Willis覆膜支架重建治疗症状性椎动脉夹层动脉瘤:初步经验

Q3 Medicine
Yi Gu , Li Chen , Yang Zhang , Mo Chen , YongDong Li , YueQi Zhu , HaiTao Lu , LiMing Wei , PeiLei Zhang , MinHua Li , BinXian Gu , Jin You , Wu Wang
{"title":"Willis覆膜支架重建治疗症状性椎动脉夹层动脉瘤:初步经验","authors":"Yi Gu ,&nbsp;Li Chen ,&nbsp;Yang Zhang ,&nbsp;Mo Chen ,&nbsp;YongDong Li ,&nbsp;YueQi Zhu ,&nbsp;HaiTao Lu ,&nbsp;LiMing Wei ,&nbsp;PeiLei Zhang ,&nbsp;MinHua Li ,&nbsp;BinXian Gu ,&nbsp;Jin You ,&nbsp;Wu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jimed.2020.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Symptomatic vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) is a challenging disease with controversy on treatment strategy due to anatomic configuration and their nature. Moreover, the outcomes of reconstructive treatment have not been well established.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of reconstructive endovascular treatment (EVT) for symptomatic VADAs with Willis covered stent.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We evaluated retrospectively 13 patients with symptomatic VADAs who treated with Willis covered stent, compared with stent-assisted coiling (SAC) on the characteristics, posttreatment course, angiographic and clinical follow-up outcomes at an average of 14.4 months (range, 3–48 months).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 33 patients with symptomatic VADAs were reviewed, 23 of these patients with ruptured VADAs. The technical successful rate is 100% respectively in Willis covered stent (Group A) and SAC (Group B, n ​= ​20). The initial complete occlusion rate was significant higher in group A (100%) than group B (30%) (p ​&lt; ​0.01). Major procedure-related complications were not significant different in the two groups. Serial follow-up angiograms revealed 5 recurrent VADAs in group B and no recurrence in group A (p ​&gt; ​0.05). No obvious in-stent stenosis and no re-hemorrhage and delayed ischemic symptoms during the follow-up period. The final angiograms of all survived patients demonstrated the complete occlusion rate was higher in group A (100%) than group B (80%), but no significant statistical difference (p ​&gt; ​0.05). Clinical outcomes were favorable in 31 (93.9%), severe disability occurred in one in group B, and only one death in group A. The final clinical outcomes were also not significant difference in the two groups (p ​&gt; ​0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our initial result demonstrated reconstructive EVT with Willis covered stent provides a viable approach for selected symptomatic VADAs involving the intracranial and extracranial segments, which is similar to favorable results with SAC. However, an expanded clinical experiences and larger cohort studies are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.08.003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconstructive treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms with Willis covered stent: Initial experience\",\"authors\":\"Yi Gu ,&nbsp;Li Chen ,&nbsp;Yang Zhang ,&nbsp;Mo Chen ,&nbsp;YongDong Li ,&nbsp;YueQi Zhu ,&nbsp;HaiTao Lu ,&nbsp;LiMing Wei ,&nbsp;PeiLei Zhang ,&nbsp;MinHua Li ,&nbsp;BinXian Gu ,&nbsp;Jin You ,&nbsp;Wu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jimed.2020.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Symptomatic vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) is a challenging disease with controversy on treatment strategy due to anatomic configuration and their nature. Moreover, the outcomes of reconstructive treatment have not been well established.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of reconstructive endovascular treatment (EVT) for symptomatic VADAs with Willis covered stent.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We evaluated retrospectively 13 patients with symptomatic VADAs who treated with Willis covered stent, compared with stent-assisted coiling (SAC) on the characteristics, posttreatment course, angiographic and clinical follow-up outcomes at an average of 14.4 months (range, 3–48 months).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 33 patients with symptomatic VADAs were reviewed, 23 of these patients with ruptured VADAs. The technical successful rate is 100% respectively in Willis covered stent (Group A) and SAC (Group B, n ​= ​20). The initial complete occlusion rate was significant higher in group A (100%) than group B (30%) (p ​&lt; ​0.01). Major procedure-related complications were not significant different in the two groups. Serial follow-up angiograms revealed 5 recurrent VADAs in group B and no recurrence in group A (p ​&gt; ​0.05). No obvious in-stent stenosis and no re-hemorrhage and delayed ischemic symptoms during the follow-up period. The final angiograms of all survived patients demonstrated the complete occlusion rate was higher in group A (100%) than group B (80%), but no significant statistical difference (p ​&gt; ​0.05). Clinical outcomes were favorable in 31 (93.9%), severe disability occurred in one in group B, and only one death in group A. The final clinical outcomes were also not significant difference in the two groups (p ​&gt; ​0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our initial result demonstrated reconstructive EVT with Willis covered stent provides a viable approach for selected symptomatic VADAs involving the intracranial and extracranial segments, which is similar to favorable results with SAC. However, an expanded clinical experiences and larger cohort studies are needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.08.003\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209636022030051X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209636022030051X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

症状性椎动脉夹层动脉瘤(VADA)是一种具有挑战性的疾病,由于其解剖形态和性质,在治疗策略上存在争议。此外,重建治疗的结果尚未得到很好的确定。目的评价血管内重建治疗(EVT)治疗症状性vada的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性评价13例经Willis覆膜支架治疗的有症状VADAs患者的特点、治疗后病程、血管造影和临床随访结果,平均随访14.4个月(范围3-48个月),与支架辅助盘绕(SAC)进行比较。结果共纳入33例有症状的vada患者,其中23例为vada破裂。Willis覆膜支架(A组)和SAC (B组,n = 20)的技术成功率分别为100%。初始完全闭塞率A组(100%)明显高于B组(30%)(p <0.01)。两组主要手术相关并发症无显著差异。连续随访血管造影显示,B组有5例vada复发,A组无复发(p >0.05)。随访期间无明显支架内狭窄,无再出血及迟发性缺血症状。所有存活患者的最终血管造影显示,A组的完全闭塞率(100%)高于B组(80%),但差异无统计学意义(p >0.05)。31例(93.9%)患者临床预后良好,B组1例发生严重残疾,a组仅有1例死亡。两组患者最终临床预后也无显著差异(p >0.05)。结论初步结果表明,Willis覆膜支架重建EVT为部分累及颅内和颅外段的症状性vada提供了可行的治疗方法,其效果与SAC相似。然而,需要扩大临床经验和更大的队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reconstructive treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms with Willis covered stent: Initial experience

Reconstructive treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms with Willis covered stent: Initial experience

Reconstructive treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms with Willis covered stent: Initial experience

Reconstructive treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms with Willis covered stent: Initial experience

Background

Symptomatic vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) is a challenging disease with controversy on treatment strategy due to anatomic configuration and their nature. Moreover, the outcomes of reconstructive treatment have not been well established.

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of reconstructive endovascular treatment (EVT) for symptomatic VADAs with Willis covered stent.

Methods

We evaluated retrospectively 13 patients with symptomatic VADAs who treated with Willis covered stent, compared with stent-assisted coiling (SAC) on the characteristics, posttreatment course, angiographic and clinical follow-up outcomes at an average of 14.4 months (range, 3–48 months).

Results

A total of 33 patients with symptomatic VADAs were reviewed, 23 of these patients with ruptured VADAs. The technical successful rate is 100% respectively in Willis covered stent (Group A) and SAC (Group B, n ​= ​20). The initial complete occlusion rate was significant higher in group A (100%) than group B (30%) (p ​< ​0.01). Major procedure-related complications were not significant different in the two groups. Serial follow-up angiograms revealed 5 recurrent VADAs in group B and no recurrence in group A (p ​> ​0.05). No obvious in-stent stenosis and no re-hemorrhage and delayed ischemic symptoms during the follow-up period. The final angiograms of all survived patients demonstrated the complete occlusion rate was higher in group A (100%) than group B (80%), but no significant statistical difference (p ​> ​0.05). Clinical outcomes were favorable in 31 (93.9%), severe disability occurred in one in group B, and only one death in group A. The final clinical outcomes were also not significant difference in the two groups (p ​> ​0.05).

Conclusions

Our initial result demonstrated reconstructive EVT with Willis covered stent provides a viable approach for selected symptomatic VADAs involving the intracranial and extracranial segments, which is similar to favorable results with SAC. However, an expanded clinical experiences and larger cohort studies are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interventional Medicine
Journal of Interventional Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信