更新的荷兰院前急救医疗服务2021-2026年国家研究议程:德尔菲研究

Lilian C M Vloet, Gijs Hesselink, Sivera A A Berben, Margreet Hoogeveen, Paul J T Rood, Remco H A Ebben
{"title":"更新的荷兰院前急救医疗服务2021-2026年国家研究议程:德尔菲研究","authors":"Lilian C M Vloet,&nbsp;Gijs Hesselink,&nbsp;Sivera A A Berben,&nbsp;Margreet Hoogeveen,&nbsp;Paul J T Rood,&nbsp;Remco H A Ebben","doi":"10.1186/s13049-021-00971-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2015, a national research agenda was established for Dutch prehospital EMS to underpin the evidence base of care delivery and inform policymakers and funders. The continuously increasing demand for ambulance care and the reorientation towards the role of EMS in recent years may have changed research priorities. Therefore, this study aimed to update the Dutch national EMS research agenda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-round online Delphi survey was used to explore and discuss different viewpoints and to reach consensus on research priorities (i.e., themes and special interest groups, e.g. patient types who require specific research attention). A multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 62) was recruited in the field of prehospital EMS and delegates of relevant professional organizations and stakeholders participated. In round one, fifty-nine research themes and six special interest groups (derived from several resources) were rated on importance on a 5-point scale by the panel members. In round two, the panel selected their priority themes and special interest groups (yes/no), and those with a positive difference score were further assessed in round three. In this final round, appropriateness of the remaining themes and agreement within the panel was taken into account, following the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, which resulted in the final list of research priorities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response per round varied between 94 and 100 percent. In round one, a reduction from 59 to 25 themes and the selection of three special interest groups was realized. Round two resulted in the prioritization of six themes and one special interest group ('Vulnerable elderly'). Round three showed an adequate level of agreement regarding all six themes: 'Registration and (digital) exchange of patient data in the chain of emergency care'; 'Mobile care consultation/Non conveyance'; 'Care coordination'; 'Cooperation with professional partners within the care domain'; 'Care differentiation' and 'Triage and urgency classification'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The updated Dutch national EMS research agenda builds further on the previous version and introduces new EMS research priorities that correspond with the future challenges prehospital EMS care is faced with. This agenda will guide researchers, policymakers and funding bodies in prioritizing future research projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":501057,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605575/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The updated national research agenda 2021-2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Lilian C M Vloet,&nbsp;Gijs Hesselink,&nbsp;Sivera A A Berben,&nbsp;Margreet Hoogeveen,&nbsp;Paul J T Rood,&nbsp;Remco H A Ebben\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13049-021-00971-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2015, a national research agenda was established for Dutch prehospital EMS to underpin the evidence base of care delivery and inform policymakers and funders. The continuously increasing demand for ambulance care and the reorientation towards the role of EMS in recent years may have changed research priorities. Therefore, this study aimed to update the Dutch national EMS research agenda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-round online Delphi survey was used to explore and discuss different viewpoints and to reach consensus on research priorities (i.e., themes and special interest groups, e.g. patient types who require specific research attention). A multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 62) was recruited in the field of prehospital EMS and delegates of relevant professional organizations and stakeholders participated. In round one, fifty-nine research themes and six special interest groups (derived from several resources) were rated on importance on a 5-point scale by the panel members. In round two, the panel selected their priority themes and special interest groups (yes/no), and those with a positive difference score were further assessed in round three. In this final round, appropriateness of the remaining themes and agreement within the panel was taken into account, following the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, which resulted in the final list of research priorities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response per round varied between 94 and 100 percent. In round one, a reduction from 59 to 25 themes and the selection of three special interest groups was realized. Round two resulted in the prioritization of six themes and one special interest group ('Vulnerable elderly'). Round three showed an adequate level of agreement regarding all six themes: 'Registration and (digital) exchange of patient data in the chain of emergency care'; 'Mobile care consultation/Non conveyance'; 'Care coordination'; 'Cooperation with professional partners within the care domain'; 'Care differentiation' and 'Triage and urgency classification'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The updated Dutch national EMS research agenda builds further on the previous version and introduces new EMS research priorities that correspond with the future challenges prehospital EMS care is faced with. This agenda will guide researchers, policymakers and funding bodies in prioritizing future research projects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605575/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00971-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00971-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:2015年,荷兰为院前EMS制定了一项国家研究议程,以巩固护理服务的证据基础,并为政策制定者和资助者提供信息。近年来,对救护车护理的需求不断增加,对EMS角色的重新定位可能改变了研究重点。因此,本研究旨在更新荷兰国家EMS研究议程。方法:采用三轮在线德尔菲调查来探讨和讨论不同的观点,并就研究重点(即主题和特殊兴趣群体,例如需要特别研究关注的患者类型)达成共识。在院前急救领域招募了一个多学科专家小组(n = 62),相关专业组织和利益相关者的代表参加了会议。在第一轮中,小组成员对59个研究主题和6个特殊兴趣小组(来自几个资源)的重要性进行了5分制的评分。在第二轮中,小组选择他们的优先主题和特殊兴趣小组(是/否),而那些差异得分为正的小组在第三轮中进一步评估。在最后一轮中,根据兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校的适当性方法,考虑了剩余主题的适当性和小组内部的协议,从而得出了最终的研究优先事项清单。结果:每轮调查的回复率在94%到100%之间。在第一轮中,实现了从59个主题减少到25个主题,并选择了三个特别利益集团。第二轮的结果是确定了六个主题的优先顺序和一个特别兴趣小组(“弱势老年人”)。第三轮调查显示,所有六个主题均达成了足够程度的共识:“急诊护理链中患者数据的注册和(数字)交换”;“流动护理咨询/非交通工具”;“护理协调”;“与护理领域的专业伙伴合作”;“护理区分”和“分诊和紧急分类”。结论:更新后的荷兰国家EMS研究议程在先前版本的基础上进一步建立,并引入了新的EMS研究重点,与院前EMS护理面临的未来挑战相对应。这一议程将指导科学家、决策者和资助机构确定未来研究项目的优先次序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The updated national research agenda 2021-2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study.

The updated national research agenda 2021-2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study.

The updated national research agenda 2021-2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study.

The updated national research agenda 2021-2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study.

Background: In 2015, a national research agenda was established for Dutch prehospital EMS to underpin the evidence base of care delivery and inform policymakers and funders. The continuously increasing demand for ambulance care and the reorientation towards the role of EMS in recent years may have changed research priorities. Therefore, this study aimed to update the Dutch national EMS research agenda.

Methods: A three-round online Delphi survey was used to explore and discuss different viewpoints and to reach consensus on research priorities (i.e., themes and special interest groups, e.g. patient types who require specific research attention). A multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 62) was recruited in the field of prehospital EMS and delegates of relevant professional organizations and stakeholders participated. In round one, fifty-nine research themes and six special interest groups (derived from several resources) were rated on importance on a 5-point scale by the panel members. In round two, the panel selected their priority themes and special interest groups (yes/no), and those with a positive difference score were further assessed in round three. In this final round, appropriateness of the remaining themes and agreement within the panel was taken into account, following the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, which resulted in the final list of research priorities.

Results: The survey response per round varied between 94 and 100 percent. In round one, a reduction from 59 to 25 themes and the selection of three special interest groups was realized. Round two resulted in the prioritization of six themes and one special interest group ('Vulnerable elderly'). Round three showed an adequate level of agreement regarding all six themes: 'Registration and (digital) exchange of patient data in the chain of emergency care'; 'Mobile care consultation/Non conveyance'; 'Care coordination'; 'Cooperation with professional partners within the care domain'; 'Care differentiation' and 'Triage and urgency classification'.

Conclusions: The updated Dutch national EMS research agenda builds further on the previous version and introduces new EMS research priorities that correspond with the future challenges prehospital EMS care is faced with. This agenda will guide researchers, policymakers and funding bodies in prioritizing future research projects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信