地方卫生部门应对COVID-19使用接触者追踪工具经验的定性分析

Layné Clements, Christina Baum
{"title":"地方卫生部门应对COVID-19使用接触者追踪工具经验的定性分析","authors":"Layné Clements, Christina Baum","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In March of 2020, the World Health Organization declared a pandemic in response to COVID-19, the respiratory illness caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In the United States, there have been about 40 million individuals infected with COVID-19, almost 645000 COVID-19-related deaths, and these figures continue to rise. The pandemic response has necessitated engagement at the federal, state, and local levels of public health (as well as from health care and community partners), and local health departments (LHDs), as the chief health strategists in their communities, have played a vital and diverse role in COVID-19 prevention and response. Responding to COVID-19 has required many strategies, including aggressive testing, vaccination, and extensive contact tracing. Contact tracing has long been an LHD practice to interrupt the spread of and contain infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and sexually transmitted infections. It involves activities such as notifying those exposed to a disease, assisting with testing, monitoring for symptoms, and requesting self-quarantine or self-isolation. Despite routinely performing contact tracing prior to the pandemic, the transmissibility and severity of COVID-19 infections and resulting massive explosion of cases and contacts meant that LHDs were rapidly inundated, and many sought to implement an enhanced contact-tracing tool for improved case management. While quantitative analysis and reports regarding the tools adopted at the state and local level exist, qualitative inquiry into better understanding the impact and usefulness of these tools has not yet been reported. As a result, beginning in 2021, the","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":" ","pages":"101-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Analysis of Local Health Departments' Experiences With Contact-Tracing Tools in Response to COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Layné Clements, Christina Baum\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In March of 2020, the World Health Organization declared a pandemic in response to COVID-19, the respiratory illness caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In the United States, there have been about 40 million individuals infected with COVID-19, almost 645000 COVID-19-related deaths, and these figures continue to rise. The pandemic response has necessitated engagement at the federal, state, and local levels of public health (as well as from health care and community partners), and local health departments (LHDs), as the chief health strategists in their communities, have played a vital and diverse role in COVID-19 prevention and response. Responding to COVID-19 has required many strategies, including aggressive testing, vaccination, and extensive contact tracing. Contact tracing has long been an LHD practice to interrupt the spread of and contain infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and sexually transmitted infections. It involves activities such as notifying those exposed to a disease, assisting with testing, monitoring for symptoms, and requesting self-quarantine or self-isolation. Despite routinely performing contact tracing prior to the pandemic, the transmissibility and severity of COVID-19 infections and resulting massive explosion of cases and contacts meant that LHDs were rapidly inundated, and many sought to implement an enhanced contact-tracing tool for improved case management. While quantitative analysis and reports regarding the tools adopted at the state and local level exist, qualitative inquiry into better understanding the impact and usefulness of these tools has not yet been reported. As a result, beginning in 2021, the\",\"PeriodicalId\":296123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Qualitative Analysis of Local Health Departments' Experiences With Contact-Tracing Tools in Response to COVID-19.
In March of 2020, the World Health Organization declared a pandemic in response to COVID-19, the respiratory illness caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In the United States, there have been about 40 million individuals infected with COVID-19, almost 645000 COVID-19-related deaths, and these figures continue to rise. The pandemic response has necessitated engagement at the federal, state, and local levels of public health (as well as from health care and community partners), and local health departments (LHDs), as the chief health strategists in their communities, have played a vital and diverse role in COVID-19 prevention and response. Responding to COVID-19 has required many strategies, including aggressive testing, vaccination, and extensive contact tracing. Contact tracing has long been an LHD practice to interrupt the spread of and contain infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and sexually transmitted infections. It involves activities such as notifying those exposed to a disease, assisting with testing, monitoring for symptoms, and requesting self-quarantine or self-isolation. Despite routinely performing contact tracing prior to the pandemic, the transmissibility and severity of COVID-19 infections and resulting massive explosion of cases and contacts meant that LHDs were rapidly inundated, and many sought to implement an enhanced contact-tracing tool for improved case management. While quantitative analysis and reports regarding the tools adopted at the state and local level exist, qualitative inquiry into better understanding the impact and usefulness of these tools has not yet been reported. As a result, beginning in 2021, the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信