创伤性脑损伤后执行功能的纵向恢复和社会参与预测。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-22 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2021.2002866
Sabrina Tabet, Maude Laguë-Beauvais, Coralie Francoeur, Audrey Sheehan, Michel Abouassaly, Judith Marcoux, Jehane H Dagher, Adriana Ursulet, Emma Colucci, Elaine de Guise
{"title":"创伤性脑损伤后执行功能的纵向恢复和社会参与预测。","authors":"Sabrina Tabet, Maude Laguë-Beauvais, Coralie Francoeur, Audrey Sheehan, Michel Abouassaly, Judith Marcoux, Jehane H Dagher, Adriana Ursulet, Emma Colucci, Elaine de Guise","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2021.2002866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is heterogeneity across studies and a lack of knowledge about recovery of EFs over time following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Also, EFs are associated with functional outcome, but there is still a gap in knowledge concerning the association between EFs and social participation following TBI. For this reason, we aim to (1) measure the recovery of the three executive function subcomponents of Miyake's model, namely flexibility, updating and inhibition between the acute phase (T1) and 6 months post TBI (T2) and (2) measure the relationship between EFs and social participation after TBI. Thus, a prospective longitudinal study that included 75 patients with TBI (mild and moderate-severe) and 50 patients with orthopedic injuries (controls) without brain damage was carried out. An extensive EFs test battery was administered at T1 and T2 whereas the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) was administered only at T2. In contrast with the controls, both TBI groups improved significantly between T1 and T2 on WMS-III Mental Control test (MC) and the D-KEFS Category Switching Condition of the Verbal Fluency task (SVF). Results also showed a simple time effect for the WAIS-IV Digit span and the Hayling tests. Moreover, there was an association between the SVF test and social participation (MPAI-4) at T2. In conclusion, the MC and SVF tests were found to be the best tools for measuring recovery of EFs following TBI. The SVF test was the most likely measure of EFs to give the neuropsychologist an idea of the patient's social participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50741,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal recovery of executive functions and social participation prediction following traumatic brain injury.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Tabet, Maude Laguë-Beauvais, Coralie Francoeur, Audrey Sheehan, Michel Abouassaly, Judith Marcoux, Jehane H Dagher, Adriana Ursulet, Emma Colucci, Elaine de Guise\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2021.2002866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is heterogeneity across studies and a lack of knowledge about recovery of EFs over time following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Also, EFs are associated with functional outcome, but there is still a gap in knowledge concerning the association between EFs and social participation following TBI. For this reason, we aim to (1) measure the recovery of the three executive function subcomponents of Miyake's model, namely flexibility, updating and inhibition between the acute phase (T1) and 6 months post TBI (T2) and (2) measure the relationship between EFs and social participation after TBI. Thus, a prospective longitudinal study that included 75 patients with TBI (mild and moderate-severe) and 50 patients with orthopedic injuries (controls) without brain damage was carried out. An extensive EFs test battery was administered at T1 and T2 whereas the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) was administered only at T2. In contrast with the controls, both TBI groups improved significantly between T1 and T2 on WMS-III Mental Control test (MC) and the D-KEFS Category Switching Condition of the Verbal Fluency task (SVF). Results also showed a simple time effect for the WAIS-IV Digit span and the Hayling tests. Moreover, there was an association between the SVF test and social participation (MPAI-4) at T2. In conclusion, the MC and SVF tests were found to be the best tools for measuring recovery of EFs following TBI. The SVF test was the most likely measure of EFs to give the neuropsychologist an idea of the patient's social participation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.2002866\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.2002866","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不同研究之间存在异质性,对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后随时间推移恢复的心肺功能也缺乏了解。此外,EFs 与功能性结果相关,但关于 TBI 后 EFs 与社会参与之间的关系的知识仍是空白。因此,我们的目标是:(1)测量三宅一生模型中三个执行功能子组件(即灵活性、更新和抑制)在急性期(T1)和创伤性脑损伤后 6 个月(T2)之间的恢复情况;(2)测量创伤性脑损伤后 EFs 与社会参与之间的关系。因此,我们开展了一项前瞻性纵向研究,其中包括 75 名创伤性脑损伤(轻度和中重度)患者和 50 名无脑损伤的骨科损伤患者(对照组)。在 T1 和 T2 阶段进行了广泛的 EFs 测试,而 Mayo-Portland 适应性量表-4(MPAI-4)仅在 T2 阶段进行了测试。与对照组相比,两组创伤性脑损伤患者在T1和T2阶段的WMS-III精神控制测试(MC)和D-KEFS言语流利性任务(SVF)的类别转换条件方面均有明显改善。结果还显示,WAIS-IV 数字跨度和海林测试存在简单的时间效应。此外,在第二阶段,SVF 测试与社会参与(MPAI-4)之间存在关联。总之,MC 和 SVF 测试是测量创伤性脑损伤后 EF 恢复情况的最佳工具。SVF测试是最有可能让神经心理学家了解患者社会参与情况的EFs测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Longitudinal recovery of executive functions and social participation prediction following traumatic brain injury.

There is heterogeneity across studies and a lack of knowledge about recovery of EFs over time following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Also, EFs are associated with functional outcome, but there is still a gap in knowledge concerning the association between EFs and social participation following TBI. For this reason, we aim to (1) measure the recovery of the three executive function subcomponents of Miyake's model, namely flexibility, updating and inhibition between the acute phase (T1) and 6 months post TBI (T2) and (2) measure the relationship between EFs and social participation after TBI. Thus, a prospective longitudinal study that included 75 patients with TBI (mild and moderate-severe) and 50 patients with orthopedic injuries (controls) without brain damage was carried out. An extensive EFs test battery was administered at T1 and T2 whereas the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) was administered only at T2. In contrast with the controls, both TBI groups improved significantly between T1 and T2 on WMS-III Mental Control test (MC) and the D-KEFS Category Switching Condition of the Verbal Fluency task (SVF). Results also showed a simple time effect for the WAIS-IV Digit span and the Hayling tests. Moreover, there was an association between the SVF test and social participation (MPAI-4) at T2. In conclusion, the MC and SVF tests were found to be the best tools for measuring recovery of EFs following TBI. The SVF test was the most likely measure of EFs to give the neuropsychologist an idea of the patient's social participation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信