette Landreau,&nbsp;Margaux Valassis,&nbsp;Ben Mercelis,&nbsp;Jan De Munck,&nbsp;Bart Van Meerbeek,&nbsp;Julian Leprince","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b2287755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To validate the rationale of using a conventional light-curing resin-based composite (RBC) to lute thick indirect restorations by measuring mini-interfacial fracture toughness (mini-iFT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Freshly exposed dentin of extracted third molars (n = 64) was immediately sealed with a thin layer of an experimental RBC with a 50 wt% or 75 wt% (IDS) filler load. Two- or 6-mm-thick CAD/CAM composite blocks were luted onto IDS using either pre-heated light-cure or dual-cure luting RBC, with the latter having served as control. Samples were cut into sticks, upon which a notch was prepared at the interface between IDS and luting RBC, prior to being submitted to a 4-point bending test to determine mini-iFT. The results were analyzed using a mixed linear model (LME). Failure mode at the fractured interface was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LME revealed that mini-iFT was not significantly affected by the composite block thickness (p = 0.39), but by the luting RBC (p < 0.0001) and the IDS RBC filler load (p = 0.0011). Mini-iFT was higher with 50 wt% filler-loaded RBC IDS and when luted using the light-curing RBC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work provides the proof of concept that 2- and 6-mm-thick indirect restorations can safely be adhesively luted with pre-heated conventional light-cure RBC under controlled light-irradiation conditions. This strategy even seems beneficial in terms of mini-iFT compared to using a dual-cure luting RBC. IDS with lower filler content also appeared more favorable.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"23 6","pages":"539-548"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mini-iFT Confirms Superior Adhesive Luting Performance using Light-curing Restorative Composites.\",\"authors\":\"Chloe M F Hardy,&nbsp;Violette Landreau,&nbsp;Margaux Valassis,&nbsp;Ben Mercelis,&nbsp;Jan De Munck,&nbsp;Bart Van Meerbeek,&nbsp;Julian Leprince\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.jad.b2287755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To validate the rationale of using a conventional light-curing resin-based composite (RBC) to lute thick indirect restorations by measuring mini-interfacial fracture toughness (mini-iFT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Freshly exposed dentin of extracted third molars (n = 64) was immediately sealed with a thin layer of an experimental RBC with a 50 wt% or 75 wt% (IDS) filler load. Two- or 6-mm-thick CAD/CAM composite blocks were luted onto IDS using either pre-heated light-cure or dual-cure luting RBC, with the latter having served as control. Samples were cut into sticks, upon which a notch was prepared at the interface between IDS and luting RBC, prior to being submitted to a 4-point bending test to determine mini-iFT. The results were analyzed using a mixed linear model (LME). Failure mode at the fractured interface was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LME revealed that mini-iFT was not significantly affected by the composite block thickness (p = 0.39), but by the luting RBC (p < 0.0001) and the IDS RBC filler load (p = 0.0011). Mini-iFT was higher with 50 wt% filler-loaded RBC IDS and when luted using the light-curing RBC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work provides the proof of concept that 2- and 6-mm-thick indirect restorations can safely be adhesively luted with pre-heated conventional light-cure RBC under controlled light-irradiation conditions. This strategy even seems beneficial in terms of mini-iFT compared to using a dual-cure luting RBC. IDS with lower filler content also appeared more favorable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"23 6\",\"pages\":\"539-548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2287755\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2287755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:通过测量微界面断裂韧性(mini-iFT)来验证使用传统light-curing树脂基复合材料(RBC)进行厚间接修复的合理性。材料和方法:取出的第三磨牙(n = 64)新鲜暴露的牙本质立即用实验红细胞with薄层密封,填充50 wt%或75 wt% (IDS) >。Two- or 6-mm-thick CAD/CAM复合材料blocks were使用预热光固化或双固化固化rbc_连接到IDS上,后者作为对照。将样品切成棒状,在IDS和凹槽rbc_之间的界面处准备一个缺口,然后提交a 4点弯曲test以确定mini-iFT。使用混合线性模型(LME)对结果进行分析。利用扫描电镜(SEM)确定了断裂界面的破坏模式。结果:LME显示that mini-iFT不受复合块厚度(p = 0.39)影响,但受the luting RBC (p < 0.0001)和IDS RBC填充物负荷(p = 0.0011)影响。当使用light-curing RBC时,Mini-iFT更高。结论:本研究提供了2-和6-mm-thick间接修复体在可控光照射条件下可以安全地粘附于传统光固化RBC的概念证明。这种策略甚至在mini-iFT方面比使用双固化的RBC更有利。填料含量较低的IDS也出现较多favorable。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mini-iFT Confirms Superior Adhesive Luting Performance using Light-curing Restorative Composites.

Purpose: To validate the rationale of using a conventional light-curing resin-based composite (RBC) to lute thick indirect restorations by measuring mini-interfacial fracture toughness (mini-iFT).

Materials and methods: Freshly exposed dentin of extracted third molars (n = 64) was immediately sealed with a thin layer of an experimental RBC with a 50 wt% or 75 wt% (IDS) filler load. Two- or 6-mm-thick CAD/CAM composite blocks were luted onto IDS using either pre-heated light-cure or dual-cure luting RBC, with the latter having served as control. Samples were cut into sticks, upon which a notch was prepared at the interface between IDS and luting RBC, prior to being submitted to a 4-point bending test to determine mini-iFT. The results were analyzed using a mixed linear model (LME). Failure mode at the fractured interface was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Results: LME revealed that mini-iFT was not significantly affected by the composite block thickness (p = 0.39), but by the luting RBC (p < 0.0001) and the IDS RBC filler load (p = 0.0011). Mini-iFT was higher with 50 wt% filler-loaded RBC IDS and when luted using the light-curing RBC.

Conclusion: This work provides the proof of concept that 2- and 6-mm-thick indirect restorations can safely be adhesively luted with pre-heated conventional light-cure RBC under controlled light-irradiation conditions. This strategy even seems beneficial in terms of mini-iFT compared to using a dual-cure luting RBC. IDS with lower filler content also appeared more favorable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信